Stream restoration practices in the southeastern United States

Restoration Ecology

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 573-583

  Sudduth, Elizabeth B ^a,b   Meyer, Judy L ^a   Bernhardt, Emily S ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Bldg 142   (United States)

Author keywords

Channel reconfiguration; Evaluation; In stream habitat improvement; Monitoring; Riparian management; Southeastern United States; Stream restoration; Water quality management

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; HABITAT RESTORATION; MONITORING; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; STREAM; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHED;

GEORGIA; KENTUCKY; NORTH AMERICA; NORTH CAROLINA; SOUTH CAROLINA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34547432475     PISSN: 10612971     EISSN: 1526100X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00252.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bernhardt, E. S., M. A. Palmer, J. D. Allan, G. Alexander, K. Barnas, S. S. Brooks, et al. 2005. Synthesizing US river restoration efforts. Science 308: 636-637.
2. Bernhardt, E. S., E. B. Sudduth, M. A. Palmer, J. D. Allan, J. L. Meyer, G. Alexander, et al. 2007. Restoring rivers one reach at a time: Results from a survey of U.S. river restoration practitioners. Restoration Ecology 15: 482-493.
3. Booth, D. B. 2005. Challenges and prospects for restoring urban streams: a perspective from the Pacific Northwest of North America. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24: 724-737.
4. D'Ignazio, J., K. McDermott, B. Gilmore, and C. Russo. 2005. North Carolina's Ecosystem Enhancement Program-mitigation for the future. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1941: 175-183.
5. Kondolf, G. M. 1998. Lessons learned from river restoration projects in California. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8: 39-52.
6. Kondolf, G. M., H. Piegay, and N. Landon. 2002. Channel response to increased and decreased bedload supply from land use change: Contrasts between two catchments. Geomorphology 45: 35-51.
7. Lydeard, C., and R. L. Mayden. 1995. A diverse and endangered aquatic ecosystem of the Southeast United States. Conservation Biology 9: 800-805.
8. NCCWMTF (North Carolina Clean Water Management Trust Fund). 2006. (available from http://www.cwmtf.net/) accessed 6 December 2006.
9. NCDENR (North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources). 2003a. Ecological Functions of Restored Stream Systems: Benthic Macroinvertebrates-Final Report for EPA Wetland Program Development Grant Grant # CD984487-98. North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources, Raleigh.
10. NCDENR (North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources). 2003b. North Carolina Water Quality Assessment and Impaired Waters List (2002 Integrated 305(b) and 303(d) Report). North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh.
11. NCEEP (North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program). 2006. (available from http://www.nceep.net/) accessed 6 December 2006.
12. Palmer, M. A., E. S. Bernhardt, J. D. Allan, P. S. Lake, G. Alexander, S. Brooks, et al. 2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 208-217.
13. Perry, M. 2002. Population growth in the 1990s: Patterns within the United States. Population Research and Policy Review 21: 55-71.
14. USEPA, 2002USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2002. National assessment database for water quality (available from http://www.epa.gov/ waters/305b/index.html) accessed 30 January 2006.