|
Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 413-420
|
Enhancing rigor in qualitative description: a case study.
a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR;
ATTITUDE TO HEALTH;
DECISION MAKING;
DOCUMENTATION;
EDUCATION;
EPIDEMIOLOGY;
HUMAN;
HUMAN RELATION;
INFORMATION PROCESSING;
INTERVIEW;
METHODOLOGY;
NURSE ATTITUDE;
NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH;
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;
PEER REVIEW;
PERSONNEL;
PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE;
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
REVIEW;
SAMPLE SIZE;
SELF CARE;
STANDARD;
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;
THINKING;
URINE INCONTINENCE;
VERBAL COMMUNICATION;
ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING;
ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL;
ATTITUDE TO HEALTH;
BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY);
DATA COLLECTION;
DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL;
DECISION MAKING;
FOCUS GROUPS;
HUMANS;
INTERVIEWS;
NARRATION;
NURSE'S ROLE;
NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH;
PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH;
PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE;
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
RESEARCH DESIGN;
RESEARCH PERSONNEL;
RESEARCHER-SUBJECT RELATIONS;
SAMPLE SIZE;
SELF CARE;
THINKING;
URINARY INCONTINENCE;
|
EID: 34547441044
PISSN: 10715754
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1097/00152192-200511000-00014 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (280)
|
References (33)
|