Using position, fonts and cited references to retrieve scientific documents

Journal of Information Science

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 492-508

  Chen, Yen Liang ^a   Cheng, Li Chen ^a   Cheng, Yun Ling ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Cited reference; Features; Font; Information retrieval; Position; Scientific documents; Text

Indexed keywords

FEATURE EXTRACTION; INTEGRATED CONTROL; NATURAL SCIENCES COMPUTING; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; VECTORS;

CITED REFERENCE; SCIENTIFIC DOCUMENTS;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 34547401212     PISSN: 01655515     EISSN: 17416485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0165551506075324     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. A. Odlyzko, The rapid evolution of scholarly communication, Learned Publishing 15 (1) (2002) 7 19.
2. R. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto, Modern Information Retrieval ( ACM Press, New York, 1999 ).
3. G. Salton, Automatic Text Processing: The Transformation, Analysis and Retrieval of Information by Computer ( Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 1988 ).
4. G. Salton and M.E. Lesk, Computer evaluation of indexing and text processing, Journal of ACM 15 (1) (1968) 8 36.
5. G. Salton, The SMART Retrieval System ( Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1971 ).
6. G. Salton and C. Buckley, Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval, Information Processing and Management 24 (5) (1988) 513 23.
7. G. Salton and M.J. McGill, Text analysis and automatic indexing. In: G. Salton and M.J. McGill, Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval, (McGraw Hill, New York, 1983). 52 117.
8. K. Sparck-Jones, A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval, Journal of Documentation 28 (1) (1972) 11 21.
9. J.L. Herlocker, J.A. Konstan, A. Borchers, and J. Riedl, An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering. In: F. Gey et al. (eds), Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR'99) (ACM Press, New York, 1999) 23037.
10. G. Crookes, Towards a validated analysis of scientific text structure, Applied Linguistics 7 (1) (1986) 57 70.
11. S.J. Samuels, R. Tennyson, L. Sax, P. Mulcahy, N. Schermer, and H. Hayovy, Adults' use of text structure in the recall of a scientific journal article, Journal of Education Research 81 (3) (1988) 171 4.
12. S. Brin and L. Page, The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine, Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 30 (1 7) (1998) 107 17.
13. P.B. Baxendale, Man-made index for technical literature an experiment, IBM Journal of Research and Development 2 (4) (1958) 254 361.
14. C. Chen and L. Carr, Trailblazing the literature of hypertext: author co-citation analysis (19891998). In: J. Westbomke et al. (eds), Proceedings of the Tenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia: Returning to our Diverse Roots (ACM Press, Darmstadt, 1999) 5160.
15. G. Jeh and J. Widom, SimRank: a measure of structural-context similarity. In: O.R. Zaiane (ed.), Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (ACM Press, Edmonton, 2002) 53843.
16. M.M. Kessler, Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers, American Documentation 14 (1) (1963) 10 25.
17. A. Popescul, G. Flake, S. Lawrence, L.H. Ungar and C.L. Giles, Clustering and identifying temporal trends in document databases. In: N. Lal and E. Neuhold (eds), Proceedings of the IEEE Advances in Digital Libraries (ADL 2000) (IEEE, Washington, D.C., 2000) 17382.
18. H. Small, Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 24 (4) (1973) 265 9.
19. H. Small, Visualizing science by citation mapping, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50 (9) (1999) 799 813.
20. J.G. Kircz and F.A.P. Harmsze, Modular scenarios in the electronic age. In: P. van der Vet et al. (eds), Proceedings of Conferentie Informatiewetenschap (Doelen, Rotterdam, 2000) 3134.
21. J.G. Kircz, New practices for electronic publishing 1: will the scientific paper keep its form, Learned Publishing 14 (4) (2001) 265 72.
22. J.G. Kircz, New practices for electronic publishing 2: new forms of the scientific paper, Learned Publishing 15 (1) (2002) 27 32.
23. H.P. Edmundson, New methods in automatic extracting, Journal of the ACM 16 (2) (1969) 264 85.
24. H.V. Hans, New feature sets for summarization by sentence extraction, IEEE Intelligent Systems 18 (4) (2003) 34 42.
25. D.R. Radev, E.H. Hovy, and K. McKeown, Introduction to the special issue on summarization, Computational Linguistics 28 (4) (2002) 399 408.
26. T. Yoshimi, T. Okunishi, T. Yamaji and Y. Fukumochi, Evaluation of importance of sentences based on connectivity to title. In: T. Hirano (ed.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Volume 2 (ACM, Montreal, 1998) 14437.
27. E. Garfield, Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation, Science 178 (1972) 471 9.
28. M.H. MacRoberts and B.R. MacRoberts, Problems of citation analysis: a critical review, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 40 (5) (1989) 342 9.
29. M.H. MacRoberts and B.R. MacRoberts, Problems of citation analysis, Scientometrics 36 (3) (1996) 435 44.
30. S. Hill and F. Provost, The myth of the double-blind review? Author identification using only citations, ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 5 (2) (2003) 179 84.
31. J.M. Kleinberg, Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment, Journal of the ACM 46 (5) (1999) 604 32.
32. L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd, The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web. Technical Report ( Stanford Digital Library, 1998 ).
33. A. Strehl, J. Ghosh, and R. Mooney, Impact of similarity measures on web-page clustering. In: H. Kautz and B. Porter (eds), Proceedings of the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Web Search (AAAI, Austin, Texas, USA, 2000) 5864.
34. S.K.M. Wong, W. Ziarko, and P.C.N. Wong. Generalized vector space model in information retrieval. In: J.M. Tague (ed.), Proceedings of the 8th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (ACM, New York, 1985) 1825.
35. G.W. Furnas, S. Deerwester, S.T. Dumais, T.K. Landauer, R.A. Harshman, L.A. Streeter, and K.E. Lochbaum, Information retrieval using a singular value decomposition model of latent semantic structure. In: Y. Chiaramella (ed.), Proceedings of the 11th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (ACM Press, Grenoble, 1988) 46580.
36. M.W. Berry, Z. Drmac, and E.R. Jessup, Matrices, vector spaces, and information retrieval, SIAM Review 42 (2) (1999) 335 62.
37. P.J. Kalczynski and A. Chou, Temporal document retrieval model for business news archives, Information Processing Management 41 (3) (2005) 635 50.
38. A. Kontostathis and W.M. Pottenger, A framework for understanding Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI) performance, Information Processing Management 42 (1) (2006) 56 73.
39. X. Tai, F. Ren, and K. Kita, An information retrieval model based on vector space method by supervised learning, Information Processing Management 38 (6) (2002) 749 64.
40. S. Teufel and M. Moens, Summarizing scientific articles: experiments with relevance and rhetorical status, Computational Linguistics 28 (4) (2002) 409 45.
41. S. Dominich, PageRank: quantitative model of interaction information retrieval. In: G. Hencsey and B. White (eds), Proceedings of the 12th International World Wide Web Conference WWW '03 International Workshop on Mobile Web Technologies WF7. World Wide Web Consortium WWW-C (IEEE, Budapest, 2003) 1318.
42. L. Leydesdorff, Words and co-words as indicators of intellectual organization, Research Policy 18 (1989) 209 23.
43. D. Griffiths, A pragmatic approach to Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, Teaching Statistics 2 (1980) 10 13.