What is the value of minimizing access trauma for patients?;Was Bringt die Minimalisierung des Zugangstraumas für den Patienten

Chirurg

Volumn 78, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 494-500

  Hildebrand, P ^a   Roblick, U J ^a   Keller, R ^a   Kleemann, M ^a   Mirow, L ^a   Bruch, H P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Laparoscopy; Minor access surgery; Patient comfort; Reduction of access trauma

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INGUINAL HERNIA; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; META ANALYSIS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TIME;

CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; CLINICAL TRIALS; COLON; CONVALESCENCE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HERNIA, INGUINAL; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; META-ANALYSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34547373865     PISSN: 00094722     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00104-007-1348-y     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alabaz O, Iroatulam A, Nessim A et al (2000) Comparison of laparoscopic assisted and conventional ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease, Eur J Surg 166(3): 213-217
2. Audebert AJ, Gomel V (2000) Role of microlaparoscopy in the diagnosis of peritoneal and visceral adhesions and in the prevention of bowel injury associated with blind trocar insertion. Fertil Steril 73: 631-635
3. Bloechle C, Emmermann A, Strate T, Scheurlen UJ (1998). Laparoscopic vs. open repair of gastric perforation and abdominal lavage of associated peritonitis in pigs. Surg Endosc 12(3): 212-218
4. Böhm B, Milsom JW, Fazio V (1995). Postoperative intestinal motility following conventional and laparoscopic intestinal suregry. Arch Surg 130(4): 415-419
5. Braga M, Gianotti L, Vignali A, Carlo VD (2002) Preoperative oral arginine and n-3 fatty acid supplementation improves the immunometabolic host response and outcomes after colorectal resection for cancer. Surgery 132:805-814
6. Breukink S, Pierie J, Wiggers T (2006) Laparoscopic vs. open total mesorectal exision for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18: CD005200
7. Burpee SE, Kurian M, Murakame Y et al. (2002) The metabolic and immune responseto laparoscopic vs. open liver resection. Surg Endosc 16: 899-904
8. Condon ET, Barry BD, Wang JH et al. (2007) Laparoscopic surgery protects against the oncologic adverse effects of open surgery by attenuating endothelial progenitor cell mobilization. Surg Endosc 21: 87-90
9. Coshun I, Hatipoglu AR, Topaloglu A et al. (2000) Laparoscopic vs. open cholecystectomy: effect on pulmonary function tests. Hepatogastroenterology 47: 341-342
10. De Wilde RL (1991) Goodbye to late bowel obstruction after appendectomy. Lancet 338: 1012
11. Dick AC, Coulter P, Hainsworth AM et al. (1998) A comparative study of analgesia requirements following laparoscopic and open fundoplication in children. Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 8: 425-429
12. Downs SH, Black NA, Devlin HB et al. (1996) Systematic review of the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomie. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 78: 241-323
13. Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D (1998) Laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy: a metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg 186: 545-553
14. Hasukic S, Mesic D, Dizdarevic E et al. (2002) Pulmonary function after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 16: 163-165
15. Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Koivukangas P et al. (1999) Comparison of costs between laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication: a prospective randomized study with a 3-month follow up. J Am Coll Surg 188: 368-376
16. Hendolin HI, Paakonen ME, Alhava EM et al. (2000) Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial to compare postoperative pain, pulmonary function, and stress response. Eur J Surg 166: 394-399
17. Junghans T, RaueW, HaaseOetal. (2006). Value of laparoscopic surgery in elective colorectal surgery with "fast-track"-rehabilitation. Zentralbl Chir 131: 298-303
18. Keus F, Jong JA de, Gooszen HG, Laarhoven CJ van (2006) Laparoscopic vs. open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18: CD006231
19. Korolija D, Sauerland S, Wood-Dauphinee S et al. (2004) Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 18: 879-897
20. Kristiansson M, Saraste L, Soop M et al. (1999) Diminished interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein responses to laparoscopic vs. open cholecystectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 43: 146-152
21. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Castells A, Pique JM (1995) Short outcome analysis of randomized study comparing laparoscopic vs. open colectomy for cancer. Surg Endosc 9: 1101-1105
22. Law WL, Lee YM, Choi HK et al. (2006) Laparoscopic and open anterior resection for upper and mid rectal cancer: an evaluation of outcomes. Dis Colon Rec 49: 1108-1115
23. Lundorff P, Hahlin M, Kallfelt Betal. (1991) Adhesion formation after laparoscopic surgery in tubal pregnancy: a randomized trial vs. laparotomy. Fertil Steril 55: 911-915
24. McCoemack K, Scott NW, Go PM et al. (2003) Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1: CD001785
25. McGinn FP, Miles AJG, Uglow M, Ozmen M (1995) Randomized trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and mini-cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 82: 1374-1377
26. Milingos S, Kallipolitis G, Loutradis D et al. (2000) Adhesions: laparoscopic surgery vs. laparotomy. Ann N Y Acad Sci 900: 272-285
27. Murray A, LourencoT, Verteuil R de et al. (2006) Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 10: 1-160
28. Olsen MF, Josefson K, Dalenback J et al. (1997) Respiratory function after laparoscopic and open fundoplication Eur J Surg 163: 667-672
29. Perttila J, Salo M, Ovaska J et al. (1999) Immune response after laparoscopic and conventional Nissen fundoplication. Eur J Surg 165: 21-28
30. Polymeneas G, Theodosopoulos T, Stamatiadis A, Kourias E. (2001) A comparative study of postoperative adhesion formation after laparoscopic vs. open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 15: 41-43
31. Rattner DW, Brooks DC (1995) Patient satisfaction following laparoscopic and open antireflux surgery. Arch Surg 130: 289-293
32. Reza MM, Blasco JA, Andradas E et al. (2006) Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 93: 921-928
33. Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Müller J (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 20: CD003145
34. Stage JG, Schulze S, Müller P et al. (1997) Prospective randomized study of laparoscopic versus open colonic resection for adenocarcinoma. Br J Surgery 83: 391-396
35. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005). Laparoscopic surgery vs. open surgery for colorectal cancer: short term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6: 477-484
36. Wichmann MW, Huttl TR Winter H et al. (2005) Immunolog ical effects of laparoscopic vs open colorectal surgery: a prospective clinical study. Arch Surg 140: 692-697
37. Yoshida S, Ohta J, Yamasaki K et al. (2000) Effect of surgical stress on endogenous morphine and cytokine levels in the plasma after laparoscopoic or open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 14: 137-140
38. ZhengZheng MH, Feng B, Lu AG et al. (2005) Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy with curative intent for colon carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 11: 323-326
39. Zieren J, Jacobi CA, Wenger FA et al. (2000) Fundoplication: a model for immunologic aspects of laparoscopic and conventional surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 10: 35-40