Relevance judgements within the context of work tasks

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 176, Issue , 2006, Pages 20-29

  Cosijn, Erica ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Human factors; Measurement

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SERVICES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MEASUREMENT THEORY; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

HUMAN FACTORS; INFORMATION SOURCES;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 34547303339     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1164820.1164827     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Tang, R. & Solomon, P. (2001). Use of relevance criteria across stages of document evaluation: on the complementarity of experimental and naturalistic studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(8), 676-685.
2. Cosijn, E. & Ingwersen, P. (2000). Dimensions of Relevance. Information Processing and Management, 36(4), 533-550.
3. Cosijn, E. Relevance Judgements in Information Retrieval. Unpublished DPhil Thesis. University of Pretoria, South Africa (2003)
4. Saracevic, T. (1996). Relevance reconsidered '96. In: Ingwersen, P. & Pors, N.O. eds. Information Science: Integration in Perspective. Copenhagen, Denmark: Royal School of Library and Information Science, 201-218.
5. Ingwersen, P. & Järvelin, K. (2005). The turn: Integration of information seeking and retrieval in context. Dordrecht: Springer.
6. Ingwersen, P. (1996). Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction: elements of a cognitive IR theory. Journal of Documentation, 52(1), 3-50.
7. Barry, C. & Schamber, L. (1998). User's criteria for relevance evaluation: A cross-situational comparison. Information Processing and Management, 34 (2/3), 219-236.
8. Vakkari, P. & Hakala, N. (2000). Changes in relevance criteria and problem stages in task performance. Journal of Documentation, 56(5), 540-562.
9. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
10. Borlund, P. (2000). Evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Doctoral dissertation. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Press.
11. Choi, Y. & Rasmussen, E. (2001). User's relevance criteria in image retrieval in American history. Information Processing and Management, 38, 695-726.
12. Fitzgerald, M.A. & Galloway, C. (2001). Relevance judging, evaluation and decision-making in virtual libraries: A descriptive study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(12), 989-1010.
13. Maglaughlin, K.L. & Sonnenwald, D.H. (2002). User perspectives on relevance criteria: a comparison among relevant, partially relevant, and not-relevant judgements. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(5), 327-342.
14. Spink, A. & Greisdorf, H. (2001). Regions and levels: Measuring and mapping user's relevance judgements. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(2): 161-173.
15. Hernon, P. (1994). Statistics. A component of the research process. Rev. ed. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.