Alteration ofinterocular suppression following monocular homogeneous stimulus

Psychologia

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 47-53

  Ikeda, Kazunari ^a   Morotomi, Takashi ^b  

^a TOKYO GAKUGEI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Sakushin Gakuin University   (Japan)

Author keywords

Binocular rivalry; Color; Flash suppression; Permanent suppression; Priming

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547471456     PISSN: 00332852     EISSN: 13475916     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2117/psysoc.2007.47     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Blake, R., & Camisa, J. 1978. Is binocular vision always monocular? Science, 200, 1497-1499.
2. Fox, R. 1991. Binocular rivalry. In J. R. Cronly-Dillon (Series Ed.) & D. M. Regan (Vol. Ed.), Vision and visual dysfunction: Vol. 9. Binocular vision (pp. 93-110). New York: Macmillan.
3. Holmes, D. J., Hancock, S., & Andrews, T. J. 2006. Independent binocular integration for form and colour. Vision Research, 46, 665-677.
4. Ikeda, K., & Morotomi, T. 2000a. Feature-specific priming effects upon short duration binocular rivalry. Psychologia, 43, 123-134.
5. Ikeda, K., & Morotomi, T. 2000b. Suppression of rival binocular inputs induced by a blank-field priming stimulus. Perception, 29 Supplement, 101.
6. Ikeda, K., & Morotomi, T. 2002. Color-specific filtering of rival binocular inputs induced by priming. Japanese Psychological Research, 44, 59-67.
7. Kreiman, G., & Koch, C. 1999. Flash suppression: Competition between eyes or patterns? Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 40 Supplement, 421.
8. Loop, M. S., Baldwin, J. B., & Edwards, D. J. 1996. Permanent suppression is wavelength specific. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 37 Supplement, 653.
9. Ooi, T. L., & He, Z. J. 1999. Binocular rivalry and visual awareness: The role of attention. Perception, 28, 551-574.
10. Ooi, T. L., & Loop, M. S. 1994. Visual suppression and its effect upon color and luminance sensitivity. Vision Research, 34, 2997-3003.
11. Sengpiel, F., & Blakemore, C. 1994. Interocular control of neuronal responsiveness in cat visual cortex. Nature, 368, 847-850.
12. Sengpiel, F., Blakemore, C., & Harrad, R. 1995. Interocular suppression in the primary visual cortex: A possible neural basis of binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 35, 179-195.
13. Smith, E. L. Ill, Fern, K., Manny, R., & Harwerth, R. S. 1994. Interocular suppression produced by rivalry stimuli: A comparison of normal and abnormal binocular vision. Optometry and Vision Science, 71, 479-491.
14. Wolfe, J. M. 1983. Influence of spatial frequency, luminance, and duration on binocular rivalry and abnormal fusion of briefly presented dichoptic stimuli. Perception, 12, 447-456.
15. Wolfe, J. M. 1984. Reversing ocular dominance and suppression in a single flash. Vision Research, 24, 471-478.