Unacceptability of instantaneous errors in mobile television: From annoying audio to video

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 159, Issue , 2006, Pages 1-8

  Jumisko Pyykkö, Satu ^a   Vinod Kumar, M V ^a   Korhonen, Jari ^b  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^b NOKIA RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Audio; Audiovisual quality; Perception; Transmission errors; Video

Indexed keywords

CARRIER COMMUNICATION; DIGITAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; IMAGE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; MOBILE DEVICES;

DATA STREAMS; DIGITAL VIDEO BROADCASTING; PROGRAM CONTENTS; TRANSMISSION ERRORS;

ERROR ANALYSIS;

EID: 34547319570     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1152215.1152217     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Casey, B., Casey, N., Calvert, B., French, L., Justin, L. Television Studies - The Key Concepts. p.291. Routledge. London, 2002.
2. Coolican, H., 2004. Research methods and statistics in psychology. Fourth edition London: J. W. Arrowsmith Ltd, 2004. p 711.
3. ETSI,"Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB): DVB specification for data broadcasting," ETSI standard, EN 301 192j V1.4.1, 2004.
4. ETSI, "Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB): Transmission systems for handheld terminals," ETSI standard, EN 302 304 V1.1.1, 2004.
5. ETSI, "Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); Specification for the use of video and audio coding in DVB services delivered directly over IP," ETSI standard, ETSI TS 102 005 V1.2.0, 2005.
6. Beerends, J.G. & de Caluwe, F.E. The influence of video quality on perceived audio quality and vice versa. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 47 (5), 355-362, 1999.
7. Brebner, J. T. and A. T. Welford. 1980. Introduction: an historical background sketch. In A. T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction Times. Academic Press, New York, pp. 1-23.
8. Ghinea, G. & Thomas, J. P. "QoS impact user perception and understanding of multimedia video clips. Proceedings of ACM Multimedia '98". Bristol: 1998. pp. 49-54.
9. Gilbert, E., N. Capacity of a burst-noise channel. Bell Systems Technical Journal, 39:1253-1265, September 1960..
10. Hands, D. S. A Basic Multimedia Quality Model. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, Vol. 6, No. 6, December (2004). pp. 806-816.
11. Hands S. D. and Avons S. E. Recency and duration neglect in subjective assessment of television picture quality. Applied cognitive psychology No. 15 (2001). p. 639-657.
12. ISO/IEC 14496-10:2003, "Coding of Audiovisual Objects -Part 10: Advanced Video Coding," 2003, also ITU-T Recommendation H.264 "Advanced video coding for generic audiovisual services."
13. ISO/IEC 14496-3: "Information technology - Coding of audio-visual objects - Part 3: Audio, including amendment 1: "Bandwidth Extension" and amendment 2: "Parametric Coding for High Quality Audio".
14. ITU-R BT.500-11 Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures, International Telecommunications Union - Radiocommunication sector, 2002.
15. P.920 Interactive test methods for audiovisual communications, International Telecommunications Union -Telecommunication standardization sector, 2000. p. 11.
16. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics 14: (1973) p.201-211
17. Jumisko-Pyykkö, S. and Häkkinen, J.. "Evaluation of Subjective Video Quality on Mobile Devices". Proceedings of ACM Multimedia 2005, Singapore 6.-12. November 2005. pp.535-538
18. Jumisko-Pyykkö, S., Vinod Kumar M. V., Liinasuo, M, Hannuksela, M. Acceptance of Audiovisual Quality in Erroneous Television Sequences over a DVB-H Channel. Proceedings of Second International Workshop in Video Processing and Quality Metrics for Consumer Electronics, Scottsdale, USA, January 2006
19. Köpke, A., Willig, A., and Holger, K. Chaotic Maps as Parsimonious Bit Error Models of Wireless Channels. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM (San Francisco, California, USA, April 1-3, 2003), 513-523.
20. McCarthy, J. D., Sasse M. A. and Miras D. "Sharp or Smooth?: Comparing the Effect of Quantization vs. Framerate for Streamed Video", 2004, Proc. of the 2004 conference on Human factors in computing systems.Vienna: 2004. p. 535-542.
21. McGurk, H. and MacDonald, J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748, 1976.
22. Pastrana-Vidal, R.. Gicquel, J.C Colomes, C. and Cherifi, H. "Sporadic Frame Dropping Impact on Quality Perception," Human Vision and Electronic Imaging IX, SPIE, vol. 5292, San José CA, January 2004.
23. Pastrana, R., Gicquel, J., Colomes, C., Hocine. C. "Sporadic Signal Loss Impact on Auditory Quality Perception". http://wireless.feld.cvut.cz/ mesaqin2004/contributions.html, 2004.
24. Poikonen, J., and Paavola, J. Comparison of Finite-State Models for Simulating the DVB-H Link Layer Performance. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS '05) (Siena, Italy, September 5-7, 2005), 153-157.
25. Reeves, B. & Nass, C.. The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press. 1996
26. Rogers E. M. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed., New York: Free Press, 2003. p. 560.
27. Södergård C. (ed.). Mobile television - technology and user experiences, Report on the Mobile -TV Project. Espoo: VTT Publications 506, 2003. p.298.
28. Van Wassenhove V., Grant K.W., Poeppel D. Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(4),1181-6, 2005.
29. Watson, A., Sasse, M. A. Measuring Perceived Quality of Speech and Video in Multimedia Conferencing Applications. Proc. ACM multimedia 1998. Bristol, UK: 1998. pp. 55-60
30. Watson, A. Sasse, M.A., "Multimedia conferencing via multicast: Determining the Quality of Service required by the end-user". Proc. International Workshop on Audio-Visual Services over Packet Networks (AVSPN) 15-16 September 1997, Aberdeen.
31. Willig, A., Kubisch, M., Hoene, C., and Wolisz, A. Measurements of a Wireless Link in an Industrial Environment using an IEEE 802.11-Compliant Physical Layer. IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, 49, 6 (Dec. 2002), 1265-1282.
32. Winkler, S. & Faller, C. Audiovisual quality evaluation of low-bitrate video. Proc. SPIE/IS&T Human Vision and Electronic Imaging, vol. 5666. San Jose, United States of America: January 2005. pp. 139-148