The impact of vegetation on hydraulic conductivity of sandy soil

Soil and Water Research

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 59-66

  Lichner, L'Ubomír ^a   Orfánus, Tomáš ^a   Nováková, Katarína ^b   Miloslav, S I R ^c   Tesař, Miroslav ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF CHEMISTRY   (Slovakia)

^b Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute   (Slovakia)

^c INSTITUTE OF HYDRODYNAMICS   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Hydraulic conductivity; Sandy soil; Vegetation; Water repellency

Indexed keywords

PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 34547416229     PISSN: 18015395     EISSN: 18059384     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17221/2115-swr     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. BUCZKO U., BENS O., FISCHER H., HÜTTL R.F. (2002): Water repellency in sandy luvisols under different forest transformation stages in northeast Germany. Geoderma, 109: 1-18.
2. CLOTHIER B.E., VOGELER I., MAGESAN G.N. (2000): The breakdown of water repellency and solute transport through a hydrophobic soil. Journal of Hydrology, 231-232: 255-264.
3. CZACHOR H. (2006): Modelling the effect of pore structure and wetting angles on capillary rise in soils having different wettabilities. Journal of Hydrology, 328: 604-613.
4. CZARNES S., HALLETT P.D., BENGOUGH A.G., YOUNG I.M. (2000): Root- and microbial-derived mucilages affect soil structure and water transport. European Journal of Soil Science, 51:435-443.
5. Decagon (2005): Minidisk Infiltrometer User's Manual. Decagon Devices, Inc., Pullman.
6. DEKKER L.W., DOERR S.H., OOSTINDIE K., ZIOGAS A.K., RITSEMA C.J. (2001): Water repellency and critical soil water content in a dune sand. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 65: 1667-1674.
7. DOERR S.H. (1998): On standardizing the "Water Drop Penetration Time" and the "Molarity of an Ethanol Droplet" techniques to classify soil hydrophobicity: a case study using medium textured soils. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 23: 663-668.
8. DOERR S.H., SHAKESBY R.A., WALSH R.P.D. (2000): Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance. Earth-Science Reviews, 51: 33-65.
9. DOMSCH K.H., GAMS W., ANDERSON T.H. (1980): Compendium of Soil Fungi. Academic Press, London.
10. DOSTÀL J. (1991): Key for Determination of Vascular Plants I. Slovenské pedagogické nakladatel'stvo, Bratislava, (in Slovak)
11. DOSTÁL J. (1992): Key for Determination of Vascular Plants II. Slovenské pedagogické nakladatel'stvo, Bratislava, (in Slovak)
12. nd Ed. Springer, Berlin, 315-325.
13. HARDY J.T. (2003): Climate Change. Causes, Effects, and Solutions. Wiley, Chichester.
14. KALIVODOVÁ E., KUBÍČ F., BEDRNA Z., KALIVODA H., GAVLAS V., KOLLÁR J., GAJDOŠ P., Š TEPANOVIČOVÁ O. (2002): Sand Dunes of Slovakia. Luka-Press, Bratislava, (in Slovak)
15. KUTÍLEK M., KREJČA M. (1987): A three-parameters infiltration equation of the Philip's type solution. Vodohospodářský časopis, 35: 52-61. (in Czech)
16. KUTILEK M., NIELSEN D.R. (1994): Soil Hydrology. Catena, Cremlingen-Destedt.
17. LICHNER L'., NIŽNANSKÁ Z., FAŠKO P., ŠÍR M., TESAŘ M. (2005): The impact of plant cover and weather on soil-hydrological parameters of a water repellent soil at the locality Mláky II at Sekule. Acta Hydrologica Slovaca, 6: 321-329. (in Slovak)
18. LICHNER E., DLAPA P., DOERR S.H., MATAIX-SOLERA J. (2006): Evaluation of different clay mineralogies as additives for soil water repellency alleviation. Applied Clay Science, 31: 238-248.
19. LICHNER L'., HALLETT P.D., FEENEY D., ĎUGOVÁ O., ŠÍR M., TESAŘ M. (2007): Field measurement of the impact of hydrophobicity on soil water transport under different vegetation over time. Biologia, Bratislava, (submitted)
20. MALLANTS D., MOHANTY B.P., VERVOORT A., FEYEN J. (1997): Spatial analysis of saturated hydraulic conductivity in a soil with macropores. Soil Technology, 10: 115-131.
21. MARHOLD K., HINDÁK F. (1998): Checklist of Non-Vascular and Vascular Plants of Slovakia. Veda, Bratislava, (in Slovak)
22. MCKISSOCK I., GILKES R.J., WALKER E.L. (2002): The reduction of water repellency by added clay as influenced by clay and soil properties. Applied Clay Science, 20: 225-241.
23. MITRA S., VIS E., KUMAR R., PLUMB R., FAM M. (2006): Wetting agent and cultural practices increase infiltration and reduce runoff losses of irrigation water. Biologia, Bratislava, 61 (Suppl. 19): S353-S357.
24. NYHOLM E. (1965): Ilustrated Moss Flora of Fenoscandia. Vol. II. Musci. Fasc. 5. CWK Gleerup, Lund, 407-647.
25. NYHOLM E. (1969): Ilustrated Moss Flora of Fenoscandia. Vol. II. Musci, Fasc. 6. Natural science research council, Stockholm.
26. PHILIP J.R. (1957): The theory of infiltration: 1. The infiltration equation and its solution. Soil Science, 83: 345-357.
27. ROPER M.M. (2006): Potential for remediation of water repellent soils by inoculation with wax-degrading bacteria in south-western Australia. Biologia, Bratislava, 61 (Suppl. 19): S358-S362.
28. SAMSON R.A., HOEKSTRA E.S., VAN OORSCHOT C.A.N. (1981): Introduction to Foot-Borne Fungi. Centraal voor Schimmelcultures, Baarn. (in Dutch)
29. Soil Survey Division Staff (1993): Soil Survey Manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18.
30. ŠÚTOR J. (1986): Spatial variability of soil hydraulic properties. Vodohospodársky Časopis, 34: 284-313. (in Slovak)
31. TOMILIN B.A. (1979): Guide to Fungi. Nauka, Leningrad, (in Russian)
32. WANG D., YATES S.R., LOWERY B., VAN GENUCHTEN M.TH. (1998): Estimating soil hydraulic properties using tension infiltrometers with varying disk diameters. Soil Science, 163: 356-361.
33. WATSON K.W., LUXMOORE R.J. (1986): Estimating macroporosity in a forest watershed by use of a tension infiltrometer. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 50: 578-582.
34. WRB (1994): World Reference Base for Soil Resources. Wageningen/Rome.
35. nd Ed. Springer, Berlin, 303-314.
36. YEH T.-C.J., GELHAR L.W., GUTJAHR A.L. (1985): Stochastic analysis of unsaturated flow in heterogeneous soils. 3. Observations and applications. Water Resources Research, 21: 465-471.
37. ZHANG R. (1997): Determination of soil sorptivity and hydraulic conductivity from the disk infiltrometer. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 61: 1024-1030.