Feminism and the public-private distinction

The Public and the Private: Issues of Democratic Citizenship

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 205-228

  Uberoi, Patricia ^a  

^a JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547336964     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9788132103738.n9     Document Type: Chapter

References (57)

1. Agarwal, Bina. 1999. ’The Family’ in Public Policy: Fallacious Assumptions and Gender Implications. New Delhi: National Council for Applied Economic Research.
2. Agarwal, Bina. 1997. ’"Bargaining" and Gender: Relations Within and Beyond the Household’, Feminist Economics, 3, 1: 1-51. doi:10.1080/135457097338799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/135457097338799
3. Agarwal, Bina. 1994. A Field of One’s Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Beauvoir, Simone de. 1953. The Second Sex. London: Jonathan Cape.
5. Béteille, André. 1993. ’The Family and the Reproduction of Inequality,’ in PatriciaUberoi (ed.), Family, Kinship and Marriage in India, pp. 435-51. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
6. Bulbeck, Chilla. 1998. Re-orienting Western Feminisms: Women’s Diversity in a Postcolonial World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Code, Lorraine (ed.). 2000. Encyclopaedia of Feminist Theory. London and New York: Routledge.
8. Chatterjee, Partha. 1993. The Nation and its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9. Chaudhuri, Maitrayee. 1995. ’Citizens, Workers and Emblems of Culture: An Analysis of the First Plan Document on Women’, Contributions to Indian Sociology, vol. 29, nos 1 and 2, pp. 211-35. doi:10.1177/0069966795029001011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0069966795029001011
10. Das, Veena. 1993 [1976]. ’Masks and Faces: An Essay on Punjabi Kinship,’ in PatriciaUberoi (ed.), Family, Kinship and Marriage in India, pp. 198-222. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
11. Delphy, C.1984. Close to Home: A Materialist Analysis of Women’s Oppression. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
12. Dube, Leela. 1997. Women and Kinship: Comparative Perspectives on Gender in South and South-East Asia. Tokyo: United Nations University Press/New Delhi: Vistaar.
13. Gandhi, Nandita and NanditaShah. 1992. The Issues at Stake: Theory and Practice in the Contemporary Women’s Movement. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
14. Government of India (GOI). 1988. Shram Shakti: Report of the National Commission on Self-employed Women and Women in the Informal Sector. New Delhi: Government of India Press.
15. Government of India (GOI). 1974. Towards Equality: Report of the Committee on the Status of Women in India. New Delhi: Department of Social Welfare. Government of India Press.
16. Hasan, Zoya. 1999. ’Gender Politics, Legal Reform and the Muslim Community in India,’ in PatriciaJeffery and AmritaBasu (eds), Resisting the Sacred and the Secular: Women’s Activism and Politicised Religion in South Asia, pp. 71-88. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
17. Hasan, Zoya. (ed.). 1994. Forging Identities: Gender, Communities and the State. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
18. John, Mary. 2001. ’The Encounter of Sociology and Women’s Studies: Questions from the Borders,’ Contributions to Indian Sociology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 237-58. doi:10.1177/006996670103500204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/006996670103500204
19. John, Mary. 1996. Discrepant Locations: Feminism, Theory and Postcolonial Histories. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
20. Kapur, Ratna and BrendaCossman. 1996. Subversive Sites: Feminist Engagements with the Law in India. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
21. Karlekar, Malavika. 1999. ’Breaking the Silence and Choosing to Hear: Perceptions of Violence,’ in Fanny M.Cheung, et al. (eds), Breaking the Silence: Violence Against Women in Asia, pp. 59-81. Hong Kong: UNESCO and Equal Opportunities Commission.
22. Kishwar, Madhu. 1999. ’A Horror of "isms": Why I Do Not Call Myself a Feminist,’ in Off the Beaten Track: Rethinking Gender Justice for Indian Women, pp. 268-90. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
23. Kumar, Radha. 1993. The History of Doing: An Illustrated Account of Movements for Women’s Rights and Feminism in India, 1800-1990. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
24. Menefee-Singh, Andrea and AnitaKelles-Viitanen (eds). 1987. Invisible Hands: Women in Home Based Production. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
25. Menon, Nivedita. 1995. ’The Impossibility of "Justice": Female Foeticide and Feminist Discourse on Abortion,’ Contributions to Indian Sociology, vol. 29, nos 1 and 2: 372-92. doi:10.1177/0069966795029001017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0069966795029001017
26. Mukherjee, Mukul. 1999. ’Women and Work in India: A Collage from Five Decades of Independence,’ in BharatiRay and AparnaBasu (eds), From Independence Towards Freedom: Indian Women Since 1947, pp. 56-79. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
27. Mies, Maria. 1982. The Lace-Makers of Narsapur: Indian Housewives Produce for a World Market. London: Zed Books.
28. Moore, Henrietta. 1988. Feminism and Anthropology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
29. Nicholson, Linda J.1992. ’Feminist Theory: The Public and the Private,’ in LindaMcDowell and RosemaryPringle (eds), Defining Women: Social Institutions and Gender Divisions, pp. 36-43. Cambridge: Polity Press.
30. Nussbaum, Martha C.2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. New Delhi: Kali for Women. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511841286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841286
31. Oakley, Ann. 1976. Housewife. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
32. Okin, Susan Moller. 1998. ’Gender, the Public and the Private,’ in A.Phillips (ed.), Feminism and Politics, pp. 116-41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Palriwala, Rajni. 1994. Changing Kinship, Family and Gender Relations in South Asia: Processes, Trends and Issues. Leiden: Women and Autonomy Centre.
34. Papanek, Hannah. 1990. ’To Each Less Than She Needs, for Each More Than She Can Do: Allocations, Entitlements and Value,’ in IreneTinker (ed.), Persistent Inequalities, pp. 162-81. New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Papanek, Hannah. 1989. ’Family Status-Production Work: Women’s Contribution to Social Mobility and Class Differentiation,’ in MaitreyiKrishnaraj and KarunaChanana (eds.), Gender and the Household Domain: Social and Cultural Dimensions, pp. 97-116. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
36. Parashar, Archana. 1992. Women and Family Law Reform in India: Uniform Civil Code and Gender Equality. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
37. Pateman, Carole. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Cambridge: Polity Press.
38. Pateman, Carole. 1987. ’Feminist Critiques of the Public/Private Distinction,’ in A.Phillips (ed.), Feminism and Equality, pp. 103-26. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
39. Rao, Arati. 1996. ’Right in the Home. Feminist Theoretical Perspectives on International Human Rights,’ in RatnaKapur (ed.), Feminist Terrains in Legal Domains: Interdisciplinary Essays on Women and Law in India, pp. 100-21. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
40. Rege, Sharmila. 2000. ’Histories from the Borderlands,’ Seminar, no. 495, Situating Sociology, November, pp. 55-61.
41. Sangari, Kumkum. 2000. ’Gender lines: Personal Laws, Uniform laws, Conversions,’ in ImtiazAhmed, Partha S.Ghosh, and HelmutReifeld (eds), Pluralism and Equality: Values in Indian Society and Politics, pp. 271-319. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
42. Sangari, Kumkum. 1995. ’Politics of Diversity: Religious Communities and Multiple Patriarchies,’ Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 30, no. 51, pp. 3287-3310.
43. Sangari, Kumkum. 1993. ’The Amenities of Domestic Life: Questions on Labour,’ Social Scientist, vol. 21, nos 9-11, pp. 3-46. doi:10.2307/3520425 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3520425
44. Sen, Amartya. 1993 [1983]. ’Economics and the Family,’ in PatriciaUberoi, (ed), Family, Kinship and Marriage in India, pp. 452-63. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
45. Sen, Amartya. 1990. ’Gender and Cooperative Conflicts,’ in IreneTinker (ed.), Persistent Inequalities: Women and World Development, pp. 123-49. New York: Oxford University Press.
46. Som, Reba. 1992. ’Jawaharlal Nehru and the Hindu Code: A Victory of Symbol Over Substance?’ Occasional Paper No. 30. New Delhi: Nehru Memorial Museum and Library.
47. Spender, Dale. 1985. For the Record: The Making and Meaning of Feminist Knowledge. London: The Women’s Press.
48. Tuttle, Lisa. 1987. Encyclopedia of Feminism. London: Arrow Books.
49. Uberoi, Patricia. 2001. ’Imagining the Family: An Ethnography of Viewing Hum aapke hain koun…!’, in RachelDwyer and ChristopherPinney (eds.), Pleasure and the Nation: The History, Politics and Consumption of Popular Culture in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
50. Uberoi, Patricia. 2000. ’The Family in India: Beyond the Nuclear versus Joint Debate.’ Institute of Economic Growth, Occasional Papers in Sociology No. 2.
51. Uberoi, Patricia. 1996. ’When is a Marriage not a Marriage? Sex, Sacrament and Contract in Hindu Marriage,’ in PatriciaUberoi (ed.), Social Reform, Sexuality and the State, pp. 319-45. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
52. Uberoi, Patricia. 1995. ’Problems with Patriarchy: Conceptual Issues in the Engagement of Anthropology and Feminism,’ Sociological Bulletin, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 195-221.
53. Uberoi, Patricia. 1993a. ’Reciprocity in Social Science: Gender Issues,’ The Indian Journal of Social Science,’ vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 243-58.
54. Uberoi, Patricia. 1993b. Family, Kinship and Marriage in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
55. Uberoi, Patricia. 1984. ’Suicide, Incest and Cannibalism: An Anthropological Exegesis of a Modern Chinese Short Story,’ Social Analysis, vol. 16; pp. 60-78.
56. Weitzman, Lenore. 1981. The Marriage Contract: Spouses, Lovers, and the Law. New York: The Free Press.
57. Williams, Raymond. 1976. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Fontana-Collins.