A new generic approach for the modeling of fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) riser reactor

Chemical Engineering Science

Volumn 62, Issue 17, 2007, Pages 4510-4528

  Gupta, Raj Kumar ^a   Kumar, Vineet ^a   Srivastava, V K ^b  

^a THAPAR UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI   (India)

Author keywords

Computational fluid dynamics; Cracking kinetics; Fluid catalytic cracking; Mathematical modeling; Pseudocomponents; Simulation

Indexed keywords

CATALYST DEACTIVATION; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; KINETIC PARAMETERS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; RATE CONSTANTS; TWO PHASE FLOW;

BOILING PSEUDOCOMPONENTS; CONVENTIONAL LUMPED MODELS; GENERIC APPROACH; RISER REACTOR;

FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING;

CATALYST DEACTIVATION; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING; KINETIC PARAMETERS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; RATE CONSTANTS; TWO PHASE FLOW;

EID: 34547407872     PISSN: 00092509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2007.05.009     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ali H., Rohani S., and Corriou J.P. Modeling and control of a riser-type fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit. Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers 75 (1997) 410-412
2. Arastoopour H., and Gidaspow D. Vertical pneumatic conveying using four hydrodynamic models. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 18 (1979) 123-130
3. Arbel A., Huang Z., Rinard I.H., Shinnar R., and Sapre A.V. Dynamics and control of fluidized catalytic crackers. Modeling of the current generation FCC's. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 34 (1995) 1228-1243
4. Aris R. Reactions in continuous mixtures. A.I.Ch.E. Journal 35 (1989) 539-548
5. Austin G.T. Shreve's Chemical Process Industries. fifth ed (1984), McGraw-Hill, Singapore
6. Blasetti A., and de Lasa H. FCC riser unit operated in the heat-transfer mode: kinetic modeling. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 36 (1997) 3223-3229
7. Corella J., and Frances E. Analysis of the riser reactor of a fluid catalytic cracking unit: model based on kinetics of cracking and deactivation from laboratory tests. In: Occelli M.L. (Ed). Fluid Catalytic Cracking-II: Concepts in Catalyst Design, ACS Symposium Series vol. 452 (1991), American Chemical Society, Washington 165-182
8. Daubert T.E. Petroleum fraction distillation interconversions. Hydrocarbon Processing 73 (1994) 75-78
9. Daubert T.E. Evaluated equation forms for correlating thermodynamic and transport properties with temperature. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 37 (1998) 3260-3267
10. Derouin C., Nevicato D., Forissier M., Wild G., and Bernard J.R. Hydrodynamics of riser units and their impact on FCC operation. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 36 (1997) 4504-4515
11. Edmister, W.C., Lee, B.I., 1984. Applied Hydrocarbon Thermodynamics, vol. 1, second ed. Gulf Publishing, Houston.
12. Feng W., Vynckier E., and Froment G.F. Single event kinetics of catalytic cracking. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 32 (1993) 2997-3005
13. Fligner M., Schipper P.H., Sapre A.V., and Krambeck F.J. Two phase cluster model in riser reactors: impact of radial density distribution on yields. Chemical Engineering Science 49 (1994) 5813-5818
14. Gupta A., and Subba Rao D. Model for the performance of a fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) riser reactor: Effect of feed atomization. Chemical Engineering Science 56 (2001) 4489-4503
15. Gupta R., Kumar V., and Srivastava V.K. Modeling and simulation of fluid catalytic cracking unit. Reviews in Chemical Engineering 21 2 (2005) 95-131
16. Horio M., and Kuroki H. Three dimensional flow visualization of dilutely dispersed solids in bubbling and circulating fluidized beds. Chemical Engineering Science 49 (1994) 2413-2421
17. Kesler M.G., and Lee B.I. Improve prediction of enthalpy of fractions. Hydrocarbon Processing 55 (1976) 153-158
18. Kumar V., and Upadhyay S.N. Computer simulation of membrane processes: ultrafiltration and dialysis units. Computers and Chemical Engineering 23 (2000) 1713-1724
19. Lee L., Chen Y., Huang T., and Pan W. Four lump kinetic model for fluid catalytic cracking process. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 67 (1989) 615-619
20. Liguras D.K., and Allen D.T. Structural models for catalytic cracking. 1. Model compound reactions. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 28 (1989) 665-673
21. Liguras D.K., and Allen D.T. Structural models for catalytic cracking. 2. Reactions of simulated oil mixtures. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 28 (1989) 674-683
22. Markatos N.C., and Shinghal A.K. Numerical analysis of one-dimensional, two phase flow in a vertical cylindrical passage. Advance Engineering Software 4 (1982) 99
23. Martin M.P., Derouin P.T., Forissier M., Wild G., and Bernard J.R. Catalytic cracking in riser reactors. Core-annulus and elbow effects. Chemical Engineering Science 47 (1992) 2319-2324
24. Maxwell J.B. Data Book on Hydrocarbons (1968), Krieger, New York
25. Miquel J., and Castells F. Easy characterization of petroleum fractions. Hydrocarbon Processing 72 (1993) 101-105
26. Miquel J., and Castells F. Easy characterization of petroleum fractions. Hydrocarbon Processing 73 (1994) 99-103
27. Pekediz A., Kraemer D., Blasetti A., and de Lasa H. Heats of catalytic cracking. Determination in a riser simulator reactor. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 36 (1997) 4516-4522
28. Pitault I., Nevicato D., Frossier M., and Bernard J.R. Kinetic model based on a molecular description for catalytic cracking of vacuum gas oil. Chemical Engineering Science 49 (1994) 4249-4262
29. Pitault I., Forissier M., and Bernard J.R. Determination de constantes cinetiques du craquage catalytique par la modelisation du test de microactivite (MAT). The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 73 (1995) 498-503
30. Pugsley T.S., and Berruti F. A predictive hydrodynamic model for circulating fluidized bed risers. Powder Technology 89 (1996) 57-69
31. Quam R.J., and Jaffe S.B. Structure-oriented lumping: describing the chemistry of complex hydrocarbon mixtures. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 31 (1992) 2483-2497
32. Saltelli A. In: Chan K., and Scott E.M. (Eds). Sensitivity Analysis (2000), Wiley, New York
33. Stangeland B.E. A kinetic model for the prediction of hydrocracker yields. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Process Design & Development 13 1 (1974) 71-76
34. Subba Rao D. Clusters and lean phase behavior. Powder Technology 46 (1986) 101-107
35. Theologos K.N., and Markatos N.C. Advanced modeling of fluid catalytic cracking riser-type reactors. A.I.Ch.E. Journal 39 (1993) 1007-1017
36. Theologos K.N., Lygeros A.I., and Markatos N.C. Feedstock atomization effects on FCC riser reactors selectivity. Chemical Engineering Science 54 (1999) 5617-5625
37. Tsuo Y.P., and Gidaspow D. Computation of flow patterns in circulating fluidized beds. A.I.Ch.E. Journal 36 (1990) 885-896
38. Wang L., Yang B., and Wang Z. Lumps and kinetics for the secondary reactions in catalytically cracked gasoline. Chemical Engineering Journal 109 (2005) 1-9
39. Watson K.M., and Nelson E.F. Symposium on physical properties of hydrocarbon mixtures-improved methods for approximating critical and thermal properties of petroleum fractions. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 25 (1933) 880-887
40. Wilson J.W. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Technology and Operation (1997), PennWell Publishing Co, Tulsa, Oklahoma