Ways of being personal and not being personal about religious beliefs in the clinical setting

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 7, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 16-18

  Cohen, Cynthia B ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFLICT; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ETHICS; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; PATIENT CARE; RELIGION; REVIEW;

CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; RELIGION AND MEDICINE; SPIRITUALITY;

EID: 34547370544     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160701399578     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. Brody, H. 1992. The healer's power. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2. Cohen, C. B., et al. 2001. Walking a fine line: Physician inquiries into patients' religious and spiritual beliefs. Hastings Center Report 31:29-29.
3. Emanuel, E. J., and L. L. Emanuel. 1992. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. Journal of the American Medical Association 267: 2221-2226.
4. Kuczewski, M. 1996. Reconceiving the family. The process of consent in medical decision making. Hastings Center Report 26(2): 30-37.
5. Kuczewski, M. G. 2007. Talking about spirituality in the clinical setting: Can being professional require being personal? American Journal of Bioethics 7(7): 4-11.
6. Lo, B., L. W. Kates, D. Ruston, et al. 2002. Discussing religious and spiritual issues at the end of life: A practical guide for physicians. Journal of the American Medical Association 287(6): 749-754.
7. Puchalski, C. M., and A. L. Romer. 2000. Taking a spiritual history allows clinicians to understand patients more fully. Journal of Palliative Medicine 3: 129-137.