Low awareness of the link between science and innovation affects public policies in developing countries: The Chilean case

Scientometrics

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 93-103

  Krauskopf, Manuel ^a,b   Krauskopf, Erwin ^a,b,c   Méndez, Bernardita ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD ANDRÉS BELLO   (Chile)

^b Millenium Institute for Fundamental and Applied Biology ^*  (Chile)

^c Fundacion Ciencia para la Vida   (Chile)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547365842     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1737-5     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. ATALLAH, G., RODRIGUEZ, G. (2006), Indirect patent citations, Scientometrics, 67:437-465.
2. BENAVENTE, J. M. (2005), Innovación Tecnológica en Chile: Dónde estamos y qué se puede hacer, Economia Chilena, 8:53-74.
3. BRAINARD, J. (2005), The Ghosts of Stanford. Have federal constraints on reimbursing overhead for research grants gone too far? Chronicle of Higher Education 51:A16.
4. CARPENTER, M. P., COOPER, M., NARIN, F. (1980), Linkage between basic research and patents, Research Management, 23:30-35.
5. CHEN, Y., PUTTITANUN, T. (2005), Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries, Journal of Development Economics, 79:474-493.
6. EYZAGUIRRE, B., FOULON, C. L, HINZPETER, X. (2000), Los Chilenos no entendemos lo quo leemos. Puntos de Referencía. Centra de Estudios Públicos, Santiago, Chile, July 2000.
7. GUPTA, V. K. (2006), References to literature in patent documents: A case study of CSIR in India, Scientometrics, 68:29-40.
8. IVERSEN, E. J. (2000), An excursion into the patent-bibliomeirics of Norwegian patenting, Scientometrics, 49:63-80.
9. KRAUSKOPF, M. (2003), Indicadores cuantiiativos de los doctorados conferidos en el país ¿Falta de atención o expression de subdesarrollo? In: Calidad en la Educación, Estudios de Postgrado. Perspectivas y denafios. CSE, Santiago, pp. 47-59.
10. MENDEZ, B. (2005), La Moda de las Patentes, Bioplanet, 34:18-21.
11. MFYER, M. (2000), What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and patent citations. Scientometrics, 49:93-123.
12. MEYER, M. (2006a), Measuring science-technology interaction in the knowledge-driven economy: The case of a small economy, Scientometrics, 66:425-439.
13. MEYER, M. (2006b), Knowledge integrators or weak links? An exploratory comparison of patenting researchers with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology, Scientometrics, 69:545-560.
14. MEYER, M., PEREIRA, T. S., PERSSON, O., GRANSTRAND, O. (2004), The scientometric world of Keith Pavitt. A tribute to his contributions to research policy and patent analysis. Research Policy, 33:1405-1417.
15. NARIN, F., HAMILTON, K. S., OLIVASTRO, D. (1997), The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science, Research Policy, 26:317-330.
16. NARIN, F., NOMA, E. (1985), Is technology becoming science? Scientometrics, 1:369-381.
17. TOKMAN, M., ZAHLER, A. (2004), Innovación para un crecimiento sostenido: Siete lecciones para Chile, En Foco, 17 : Expansiva, Santiago.
18. TUSSEN, R. J. W., BUTER, R. K., VAN LEEUWEN, TH. N. (2000), Technological relevance of science: An assessment of citation linkages between patents and research papers, Scientometrics, 47:389-412.