Constructing Copernicus

Perspectives on Science

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 208-227

  Barker, Peter ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^b Danish Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547341933     PISSN: 10636145     EISSN: 15309274     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/106361402321147531     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Aiton, E. J. 1987. "Peurbach's Theoricae novae planetarum: a translation with commentary." Osiris, 2nd series, 3, pp. 5-44.
2. Ariew, Roger. 1992. "Theory of comets at Paris during the 17th century." Journal of the History of Ideas, 53: 355-372.
3. Ariew, Roger. 1999. Descartes and the Last Scholastics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
4. Baldasso, Renzo. 1998. Galileo's Celestial Dynamics. M.A. thesis, University of Oklahoma.
5. Barker, Peter. 1985. "Jean Pena (1528-58) and Stoic Physics in the Sixteenth Century." In Recovering the Stoics: Spindel Conference 1984. Edited by R.H. Epp. Southern Journal of Philosophy (Supplement), 13: 93-107.
6. Barker, Peter. 1991. "Stoic contributions to early modern science." Pp. 135-54 in Atoms, pneuma and tranquillity: Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought. Edited by M. J. Osler. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Barker, Peter. 1990. "Copernicus, the Orbs and the Equant." In Pierre Duhem: Historian and Philosopher of Science. Edited by R. Ariew and P. Barker. Synthese, 83:317-323.
8. Barker, Peter. 1993. "The Optical Theory of Comets from Apian to Kepler." Physis, 30: 1-25.
9. Barker, Peter. 1997. "Kepler's Epistemology." Pp. 355-68 in Method and Order in Renaissance Natural Philosophy. Edited by C. Methuen, D. Di Liscia, and E. Kesslerpp. New York: Kluwer.
10. Barker, Peter. 1999. "Copernicus and the Critics of Ptolemy." Journal for the History of Astronomy, 30: 343-358.
11. Barker, Peter. 2000. "The Role of Religion in the Lutheran Response to Copernicus." Pp. 59-88 in Rethinking the Scientific Revolution. Edited by M. J. Osler. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Barker, Peter. 2001a. "Incommensurability and Conceptual Change during the Copernican Revolution." Pp. 241-73 in Incommensurability and Related Matters. Edited by H. Sankey and P. Hoyningen-Huene. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Boston: Kluwer.
13. Barker, Peter. 2001b. "Brahe and Rothmann on Atmospheric Refraction." Pp. 43-50 in Optics and Astronomy. Edited by G. Simon & S. Débarbat. Proceedings of the XXth International Congress of History of Science, Liège 1997, vol XII. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols.
14. Barker, Peter. Forthcoming. "Stoic Alternatives to Aristotelian Cosmology: Pena and Rothmann." Revue d'Histoire des Sciences.
15. Barker, Peter and Goldstein, Bernard R. 1984. "Is seventeenth century physics indebted to the Stoics?" Centaurus, 27: 148-164.
16. Barker, Peter and Goldstein, Bernard R. 1988. "The Role of Comets in the Copernican Revolution." Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 19: 299-319.
17. Barker, Peter and Goldstein, Bernard R. 1994. "Distance and Velocity in Kepler's Astronomy." Annals of Science, 51: 59-73.
18. Barker, Peter and Goldstein, Bernard R. 1998. "Realism and Instrumentalism in Sixteenth Century Astronomy: A Reappraisal" Perspectives on Science, 6: 232-258.
19. Barker, Peter and Goldstein, Bernard R. 2001. "Theological Foundations of Kepler's Astronomy." In Science in Theisitic Contexts: Cognitive Dimensions. Edited by John Hedley
20. Brooke, Margaret J. Osler, and Jitse van der Meer. Osiris, 16: 88-113.
21. di Bono, M. 1995. "Copernicus, Amico, Fracastoro and Tusi's device: observations on the use and transmission of a model." Journal for the History of Astronomy, 26: 133-54.
22. Brahe, Tycho. 1588. De mundi aetherii recentioribus phaenomenis. Uraniborg: Imprimebat Authoris, typographus Christophorus Weida. Copernicus, Nicholas. 1543. De revolutionibus orbium coeoelestium libri VI. Nuremberg: Ioannes Petreius.
23. Crowe, Michael J. 1990. Theories of the World from Antiquity to the Copernican Revolution. New York: Dover.
24. Dear, Peter. 1995. Discipline & Experience: the Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Densmore, Dana. 1995. Newton's Principia: the central argument. Santa Fe: Green Lion Press.
26. Evans, James.1998. The History and Practice of Ancient Astronomy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Galilei, Galileo. (1610)1989. Sidereus Nuncius, or The Sidereal Messenger. Translated by Albert Van Helden. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Galilei, Galileo. 1632. Dialogo... sopra i due massimi sistemi del mondo tolemaico, e copernicano; proponendo indeterminatamente le ragioni filosofiche, e naturali tanto per l'vna, quanto per l'altra parte. Florence: B. Landini.
29. Garber, Daniel. 1992. Descartes' metaphysical physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Garber, Daniel. 2001. Descartes embodied: reading Cartesian philosophy through Cartesian science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Gingerich, Owen. 1973. "The Role of Erasmus Reinhold and the Prutenic Tables in the Dissemination of Copernican Theory." Pp. 48-50 in Studia Copernicana 6: Études sur l'audience de la théorie héliocentrique. Edited by J. Dobrzycki. Wroclaw:
32. Goldstein, Bernard R. 1967. "The Arabic Version of Ptolemy's Planetary Hypotheses." Transactions of the American Philosophical Society. 57, Pt. 4.
33. Goldstein, Bernard R. 1985. Theory and observation in ancient and medieval astronomy. London: Variorum.
34. Goldstein, Bernard R. 1991. "The Blasphemy of Alfonso X: History or Myth?" Pp. 143-53 in Revolution and Continuity: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Early Modern Science. Edited by Peter Barker and Roger Ariew. Washington: Catholic University of America Press.
35. Goldstein, Bernard R. and Barker, P. 1995. "The Role of Rothmann in the Dissolution of the Celestial Spheres." British Journal for the History of Science, 28: 385-403.
36. Hanson, Norwood Russell. 1958. Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Hashimoto, Keizo. 1987. "Longomontanus's Astronomia Danica in China." Journal for the History of Astronomy, 18: 95-110.
38. Jervis, Jane L. 1985. Cometary theory in fifteenth-century Europe. Boston: D. Reidel.
39. Keckermann, B. 1611. Systema Systematum. Edited by J. Alsted. Hannover: Antonius.
40. Kepler, Johannes. 1596. Mysterium Cosmographicum. Tübingen: J. Gruppenbachius.
41. Kepler, Johannes. (1609)1992. A New Astronomy from the Causes. Translated by William H. Donahue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Kepler, Johannes. (1621)1953. Epitome astronomiae Copernicanae, liber quintus. Gesammelte Werke, Vol. 7. Edited by M. Caspar. Munich: C. H. Beck.
43. Kepler, Johannes. (1621)1981. Mysterium Cosmographicum. 2nd. ed. Translated by A. M. Duncan. New York: Abaris.
44. Kuhn, Thomas S. 1957. The Copernican Revolution: Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
45. Kusukawa, Sachiko. 1995. The Transformation of Natural Philosophy: The Case of Philip Melanchthon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Lattis, James. 1994. Between Copernicus and Galileo: Christopher Clavius and the Collapse of Ptolemaic Astronomy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47. Longomontanus, Christian S. 1622. Astronomia Danica, vigiliis et opera Christiani S. Longomontani... posterior theorias de motibus planetarum ad observationes D. Tychonis Brahae, et proprias, in triplici forma redintegratas itidem duobus libris complectitur. Amsterodam: Caesius.
48. Maestlin, Michael. 1578. Observatio & demonstratio cometae aetherei qui anno 1577. et 1578. constitvtvs in sphaera veneris, apparvit. Tübingen: G. Gruppenbachius.
49. Magini, Giovanni Antonio. 1589. Novae coelestivm orbivm theoricae congruentes cum obseruationibus N. Copernici. Venice: D. Zenarij.
50. Martens, Rhonda. 2000. Kepler's Philosophy and the New Astronomy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
51. Melanchthon, Philipp. 1549. Initia Doctrina Physicae. Wittenberg: Lufft. Reprinted in Corpus Reformatorum, Vol 13. (1846) Edited by C. G. Bretschneider. Halis Saxonum: Schwetschke and Filius.
52. Methuen, Charlotte. 1996. "Maestlin's Teaching of Copernicus: the Evidence of His University Textbook and Disputations," Isis, 87: 230-47.
53. Methuen, Charlotte. 1998. Kepler's Tübingen: Stimulus to a Theological Mathematics. Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate.
54. Newton, Isaac. (1729)1934. Sir Isaac Newton's Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and his System of the World. Translated by Andrew Motte. Edited by Florian Cajori. Berkeley: University of California Press.
55. Pedersen, O. 1993. Early Physics and Astronomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Peucer, Caspar. 1551. Elementa doctrinae de circulis coelestibus, et primo motu, recognita et correcta. Wittenberg: Crato.
57. Regiomontanus. 1496. Epytoma Joannis de Monte Regio in Almagestum Ptolemei. Venice: J. Hamman de Landoia.
58. Reinhold, Erasmus. 1542. Theoricae novae planetarum Georgii Purbachii Germani ab Erasmo Reinholdo Salveldensi pluribus figuris auctae. Wittenberg: Ioannes Lufft.
59. Reinhold, Erasmus. 1549. Ptolemaei mathematicae constructionis liber primus graece & latine editus. Additae explicationes aliquot locorum, ab E. Rheinholt. Wittenberg: I. Lufft.
60. Reinhold, Erasmus. 1551. Prutenicae tabulae coelestium motuum. Tübingen: Ulricus Morhardus.
61. Reinhold, Erasmus. 1553. Theoricae novae planetarum Georgii Purbachii Germani ab Erasmo Reinholdo Salveldensi... Recens editae et auctae novis scholiis in Theorica Solis ab ipso autore. Wittenberg: G. Lufft.
62. Rheticus, Georg Joachim. 1540. De libris revolutionum eruditissimi viri, & Mathematici excellentissimi, Reverendi D. Doctoris Nicolai Copernici Torunnaei, Canonici Varmiensis, per quendam Juvenem, Mathematicae studiosum Narratio prima. Gedani: Rhodus, 1540.
63. Schofield, Christine Jones. 1981. Tychonic and Semi-Tychonic World Systems. New York: Abaris.
64. Shackelford, Jole. 1991. "Paracelsianism and Patronage in Early Modern Denmark." Pp. 85-109 in Patronage and Institutions: Science, technology, and medicine at the European court, 1500-1750. Edited by Bruce T. Moran. Rochester, N.Y.: Boydell Press.
65. Reinhold, Erasmus. 1993. "Tycho Brahe, Laboratory Design, and the Aim of Science: Reading Plans in Context." Isis, 84: 211-230.
66. Stevenson, B.1994. Kepler's Physical Astronomy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
67. Sumner, Katherine Tredwell 1999. Reinhold's Response to Copernicus: Copernican Solar Theory in Erasmus Reinhold's Commentary on Peurbach's Theoricae Novae Planetarum. M.A. Thesis, University of Oklahoma.
68. Swerdlow, Noel M. 1976. "Pseudodoxia Copernicana." Archives Internationales d'Histoire des Sciences. 26: 105-58.
69. Swerdlow. Noel M. and Otto Neugebauer. 1984. Mathematical Astronomy in Copernicus's De Revolutionibus. 2 vols. Berlin: Springer.
70. Voelkel, James R. 2001. The Composition of Kepler's Astronomia Nova. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
71. Westman, Robert S. 1974. "The Melanchthon Circle, Rheticus and the Wittenberg Interpretation of the Copernican Theory." Isis, 85: 79-115.
72. Westman, Robert S. 1994. "Two Cultures or One? A Second Look at Kuhn's The Copernican Revolution." Isis, 85: 79-115.
73. Wilson, Curtis. 1989. "The Newtonian Achievement in Astronomy." Pp. 233-274 in The General History of Astronomy: Planetary astronomy from the Renaissance to the rise of astrophysics, vol. 2A: Tycho Brahe to Newton. Edited by R. Taton and C.Wilson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74. Wolfson, Harry A. 1962. "The Problem of the Souls of the Spheres from the Byzantine Commentaries of Aristotle through the Arabs and St. Thomas to Kepler." The Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 16: 67-93.