Masculinity and femininity scales: Current state of the art;Escalas de masculinidad y feminidad: Estado actual de la cuestión

Psicothema

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 357-365

  Fernández, Juan ^a   Quiroga, María Angeles ^a   Del Olmo, Isabel ^a   Rodríguez, Antonio ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b Consejería de Educación de la Comunidad de Madrid ^*  (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REVIEW; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMANS; MALE; SEX FACTORS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 34547308610     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Abramson, P.R. (1990). Sexual science: Emerging discipline or oxymoron? The Journal of Sex Research, 17, 147-165.
2. Auster, C.J., y Ohm, S.C. (2000). Masculinity and femininity in contemporary American society: A reevaluation using the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Sex Roles, 43, 499-528.
3. Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago, CA: Rand McNally.
4. Baucom, D.H. (1976). Independent masculinity and femininity scales on the California Psychological Inventory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 876.
5. Beere, C.A. (1990). Gender roles. A handbook of tests and measures. New York: Greenwood Press.
6. Bem, S. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.
7. Berzins, J.I., Welling, M.A., y Wetter, R.E. (1978). A new measurement of psychological androgyny based on the Personality Research Form. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 126-138.
8. Constantinople, A. (1973). Masculinity-femininity: An exception to the famous dictum? Psychological Bulletin, 80, 389-407.
9. Cook, E.P. (1985). Psychological androgyny. New York: Pergamon Press.
10. Cook, E.P. (1987). Psychological androgyny: A review of the research. The Counseling Psychologist, 15, 471-513.
11. Fernández, J. (1983). Nuevas perspectivas en la medida de la masculinidad y feminidad. Madrid: Editorial de la Universidad Complutense.
12. Fernández, J. (1996). ¿Son incompatibles la sexología y la generología? Anuario de Sexología, 2, 33-42.
13. Fernández, J. (coord.).(2000a). La intervención en los ámbitos de la sexología y la generología. Madrid: Pirámide.
14. Fernández, J. (2000b). ¿Es posible hablar científicamente de género sin presuponer una generología? Papeles del Psicólogo, 75, 3-12.
15. García-Vega, E., Fernández García, P., y Rico Fernández, R.A. (2005). Género y sexo como variables moduladoras del comportamiento sexual en jóvenes universitarios. Psicothema, 17, 49-56.
16. Gough, H.G. (1952). Identifying psychological femininity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 12, 427-439.
17. Hall, J.A., y Taylor, M.C. (1985). Psychological androgyny and masculinity x femininity interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 429-435.
18. Hathaway, S.R., y McKinley, J.C. (1943). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. New York: Psychological Corporation.
19. Heilbrum, A.B. (1976). Measurement of masculine and feminine sex roles identities as independent dimensions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 183-190.
20. Helgeson, V. (1997). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potencial explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412-428.
21. Holt, C.L., y Ellis, J.B. (1998). Assessing the current validity of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Sex Roles, 39, 929-941.
22. Kaiser, H.F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
23. Koestler, A. (1967). The ghost in the machine. London: Hutchinson.
24. Koestler, A. (1978). Janus. A summing up. New York: Vintage Books.
25. Konrad, A.M., y Harris, C. (2002). Desirability of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory for women and men: A comparison between African Americans and European Americans. Sex Roles, 47, 259-271.
26. Marsh, H.W., y Myers, M.R. (1986). Masculinity, femininity and androgyny: A methodological and theoretical critique. Sex Roles, 14, 397-430.
27. Mateo, M.A., y Fernández, J. (1991). La dimensionalidad de los conceptos de masculinidad y feminidad. Investigaciones Psicológicas, 9, 95-116.
28. Maznah, I., y Choo, P.F. (1986). The factor structure of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory (BSRI). International Journal of Psychology, 21, 31-41.
29. McConaghy, N.(1999). Unresolved issues in scientific sexology. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28, 285-318.
30. Parsons, T., y Bales, R.F. (eds.).(1955). Family, socialization and interaction process. New York: Free Press.
31. Pedhazur, E.J., y Tetenbaum, T.J. (1979). The Bem Sex-Role Inventory: A theoretical and methodological critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 996-1016.
32. Spence, J. (1999). Thirty years of gender research: A personal chronicle. In W. Swann, Jr., J. Langlois, y L. Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and Stereotypes in modern society: The gender science of Janet Toylor Spence (pp. 255-289). Washington. DC: American Psychological Association.
33. Spence, J., y Buckner, C. (2000). Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes and sexist attitude: What do they signify? Personality of Women Quarterly, 24, 44-62.
34. Spence. J., y Helmreich, R. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: their psychological dimensions, correlates and antecedents. Austin. TX: University of Texas Press.
35. Spence, J., Helmreich, R., y Holahan, C. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationship to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviours. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1673-1682.
36. Spence, J.T., Helmreich, R.L., y Stapp, J. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex roles stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. JSAS: Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43-44 (ms. No. 617).
37. Spence, J.T., Helmreich, R.L., y Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on Sex Role Attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29-39.
38. Stake, J.E. (1997). Integrating expressiveness and instrumentality in reallife settings: A new perspective on the benefits of androgyny. Sex Roles, 37, 541-564.
39. Strong, E.K. (1936). Interest of men and women. Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 49-67.
40. Taylor, M., y Hall, J.A. (1982). Psychological androgyny: A review and reformulation of theories, methods and conclusions. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 347-366.
41. Terman, L.M., y Miles, C.C. (1936). Sex and personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
42. Woodhill, B.M., y Samuels, C.A. (2003). Positive and negative androgyny and their relationship with psychological health and well-being. Sex Roles, 48, 555-565.
43. Ward, C.A. (2000). Models and measurement of psychological androgyny: A cross-cultural extension of theory and research. Sex Roles, 43, 529-552.