Stabilized discontinuous Galerkin methods for flow-sound interaction

Journal of Computational Acoustics

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 123-143

  Richter, Andreas ^a   Stiller, Jörg ^a   Grundmann, Roger ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

DG; High order methods; Musical acoustics; Slope limiting; Wave propagation

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547448782     PISSN: 0218396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0218396X0700324X     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. G. Karniadakis and S. Sherwin, Spectral/hp Element Methods for Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2nd edn. (Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2005).
2. D. Skulina, A study of nonlinear acoustic flows at the open end of a tube using Particle Image Velocimetry, PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh (2005).
3. B. Cockburn, G. E. Karniadakis and C.-W. Shu, Discontinuous Galerkin Methods, Theory, Computation and Applications (Springer, New York, 1999).
4. B. Szabo and I. Babuška, Introduction to Finite Element Analysis (Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York, 1990).
5. C-W. Shu, Total-variational-diminishing time discretizations, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 9 (1988) 1073.
6. L. Krivodonova and M. Berger, High-order accurate implementation of solid wall boundary conditions in curved geometries, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, J. Comput. Phys. 211 (2006) 492-512.
7. K. W. Thompson, Time-dependent boundary conditions for hyperbolic systems, I & II, J. Comput. Phys. 68 (1987) 1-24.
8. A. Ramm, Scattering by Obstacles (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1986).
9. D. Appelö and G. Kreiss, Stabilized local non-reflecting boundary conditions for high order methods, Technical Report, NADA, Royal Institute of Technology (2003).
10. J. Berenger, A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves, J. Comput. Phys. 114 (1994) 185-200.
11. B. Engquist and A. Majda, Absorbing boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves, J. Math. Comput. 31 (1977) 629-651.
12. M. Giles, Nonreflecting boundary conditions for euler equation calculations, AIAA J. 28 (1990) 2050-2058.
13. D. Givoli, Recent advances in the DtN FE method, Arch. Comput. Meth. Eng. 6 (1999) 71-116.
14. T. Hagstrom and S. I. Hariharan, A formulation of asymptotic and exact boundary conditions using local operators, J. Appl. Numer. Math. 27 (1998) 403-416.
15. S. Abarbanel and D. Gottlieb. A mathematical analysis of the pml method, J. Comput. Phys. 134 (1997) 357-363.
16. S. Abarbanel, D. Gottlieb and J. S. Hesthaven, Well posed perfectly matched layers for advective acoustics, J. Comput. Phys. 154 (1999) 266-283.
17. T. Hagstrom, New results on absorbing layers and radiation boundary conditions, in Topics in Computational Wave Propagation, eds. M. Ainsworth, P. Davies, D. Duncan, P. Martin and B. Rynne (Springer, New York, 2003).
18. B. Cockburn, S.-Y. Lin and C.-W. Shu, The Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws V: Multidimensional systems, J. Comput. Phys. 141 (1998) 199-224.
19. S. Karni, Far-field operators for suppression of reflections from artificial boundaries, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 33 (1996) 1014-1047.
20. M. O. Deville, P. F. Fischer and E. H. Mund, High-Order Methods for Incompressible Fluid Flow (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002).
21. R. J. LeVeque, Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002).
22. C.-W. Shu and S. Osher, Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 77 (1988) 439-471.
23. L. Krivodonova, J. Xin, J.-F. Remade, N. Chevaugeon and J. E. Flaherty, Shock detection and limiting with discontinuous galerkin methods for hyperbolic conservation laws, Appl. Numer. Math. 48 (2004) 323-338.
24. J. Qiu and C-W. Shu, A Comparison of troubled-cell indicators for Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin methods using weighted essentially nonoscillatory limiters, J. Sci. Comput. 27 (2005) 995-1013.
25. E. Toro, Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics (Springer, Berlin, 1997).
26. C. Hirsch, Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows, Vols. 1 and 2 (Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York, 1990).
27. B. Cockburn, S.-Y. Lin and C-W. Shu, TVB Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws II: General framework, Math. Comput. 52 (1989) 411-435.
28. R. Biswas, K. Devine and J. E. Flaherty, Parallel, adaptive finite element methods for conservation laws, Appl. Numer. Math. 14 (1994) 255-283.
29. K. D. Devine and J. E. Flaherty, Parallel adaptive hp-refinement techniques for conservation laws, Appl. Numer. Math. 20 (1996) 367-386.
30. R. Biswas, Parallel and adaptive methods for hyperbolic partial differential systems, Ph.D. dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York (1991).
31. M. Berger, M. J. Aftosmis and M. Murman, Analysis of slope limiters on irregular grids, NAS Technical Report 05-007 (2005).
32. T. Barth and D. Jesperson, The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes, in 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA 89-0366, Reno, Nevada, 1989.
33. S. Tu and S. Aliabadi, A slope limiting procedure in discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for gasdynamics applications, J. Numer. Anal. Model. 2 (2005) 163-178.
34. H. Hoteit, Ph. Ackerer, R. Mose, J. Erhel and B. Philippe, New two-dimensional slope limiters for discontinuous Galerkin methods on arbitrary meshes, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 61 (2004) 2566-2593.
35. A. Burbeau, P. Sagaut and Ch.-H. Bruneau, A problem-independent limiter for high-order Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin methods, J. Comput. Phys. 169 (2001) 111-150.
36. P. Woodward and P. Colella, The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks, J. Comput. Phys. 54 (1984) 115-173.
37. F. Q. Hu and H. L. Atkins, A discrete analysis of non-reflecting boundary conditions for discontinuous Galerkin method, AIAA Paper (2003) 3301.
38. C. K. W. Tam and J. C. Webb, Dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics, J. Comput. Phys. 107 (1993) 262-281.
39. D. Keefe, Wind-instrument reection function measurements in the time domain, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96 (1999) 2370-2381.
40. D. Keefe, Experiments on the single woodwind tone hole, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72 (1982) 688-699.
41. J. Martinez, J. Agulló and S. Cardona, Conical bores. Part II: Multiconvolution, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84 (1988) 1620-1627.