Emotion inferences during reading comprehension: What evidence can the self-pace reading paradigm provide?

Discourse Processes

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 33-50

  Gygax, Pascal ^a   Tapiero, Isabelle ^b   Carruzzo, Emanuelle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FRIBOURG   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547434768     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01638530701285564     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25(2), 257-271.
2. Consedine, N. S., Strongman, K. T., & Magai, C. (2003). Emotions and behavior: Data from a cross-cultural recognition study. Cognition and Emotion, 17(6), 881-902.
3. de Vega, M., Leon, I., & Diaz, J. M. (1996). The representation of changing emotions in reading comprehension. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 303-321.
4. de Vega, M., Diaz, J. M., & Leon, I. (1997). To know or not to know: comprehending protagonists' beliefs and their emotional consequences. Discourse Processes, 23, 169-192.
5. Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Garnham, A. (1992). Minimalism versus constructionism: A false dichotomy in theories of inference during reading. Psycholoquy, 3(63). Retrieved January 2000 from http://www.cogsci.ecs. soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?73.63
7. Garnham, A. (1996). The other side of mental models: Theories of language comprehension. In J. Oakhill & A. Garnham (Eds.), Mental models in cognitive science: Essays in honour of phil johnson-laird (pp. 35-52). Hove: Psychology Press.
8. Gernsbacher, M. A., Goldsmith, H. H., & Robertson, R. W. (1992). Do readers mentally represent characters' emotional states? Cognition and Emotion, 6(2), 89-111.
9. Gernsbacher, M. A., & Robertson, R. W. (1992). Knowledge activation versus sentence mapping when representing fictional characters' emotional states. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7(3/4), 353-371.
10. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997). Two decades of structure building. Discourse Processes, 23, 65-304.
11. Gygax, P., Oakhill, J., & Garnham, A. (2003). The representation of characters' emotional responses: Do readers infer specific emotions? Cognition and Emotion, 17(3), 413-428.
12. Gygax, P., Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J. (2004). Inferring characters' emotional states: Can readers infer specific emotions? Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(5), 613-638.
13. Gygax, P., & Tapiero, I. (2003). Divide and conquer: A study of the semantic structure of emotional inferences in reading comprehension. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of Swiss Psychology, Bern, Switzerland.
14. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Tabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371-395.
15. Herrmann, T. (1982). Language and situation: The pars pro toto principle. In C. Frazer & K. Scherer (Eds.), Advances in the social psychology of language (pp.123-158). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16. Keenan, J. M., Potts, G. R., Golding, J. M., & Jennings, T. M. (1990). Which elaborative inferences are drawn during reading? A question of methodologies. In D. A. Balota, F. d'Arcais & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading. Hove: LEA.
17. Kintsch, W. (1988). The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
18. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1990). Dimensions of inference. In A. C. Graesser & G. H. Bower (Eds.), Inferences and text comprehension. London: Academic Press.
19. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inferences during reading. Psychological Review, 99,440-446.
20. Martins & Le Bouedec (1998). La production inférences lors de la comprehension de textes chez les adultes: Une analyse de la literature. L'Année Psychologique, 98, 511-543.
21. Miall, D. S. (1989). Beyond the schema given: Affective comprehension of literary narratives. Cognition and Emotion, 3(1), 55-78.
22. Oatley, K. (1998). Emotion. The Psychologist, 11(6), 285-288.
23. Rapp, D. N., Gerrig, R. J., & Prentice, D. A. (2001). Readers' trait-based models of characters in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(4), 737-750.
24. Trabasso, T., van den broek, P., & Suh, S. Y. (1989). Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in stories. Discourse Processes, 12(1), 1-25.
25. Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing - use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(3), 285-318.
26. van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T. (1998). The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the on-line construction of a memoty representation. In S. R. Goldman & H. van Oostendorp (Eds.), The construction of mental representation during reading (pp. 71-98). Mahwah: N.J. Erlbaum.