Teaching gender in international relations

International Studies Perspectives

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 323-325

  Mertus, Julie ^a  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Feminism; Gender; International relations; Teaching

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; FEMINISM; GENDER RELATIONS; INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS; TEACHING;

EID: 34547461287     PISSN: 15283577     EISSN: 15283585     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-3585.2007.00295.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bartlett, Katharine T. (1999) Cracking Foundations as Feminist Method. American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy and the Law 8: 31-50.
2. Hirschmann, N. (1992) Rethinking Obligation: A Feminist Method for Political Theory. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
3. Mertus, Julie. (2003) Shouting From the Bottom of the Well. International Journal of Feminist Politics. 110-128.
4. Mertus, Julie, and Pamela Goldberg. (1999) A perspective on Women and International Human Rights after the Vienna Declaration: The Inside/ Outside Construct. Journal of International Law and Politics 26: 201.
5. Peterson, V. S. (2000) Rereading Public and Private: The Dichotomy Is Not One. SAIS Review 20(2): 11-28.
6. Slaughter, Anne-Marie, and Steven R. Ratner. (1999) The Method is the Message. American Journal of International Law 93: 410-424.
7. Steans, J. (1998) Gender and International Relations. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
8. Tickner, J. Ann. (2001) Gendering World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
9. Zalewski, M. (1995) What Is the Feminist Perspective on Bosnia? International Affairs 71(2): 339-356.