Intimate partner violence, technology, and stalking

Violence Against Women

Volumn 13, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 842-856

  Southworth, Cynthia ^a   Finn, Jerry ^b   Dawson, Shawndell ^a   Fraser, Cynthia ^a   Tucker, Sarah ^a  

^a National Network to End Domestic Violence

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Cyberstalking; Intimate partner stalking; Technology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BATTERED WOMAN; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; PARTNER VIOLENCE; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS; TELECOMMUNICATION; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

BATTERED WOMEN; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SPOUSE ABUSE; TELECOMMUNICATIONS; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 34547413917     PISSN: 10778012     EISSN: 15528448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077801207302045     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bahm, T. (2003). Eliminating cyber-confusion. Retrieved January 15, 2005, from http://www.ncvc.org/src/main.aspx?dbName=DocumentViewerDocumentID=33500
2. Brewster, M.P. (2003). Power and control dynamics in prestalking and stalking situations. Journal of Family Violence, 18, 207-217.
3. Cell phone tech maintains privacy. (2004, January 19). Wired News. Retrieved July 20, 2004, from http://www.wired.com/news/wireless/0,1382,61965, 00.html
4. Cyber-Stalking.net. (2004). Overview on U.S. federal statutes or laws pertaining to cyberstalking. Retrieved February 7, 2004, from http://www.cyber-stalking.net/legal_usfederal.htm
5. D'Ovidio, R., Doyle, J. (2003). A study on cyberstalking: Understanding investigative hurdles. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 72 (3). 10-17.
6. Finn, J. (2004). A survey of online harassment at a university campus. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 468-483.
7. Finn, J., Banach, M. (2000). Victimization online: The downside of seeking services for women on the Internet. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 3, 776-785.
8. Fisher, B.S., Cullen, F.T., Turner, M.G. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
9. Fremouw, W.J., Westrup, D., Pennypacker, J. (1997). Stalking on campus: The prevalence and strategies for coping with stalking. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 42 (4). 666-669.
10. Givens, B. (2002). Public records on the Internet: The privacy dilemma. Retrieved July 20, 2004, from http://www.cfp2002.0rg/proceedings/proceedings/ givens.pdf
11. Greenfeld, L.A., Rand, M.R. (1998). Violence by intimates. Analysis of data on crimes by current or former spouses, boyfriends, and girlfriends. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
12. Gregoire, T.M. (2004). Cyberstalking: Dangers on the information superhighway. Retrieved July 21, 2004, from http://www.ncvc.org/src/main.aspx? dbID=DB_Cyberstalking814
13. H.E.S. v. J.C.S., 815 A.2d 405 (2003).
14. Kranz, A. (2001). Helpful or harmful? How innovative communication technology affects survivors of intimate violence. Retrieved July 19, 2004, from http://www.vaw.umn.edu/documents/5survivortech/5survivortech.html
15. Lee, R.K. (1998). Romantic and electronic stalking in a college context. William Mary Journal of Women and the Law, 4 (2). 373-409.
16. Man charged in Caller ID killing. (1995, March 30). Dallas Morning News, p. A33.
17. McGarth, M.G., Casey, E. (2002). Forensic psychiatry and the Internet: Practical perspectives on sexual predators and obsessional harassers in cyberspace. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 30, 81-94.
18. Medlin, A. (2002). Stalking to cyberstalking, a problem caused by the Internet. Retrieved February 7, 2004, from http://gsulaw.gsu.edu/lawand/papers/ fa02/medlin
19. Ogilvie, E. (2000). The Internet and cyberstalking. Sydney: Australian Institute of Criminology.
20. Orland, K. (2003, February 6). Stalker victims should check for GPS. Retrieved July 20, 2004, from http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/02/06/tech/ main539596.shtml
21. Privacy Rights Clearinghouse. (2002). Wireless communications: Voice and data privacy. Retrieved July 18, 2004, from http://www.privacyrights.org/fs/fs2- wire.htm
22. Rogers, L.E., Castleton, A., Lloyd, S.A. (1996). Relational control and physical aggression in satisfying marital relationships. In D. D. Cahn S. A. Lloyd (Eds.), Family violence from a communication perspective (pp. 218-239). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Safety Net. (2004). Technology, safety, and privacy issues for victims of domestic violence. Washington, DC: National Network to End Domestic Violence.
24. Southworth, C. (2002, May). Safety on the Internet (Violence Against Women on the Internet Online Course, Module 5). Retrieved February 19, 2005, from http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/vaw02/module5.html
25. Spence-Diehl, E. (2003). Stalking and technology: The double-edged sword. Journal of Technology and Human Services, 22 (1). 5-18.
26. Spitzberg, B.H., Hoobler, G. (2002). Cyberstalking and the technologies of interpersonal terrorism. New Media Society, 4, 71-92.
27. Stalking Resource Center. (2003). Stalking technology outpaces state laws. Stalking Resource Center Newsletter, 3 (2). 1, 4-5. Retrieved February 19, 2005, from http://www.ncvc.org/src/AGP.Net/Components/DocumentViewer/Download. aspxnz?DocumentID=33500
28. Texas Council on Family Violence. (2003). Information confidentiality held by governmental bodies. Legal history of the domestic violence movement. Retrieved April 12, 2007, fromhttp://www.tcfv.org/tcfv-content/policy.php? itemid=17
29. Tjaden, P., Thoennes, N. (1998). Stalking in America: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
30. U.S. Department of Justice. (1999). Cyberstalking: A new challenge for law enforcement and industry. Retrieved February 19, 2005, from http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/cyberstalking.htm
31. U.S. Department of Justice. (2001). Stalking and domestic violence: Report to congress. Retrieved April 12, 2007, from http://www.ncjrs.gov/ pdffiles1/ojp/186157.pdf
32. Walker, L.E.A. (1984). The battered woman syndrome. New York: Springer.
33. Wendland, M. (2001, September 6). Belleville man accused of electronic voyeurism. Detroit Free Press. Retrieved July 20, 2004, from http://www.freep.com/money/tech/spy6_20010906.htm
34. Westrup, D. (1998). Applying functional analysis to stalking behavior. In J. R. Meloy (Ed.), The psychology of stalking: Clinical and forensic perspectives (pp. 275-294). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
35. Working to Halt Online Abuse. (2004). Online harassment statistics. Retrieved July 18, 2004, from http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/stats/index. shtml
36. Working to Halt Online Abuse. (2005). Cyberstalking laws. Retrieved February 12, 2005, from http://www.haltabuse.org/resources/laws/index.shtml