Annotation inference for safety certification of automatically generated code (extended abstract)

Proceedings - 21st IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 265-268

  Denney, Ewen ^a   Fischer, Bernd ^b  

^a NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547395281     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ASE.2006.15     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. http://www.mathworks.com/products/rtw.
2. E. Denney and B. Fischer. Correctness of source-level safety policies. FM 2003, LNCS 2805, 894-913.
3. E. Denney and B. Fischer. Certifiable program generation. GPCE 2005, LNCS 3676, 17-28.
4. M. Ernst et al. Dynamically discovering likely program invariants to support program evolution. IEEE TSE, 27(2): 1-25, 2001.
5. B. Fischer and J. Schumann. AutoBayes: A system for generating data analysis programs from statistical models. JFP, 13(3):483-508, 2003.
6. C. Flanagan and R. Leino. Houdini, an annotation assistant for ESC/Java. FM 2001, LNCS 2021, 500-517.
7. G. Necula. Proof-carrying code. POPL-24, 106-119, 1997.
8. I. Stürmer et al. Overview of existing safeguarding techniques for automatically generated code. SIGSOFT SEN, 30(4): 1-6, 2005.
9. B. Wegbreit. The synthesis of loop predicates. CACM, 17(2):102-112, 1974.
10. J. Whittle and J. Schumann. Automating the implementation of Kalman filter algorithms. ACM TMS, 30(4):434-453, 2004.