Assessment of clean development mechanism potential of large-scale energy efficiency measures in heavy industries

Energy

Volumn 32, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 1917-1931

  Hayashi, Daisuke ^a   Krey, Matthias ^a  

^a Perspectives GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Clean development mechanism; Energy efficiency; Heavy industry; Kyoto Protocol

Indexed keywords

BASIC OXYGEN CONVERTERS; COKE; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; GAS EMISSIONS; IRON; PAPER AND PULP INDUSTRY; QUENCHING; STEEL; TURBINES;

ADDITIONALITY TEST; CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM; KYOTO PROTOCOL; TOP PRESSURE RECOVERY TURBINE;

INDUSTRIAL PLANTS;

BASIC OXYGEN CONVERTERS; COKE; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; GAS EMISSIONS; INDUSTRIAL PLANTS; IRON; PAPER AND PULP INDUSTRY; QUENCHING; STEEL; TURBINES;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; KYOTO PROTOCOL; MEASUREMENT METHOD; PRIMARY SECTOR INDUSTRY;

COKE; IRON; QUENCHING; STEEL; TURBINES;

ASIA; BRAZIL; EURASIA; INDIA; SOUTH AMERICA; SOUTH ASIA;

EID: 34547429480     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2007.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Hasselknippe H., and Røine K. Carbon 2006 (2006), Point Carbon, Oslo
2. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Technological and economic potential of greenhouse gas emissions reduction. In: Metz B., and Davidson O. (Eds). IPCC third assessment report, Climate Change 2001: Mitigation (2001), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 167-300
3. Michaelowa A., Stronzik M., Eckermann F., and Hunt A. Transaction costs of the Kyoto mechanisms. Clim Policy 3 (2003) 261-278
4. Michaelowa A., and Jotzo F. Transaction costs, institutional rigidities and the size of the clean development mechanism. Energy Policy 33 4 (2005) 511-523
5. Clean Development Mechanism Executive Board. Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality (version 03). Bonn: UNFCCC; 2007. See also: 〈http://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/PAmethodologies/AdditionalityTools/Additionality_tool.pdf〉.
6. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Geneva: IPCC; 2006. See also: 〈http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.htm〉.
7. Clean Development Mechanism Executive Board. Consolidated baseline methodology for grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources (version 06). Bonn: UNFCCC; 2006. See also: 〈http://cdm.unfccc.int/UserManagement/FileStorage/CDMWF_AM_BW759ID58ST5YEEV6WUCN5744MN763〉.
8. 2 baseline database for the Indian power sector. New Delhi: CEA; 2006. See also: 〈http://www.cea.nic.in/planning/c%20and%20e/Government%20of%20India%20website.htm〉.
9. Clean Development Mechanism Executive Board. Project design document: Moema Bagasse cogeneration project (MBCP). Bonn: UNFCCC; 2006. See also: 〈http://cdm.unfccc.int/Projects/DB/TUEV-SUED1135078012.82/view.html〉.
10. Worrell E, Martin N, Lynn P. Energy efficiency and carbon dioxide emissions reduction opportunities in the U.S. iron and steel sector, LBNL 41724. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California Berkeley; 1999.
11. Stelco. Present and future use of energy in the Canadian steel industry. Ottawa: Stelco; 1993.
12. Martin N, Worrell E, Ruth M, Price L, Elliott RN, Shipley AM, et al. Emerging energy-efficient industrial technologies, LBNL 46990. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California Berkeley; 2000.
13. Worrell E, Galitsky C. Energy efficiency improvement opportunities for cement making: an ENERGY STAR guide for energy and plant managers, LBNL 54036. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California Berkeley; 2004.
14. Ruth M, Worrell E, Price L. Evaluating clean development mechanism projects in the cement industry using a process-step benchmarking approach, LBNL 45346. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California Berkley; 2000.
15. Schwarz H.G., Briem S., and Zapp P. Future carbon dioxide emissions in the global material flow of primary aluminium. Energy 26 (2001) 775-795
16. Martin N, Anglani N, Einstein D, Khrushch M, Worrell E, Price L. Opportunities to improve energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S. pulp and paper industry, LBNL 46141. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California Berkeley; 2000.
17. De Beer J.G., Worrell E., and Blok K. Long-term energy-efficiency improvements in the paper and board industry. Energy 1 23 (1998) 21-42
18. Rafiqul I., Weber C., Lehmann B., and Voss A. Energy efficiency improvements in ammonia production: perspectives and uncertainties. Energy 30 (2005) 2487-2504
19. Mohanty B. Technology, energy efficiency and environmental externalities in the cement industry (1997), School of Environment, Resources and Development Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok
20. Clean Development Mechanism Executive Board. Project design document: optimal utilization of clinker project at Shree Cement Limited (SCL), Beawar, Rajasthan. Bonn: UNFCCC; 2006. See also: 〈http://cdm.unfccc.int/UserManagement/FileStorage/WWEH2S0UKXNI1UT6LEIKD4EIGF8IXD〉.
21. International Aluminium Institute. Perfluorocarbon emissions reduction programme 1990-2000 (2001), IAI, London
22. Mohanty B. Technology, energy efficiency and environmental externalities in the pulp and paper industry (1997), School of Environment, Resources and Development, Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok
23. Lu W. China medium and long term energy conservation plan. Beijing: CTI industry joint seminar on technology diffusion of energy efficiency in Asian countries; 2005. See also: 〈http://www.climatetech.net/events/Index.cfm?Page=1&EventsID=3916〉.
24. Schmid C, Brakhage A, Radgen P, Layer G, Arndt U, Carter J, et al. Möglichkeiten, Potenziale, Hemmnisse und Instrumente zur Senkung des Energieverbrauchs branchenübergreifender Techniken in den Bereichen Industrie und Kleinverbrauch. Karlsruhe/München: Institut Systemtechnik und Innovationsforschung/Forschungsstelle für Energiewirtschaft e.V.; 2003.
25. Bessette R. Energy efficiency and industrial boiler efficiency: an industry perspective. Steam Dig (2002) 5-16
26. Khrushch M, Worrell E, Price L, Martin N, Einstein D. Carbon emissions reduction potential in the U.S. chemicals and pulp and paper industries by applying CHP technologies, LBNL 43739. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California Berkeley; 1999.
27. Energy Technology Support Unit. Good practice guide 43: introduction to large-scale combined heat and power (1999), UK Department of Trade and Industry, London
28. Galitsky C, Martin N, Worell E, Lehman B. Energy efficiency improvements and cost saving opportunities for breweries: an ENERGY STAR guide for energy and plant managers, LBNL 50934. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California Berkeley; 2003.
29. The Energy and Resources Institute. CDM implementation in India: the national strategy study (2005), TERI, New Delhi
30. International Energy Agency. Energy statistics of non-OECD countries 2002-2003 (2005), IEA, Paris
31. International Iron and Steel Institute. World steel in figures 2005 (2005), IISI, Brussels
32. Price L, Phylipsen D, Worrell E. Energy use and carbon dioxide emissions in the steel sector in key developing countries, LBNL 46987. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California Berkeley; 2001.
33. Ministério de Minas e Energia. Brazilian energy balance 2004 (2004), Ministério de Minas e Energia, Brasília
34. Worrell E., Price L., Martin N., Hendriks C., and Meida L.O. Carbon dioxide emissions from the global cement industry. Annl Rev Energy Environ 26 (2001) 303-329
35. Associação Brasileira do Alumínio. Sustainability report aluminium industry (2005), ABAL, São Paulo
36. 2 CDM projects. In: Montini M, editor. University of Siena 2006 The Kyoto Protocol and beyond: A legal perspective, Siena, Italy. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing; 2007. Forthcoming.
37. Yamaguchi M. CDM potential in the power-generation and energy-intensive industries of China. Clim Policy 5 (2005) 167-184
38. Tanaka K., and Kudo H. Sectoral evaluation of the utilization potential of energy efficient technology (2005), The Institute of Energy Economics, Japan, Tokyo
39. Zhiping L., Jingru L., and Yanjia W. Energy consumption in the iron and steel industry in P.R. China. Energy Sustainable Dev 3 3 (1996) 18-24
40. Stainlay R. Australian LV coal producers: proven performance; but where to next? Brisbane: Jellinbah Resources; 2004. see also: 〈http://www.jellinbah.com.au/LibraryFiles/Australian%20lV%20coal%20Producers;%20Presentation.pdf〉.
41. SMS DEMAG AG. Personal communication on January 11, 2006.
42. International Aluminium Institute. The IAI's report on the aluminium industry's global perfluorocarbon gas emissions reduction programme: results of the 2003 anode effect survey (2005), IAI, London