A communicative conception of moral appraisal

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 267-278

  Holroyd, Jules ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Blame; Communicative; Consequentialism; Empirical; Moral psychology; Motivation; Praise; Wallace

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547301432     PISSN: 13862820     EISSN: 15728447     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10677-007-9067-5     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Deci EL, Ryan RM (1987) The support of autonomy and the control of behaviour. J Pers Soc Psychol 53:1024-1037
2. Deci EL, Ryan RM (2000) The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychol Inq 11:227-268
3. Doris JM, Stich S (2005) As a matter of fact: empirical perspectives on ethics. In: Jackson F, Smith M (eds) The Oxford handbook of contemporary analytic philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 114-152
4. Duff A (1986) Trials and punishments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
5. Mill JS (1861/1988) Utilitarianism. In: Crisp R (ed). Oxford University Press, New York
6. Nichols S (2002) How psychopaths threaten moral rationalism; or, is it irrational to be amoral? Monist 85:285-304
7. Nichols S (2004) Sentimental rules: on the natural foundations of moral judgment. Oxford University Press, Oxford
8. Parfit D (1987) Reasons and persons. Clarendon, Oxford
9. Sidgwick H (1907/1981) The methods of ethics, 7th edn. Hackett, Indianapolis
10. Smart JJC, Williams B (1973) Utilitarianism: for and against. Cambridge University Press, London
11. Wallace RJ (1994) Responsibility and the moral sentiments. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA