Perceiving the actions of other people

Ecological Psychology

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 107-136

  Mark, Leonard S ^a  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547418070     PISSN: 10407413     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70, (9, Whole No. 416).
2. Baron, R. M. (1980). Contrasting approaches to social knowing: An ecological perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 591-600.
3. Baron, R. M. (1981). Social knowing from an ecological perspective: A consideration of the relative domains of power for cognitive and perceptual modes of knowing. In J. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment, 61- 80. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Inc.
4. Carello, C., Grosofsky, A., Reichel, F. D., Solomon, H. Y., & Turvey, M. T. (1989). Visually perceiving what is reachable. Ecological Psychology, 1, 27-54.
5. Cesari, P., & Newell, K. M. (1999). The scaling of human grip configuration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 927-935.
6. Cesari, P., & Newell, K.M. (2000b). Body-scaled transitions in human grip configurations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1657-1668.
7. Choi, H. J., & Mark, L. S. (2004). Scaling affordances for human reach actions. Human Movement Science, 23, 785-806.
8. Gardner, D. L., Mark, L. S., Ward, J. A., & Edkins, H. (2001). How do task characteristics affect the transitions between seated and standing reaches? Ecological Psychology, 13, 245-274.
9. Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. (Original work published 1979)
10. Heft, H. (1993). A methodological note on overestimates of reaching distance. Ecological Psychology, 5, 255-271.
11. Hodges, B. H., & Geyer, A. L. (2006). A nonconformist account of the Asch experiments: Values, pragmatics, and moral dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 2-19.
12. Hodges, B. H., & Lindhiem, O. (2006). Carrying babies and groceries: The effect of moral and social weight on caring. Ecological Psychology, 14, 127-139.
13. Hodges, B. H. (2007). Values define fileds: The International dynamics of driving, carrying, leading, negotiating, andconverging. Ecological Psychology, 19, 153-178.
14. Isenhower, R., W., Marsh, K. L., Carello, C., Baron, R. M., & Richardson, M. J. (2005). The specificity of intrapersonal and interpersonal affordance boundaries: Intrinsic versus extrinsic metrics. In H. Heft & K. Marsh (Eds.), Studies in Perception and Action VII (pp. 54-58). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
15. Jiang, Y., & Mark, L. S. (1994). The effect of gap depth on the perception of whether a gap is crossable. Perception and Psychophysics, 56, 691-700.
16. Knowles, P. L., & Smith, D. L. (1982). The ecological perspective applied to social perception: Revision of a working paper. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 12, 53-78.
17. Konczak, J., Meeuwsen, H. J., & Cress, M. E. (1992). Changing affordances in stair climbing: The perception of maximum climbability in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 691-697.
18. Lowe, C. A., & Kassin, S. M. (1980). A perceptual view of attribution: Theoretical and methodological implications. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 532-542.
19. Mark, L. S. (1987). Eye-height - scaled information about affordances: A study of sitting and stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 361-370.
20. Mark, L. S. (1995). Perceiving the preferred critical boundary for an affordance. In R. Bootsma & B. Bardy (Eds.), Studies in perception and action 111 (pp. 183-186). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
21. Mark, L. S., Balliett, J. A., Craver, K. D., Douglas, S. D., & Fox, T. (1990). What an actor must do in order to perceive the affordance for sitting. Ecological Psychology, 2, 325-366.
22. Mark, L. S., Jiang, Y., King, S. S., & Paasche, J. (1999). The impact of visual exploration on judgments of whether a gap is crossable. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 287-295.
23. Mark, L. S., Nemeth, K., Gardner, D., Dainoff, M. J., Duffy, M., & Grandt, K. (1997). Postural dynamics and the preferred critical boundary for visually-guided reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1-15.
24. Mark, L. S., Shaw, R. E., & Pittenger, J. B. (1988). Natural constraints, scales of analysis and perceptual information about growing faces. In T. R. Alley (Ed.), Social and applied aspects of faces (pp. 11-49). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
25. Mark, L. S., & Vogele, D. (1987). A biodynamic basis for perceived categories of action: A study of sitting and stair climbing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19, 367-384.
26. McArthur, L. Z., & Baron, R. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90, 215-238.
27. Michaels, C., & Beek, P. (1995). The state of ecological psychology. Ecological Psychology, 7, 259-278..
28. Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
29. Neisser, U. (1980). On social knowing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 601-605.
30. Newell, K. M., Scully, D. M., Tennebaum, F., & Hardiman, S. (1989). Body scale and the development of prehension. Developmental Psychobiology, 22, 1-14.
31. Pufall, P. B., & Dunbar, C. (1992). Perceiving whether or not the world affords stepping onto and over: A developmental study. Ecological Psychology, 4, 17-38.
32. Rochat, P. (1995) Perceived reachability for selfand for others by 3- to 5- year-old children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 59, 317-333.
33. Runeson, S. (1977/1983). On visual perception of dynamic events. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis: Studia Psychologia Vpsaliensia (Serial No. 9).
34. Runeson, S, & Frykholm, G. (1981). Visual perception of lifted weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 733-740.
35. Runeson, S, & Frykholm, G. (1983). Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 85-615.
36. Stasik, S., & Mark, L. S. (2005). Comfort as a determinant of the location of critical boundaries in the act of reaching. In H. Heft & K. Marsh (Eds.), Studies in Perception and Action VII (pp. 23-27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
37. Stewart, C. B., Jiang, Y., & Mark, L. S. (1993). The effects of goal-directedness and task constraints on perception and action. In S. S. Valenti & J. B. Pittenger (Eds.), Studies in perception and action II (pp. 183-186). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
38. Stoffregen, T. A., Gorday, K. M., Sheng, Y., & Flynn, S. B. (1999). Ferceiving affordances for another person's actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 120-136.
39. Van Acker, R., & Valenti, S.S. (1989). Ferception of social affordances by children with mild handicapping conditions: Implications for social skills research and training. Ecological Psychology, 1,383-405.
40. Warren, W. H. (1984). Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 683-703.
41. Warren, W. H., & Whang, S. (1987). Visual guidance of walking through apertures: Body-scaled information for affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 371-383.