Performance of an immersed membrane bioreactor (IMBR)

Desalination

Volumn 214, Issue 1-3, 2007, Pages 112-127

  Al Malack, Muhammad H ^a  

^a KING FAHD UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM AND MINERALS   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

COD removal; Effect oftoxicants; Immersed membrane bioreactor; Shock loading; Sludge production rate

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; PHENOLS; REMOVAL; SEWAGE SLUDGE; WASTE DISPOSAL; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

IMMERSED MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; SHOCK LOADING; SLUDGE PRODUCTION RATE;

BIOREACTORS;

BIOREACTORS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; PHENOLS; REMOVAL; SEWAGE SLUDGE; WASTE DISPOSAL; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

BIOREACTOR; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CHROMIUM; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; MEMBRANE; PHENOL; SLUDGE; WASTEWATER;

EID: 34547416696     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.06.023     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. N. Engelhardt, W. Firk and W. Warnken, Integration of membrane filtration into the activated sludge process in municipal wastewater treatment, IAWQ 19th International Conf., Vancouver, Canada, 1998, pp. 190-197.
2. Bailey A.D., Hansford G.S., and Dold P.L. The useof crossflow microfiltration to enhance the performance of an activated sludge reactor. Water Res. 28 (1994) 297-301
3. Chiemchaisri C., Yamamoto C.K., and Vigneswaran S. Household membrane bioreactor in domestic wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Technol. (1993) 27
4. Muller E.B., Stouthamber A.H., Verseveld H.W., and Eikelboom D.H. Aerobic domestic wastewater treatment in a pilot plant with complete sludge retention by crossflow filtration. Water Res. 29 4 (1995) 1179-1189
5. Brindle K., and Stephenson T. The application of membrane biological reactors for the treatment of wastewaters. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 49 (1996) 601-610
6. Ueda T., Hata K., and Kikuoka Y. Treatment of domestic sewage from rural settlements by a membrane bioreactor. Water Sci. Technol. 34 9 (1996) 189-196
7. W.J. Davies, M.S. Le and C.R. Heath, Intensified activated sludge process with submerged membrane microfiltration, Proc. IAWQ 19th International Conference, Vancouver, Canada, 1998, pp. 182-189.
8. Wagner J., and Rosenwinkel K.H. Sludge production in membrane bioreactors under different conditions. Water Sci. Technol. 41 10-11 (2000) 251-258
9. Cote P., Buisson H., Pound C., and Arakaki G. Immersed membrane activated sludge for the reuse of municipal wastewater. Desalination 113 (1997) 189-196
10. Zhang B., Yamamoto K., Ohgaki S., and Kamiko N. Floc size distribution and bacterial activities in hollow fiber microfiltration membrane used in membrane bioreactor for domestic wastewater treatment. Water Res. 30 (1996) 2385
11. Krauth Kh., and Staab K.F. Pressurized bioreactor with membrane filtration for wastewater treatment. Water Res. 66 2 (1993) 405-411
12. H. Ishida, Y. Yamada, M. Tsuboi and S. Matsumura, Submerged membrane activated sludge process (SMASP) - Its application into activated sludgeprocess with high concentration of MLSS, Proc. 2nd International Conference on Advances in Water and Effluent Treatment, 1993, pp. 321-330.
13. Chaize S., and Huyard A. Membrane bioreactor ondomestic wastewater treatment sludge production and modelling approach. Water Sci. Technol. 23 (1991) 1591-1600
14. Kishino H., Ishida H., Iwabu H., and Nakano I. Domestic wastewater reuse using a submerged membrane bioreactor. Desalination 106 (1995) 115-119
15. Kurama H., Poetzschke J., and Haseneder R. The application of membrane filtration for the removal of ammonium ions from potable water. Water Res. 36 11 (2002) 2905-2909
16. Chiemchaisri C., Wong Y.K., Urase T., and Yamamoto K. Organic stabilization and nitrogen removal in membrane separation bioreactor for domestic wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 25 10 (1992) 231-240
17. Winnen H., Suidan M.T., Scarpino P.V., Wrenn B., Cicek N., Urbain V., and Manem J. Effectiveness of the membrane bioreactor in the biodegradation of high molecular-weight compounds. Water Sci.Technol. 34 9 (1996) 197-203
18. Dufresne R., Lavallee H.C., Lebrun R.C., and Lo S.N. Comparison of performance between membrane bioreactor and activated sludge system for the treatment of pulping process wastewaters. TAPPI J. 81 4 (1998) 131-135
19. M.T. Suidan, Use of membrane reactors for the effective treatment and reuse of wastewater, 3rd Annual workshop on water conservation in the kingdom, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, 2000, pp. B7.1-B7.6.
20. Bouhabila E., Ben Aim R., and Buisson H. Fouling characterisation in membrane bioreactors. Sep. Purif. Technol. 22-3 1-3 (2001) 123-132
21. Buisson H., Cote P., Praderie M., and Paillard H. The use of immersed membranes for upgrading waste-water treatment plants. Water Sci. Technol. 37 9 (1998) 89-95
22. Canales A., Pareilleux A., Rols J.L., Goma G., and Huyard A. Decreased sludge production strategy for domestic wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 30 8 (1994) 97-106
23. Sun D.D., Zeng J.L., and Tay J.H. A submerged tubular ceramic membrane bioreactor for high strength wastewater treatment. Wat Sci. Technol. 47 1 (2003) 105-111
24. Innocenti L., Bolzonella D., Pavan P., and Cecchi F. Effect of sludge age on the performance of a membrane bioreactor: influence on nutrient and metals removal. Desalination 146 (2002) 467-474
25. Pollice A., Laera G., and Blonda M. Biomass growth and activity in a membrane bioraector with complete sludge retention. Water Res. 38 7 (2004) 1799-1808
26. Trouve E., Urbain V., and Manem J. Treatment of municipal wastewater by a membrane bioreactor - results of a semiindustrial pilot-scale study. Water Sci. Technol. 30 4 (1994) 151-157
27. Riesmeier B., Kroner B., and Kura M.R. Tangential filtration of microbial suspensions, filtration resistances and model development. J. Biotechnol. 12 (1989) 153-171
28. Matsumoto Y., Totsuka Y., Yamamoto S., Kawashima Y., Ochi A., and Miyanchi K. Crossflow filtration of thermophilic night-soil fermentation suspension. Kagakukogaku Ronbunshu 16 (1990) 197-203
29. M.H. Al-Malack, Application of dynamic membranes to crossflow microfiltration of secondary effluent, Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 1993.
30. Zang M., and Song L. Pressure-dependent permeate flux in ultra and microfiltraion. J. Environ. Eng. 126 7 (2000) 667-674
31. Hwang E.J., Sun D.D., and Tay J.H. Operational factors of submerged inorganic membrane bioreactor for organic wastewater treatment: sludge concentration and aeration rate. Water Sci. Technol. 47 1 (2003) 121-126
32. Bai R.B., and Leow H.F. Microfiltration of activated sludge wastewater - the effect of system operation parameters. Sep. Purif. Technol. 29 2 (2002) 189-198
33. Rosenberger S., Kruger U., Witzig R., Manz W., Szewzyk U., and Kraume M. Performance of a bioreactor with submerged membranes for aerobic treatment of municipal waste water. Water Res. 36 2 (2002) 413-420
34. Ogoshi M., and Suzuki Y. Application of MBR to an easily installed municipal wastewater treatment plant. Water Sci. Technol. 41 10-11 (2000) 287-293
35. Gander M.A., Jefferson B., and Judd S.J. Membrane bioreactors for use in small wastewater treatment plants: Membrane materials and effluent quality. Water Sci. Technol. 41 1 (2000) 205-211
36. APHA, AWWA, and WEF, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 17th ed., American Public Health Association, Washington DC, 1998.
37. Yamagishi T., Leite J., Ueda S., Yamaguchi F., and Suwa Y. Simultaneous removal of phenol and ammonia by an activated sludge process with crossflow filtration. Water Res. 35 13 (2001) 3089-3096