“Fascistoid” heroism revisited: A deontological twist to a recent debate

Journal of the Philosophy of Sport

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 96-104

  Holowchak, M Andrew ^a  

^a KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547339873     PISSN: 00948705     EISSN: 15432939     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00948705.2005.9714673     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Fairchild, D. L., 1989. Sport Abjection:Steroids and the Uglification of the Athlete. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, XVI:74–88.
2. Holowchak, M. Andrew. 2000. ‘Aretism’ and Pharmacological Ergogenic Aids in Sport:Taking a Shot at Steroids. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, XXVII (1):35–50.
3. Holowchak, M. Andrew. 2001. Aretism:Excellence as Athletic Ideal. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 15 (1):153–164.
4. Hyland, Drew. 1990. Philosophy of Sport, New York:Paragon House.
5. Kant, Immanuel. 1993. Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Indianapolis:Hackett.
6. Schneider, Angela, and Butcher, R. B., 1993-94. Why Olympic Athletes Should Avoid the Use and Seek the Elimination of Performance-Enhancing Substances and Practices From the Olympic Games. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, XX-XXI:64–81.
7. Simon, Robert. 2004. Fair Play:The Ethics of Sport, 2nd ed., Boulder, CO:Westview Press.
8. Tamburrini, Claudio. 1998. Sports, Fascism, and the Market. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, XXV:35–47.
9. Tännsjö, Torbjörn. 1998. Is Our Admiration for Sports Heroes Fascistoid?. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, XXV:23–34.