Network neutrality is the new common carriage

Info

Volumn 9, Issue 2-3, 2007, Pages 136-147

  Sandvig, Christian ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Discrimination; Networking; Public interest; Telecommunications

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION NETWORK; INTERNET; PUBLIC SECTOR; TELECOMMUNICATION;

EID: 34547459011     PISSN: 14636697     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14636690710734751     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Aronowitz, S. (2005), "Brand X internet Services v. FCC: The case of the missing policy argument", Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 887-905.
2. Bar, F., Borrus, M. and Steinberg, R. (1995), "Islands in the bit-stream: Mapping the NII interoperability debate", Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy Working Paper # 79, BRIE, Berkeley, CA. available at: www-rcf.usc.edu/~fbar/Publications/ islands-in-the-bitstream.pdf.
3. Bar, F., Cohen, S., Cowhey, P., DeLong, B., Kleeman, M. and Zysman, J. (2000), "Access and innovation policy for the third-generation internet", Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 24 Nos 6/7, pp. 489-518.
4. Beke, T. (1998), "Fending off automated mass electronic mail: Or, how to distinguish yourself from a computer", First Monday, Vol. 3 No. 2, available at: www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue3_2/beke/.
5. Braman, S. and Roberts, S. (2003), "Advantage ISP: Terms of service as media law", New Media & Society, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 422-48.
6. Cave, M. and Mason, R. (2001), "The economics of the internet: infrastructure and regulation", Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 188-201.
7. Cook, G. (Ed.) (2006), "Symposium discussion, Part II: Uses for devices of multiple capabilities cannot always be predicted or channeled", The Cook Report on internet Protocol, Vol. 14 Nos 10/ 11, pp. 71-117.
8. de Sola Pool, I. (1983), Technologies of Freedom, Harvard University Press, Boston, MA.
9. Dinkes, J.S. (2005), "Rethinking the revolution: Competitive telephony in a voice over internet protocol era", Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 66 No. 4, pp. 833-73.
10. Farrell, J. and Weiser, P.J. (2003), "Modularity, vertical integration, and open access policies: Towards a convergence of antitrust and regulation in the internet age", Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 83-134, available at: http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/articles/pdf/v17/17HarvJLTech085.pdf.
11. Flynn, D. (2006), "Hit the fast lane", The Age, Tech: Connectivity, available at: www.theage.com.au/news/wireless-broadband/ hit-the-fast-lane/2006/06/28/1151174266136.html (accessed 1 July).
12. Hearn, L. (2006), "BigPond chasing AFL web rights", The Sydney Morning Herald BizTech, available at: www.smh.com.au/news/biztech/ bigpond-chasing-afl-web-rights/2006/06/28/1151174258981.html (accessed 29 June).
13. Hunter, C. (2000), "Social impacts: Internet filter effectiveness - testing over- and under-inclusive blocking decisions of four popular web filters", Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 214-22.
14. Kalathil, S. and Boas, T.C. (2003), Open Networks, Closed Regimes: The Impact of the internet on Authoritarian Rule, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington DC.
15. Lessig, L., Wendell, C. and Carlsmith, E.M. (2006), "Testimony of Lawrence Lessig, C. Wendell, and Edith M. Carlsmith in Hearing on 'Network Neutrality'", US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Washington, DC. Available at: http://commerce.senate.gov/pdf/lessig-020706.pdf.
16. Network Advisory Committee (2002), "Commodity network bandwidth: problems and recommendations", University of California, Berkeley, CA, September, available at: http://nac.berkeley.edu/bandwidth/.
17. Neuman, W.R., McKnight, L. and Solomon, R.J. (1997), The Godian Knot: Political Gridlock on the Information Highway, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
18. Noam, E. (1994), "Beyond liberalization II: The impending doom of common carriage", Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 18 No. 6, pp. 435-52.
19. OpenNet Initiative (2005), "Telus blocks consumer access to Labour Union web site and filters an additional 766 unrelated sites", OpenNet Initiative Bulletin, No. 10, available at: www.opennetinitiative.net/bulletins/010/.
20. Sandvig, C. (2003), "An initial assessment of cooperative action in wi-fi networking", Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 28 Nos 7/8, pp. 579-602.
21. Schuler, D. (1996), New Community Networks: Wired for Change, Addison-Wesley, New York, NY.
22. Surowiecki, J. (2006), "Net losses", The New Yorker, 20 March, available at: www.newyorker.com/talk/content/articles/ 060320ta_talk_surowiecki.
23. USC Annenberg Center (2006), "The Annenberg Center Principles for Network Neutrality", Available at: www.annenberg.edu/news/ news.php?id=13.
24. Wu, T. (2003), "Network neutrality, broadband discrimination", Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 141-79.
25. Wu, T. (2005), "One rule for telecommunications regulation", paper presented to the 32nd Annual Conference on Communication, Information, and internet Policy. Washington, DC, available at: http://web.si.umich.edu/tprc/papers/2005/420/onerule.PDF.
26. Yoo, C. (2004), "Would mandating broadband network neutrality help or hurt competition? A comment on the end-to-end debate", Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 23-68.
27. Zittrain, J. and Edelman, B. (2003), "Empirical analysis of internet filtering in China", unpublished manuscript, available at: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/filtering/china/.