Numerical linked-cluster algorithms. I. Spin systems on square, triangular, and kagomé lattices

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 75, Issue 6, 2007, Pages

  Rigol, Marcos ^a   Bryant, Tyler ^b   Singh, Rajiv R P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; THERMAL EFFECTS;

HIGH-TEMPERATURE EXPANSIONS (HTE); NUMERICAL LINKED-CLUSTER (NLC) ALGORITHMS; SPIN MODELS;

SPIN DYNAMICS;

EID: 34547293352     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.061118     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. J. Jaklic and P. Prelovsek, Adv. Phys. ADPHAH 0001-8732 10.1080/000187300243381 49, 1 (2000).
2. A. W. Sandvik, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.R14157 59, R14157 (1999).
3. For a general introduction see C. Domb and M. S. Green, Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena (Academic Press, New York, 1974), Vol. 3.
4. A. J. Guttmann, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, edited by, C. Domb, and, J. Lebowitz, (Academic Press, London, 1989), Vol. 13.
5. M. Rigol, T. Bryant, and R. R. P. Singh, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.187202 97, 187202 (2006).
6. A similar idea for ground state properties was considered earlier by A. C. Irving and C. J. Hamer, Nucl. Phys. B NUPBBO 0550-3213 10.1016/0550-3213(84) 90217-7 230, 361 (1984).
7. W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling, Numerical Recipes in Fortran (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1999), Sec. 5.1.
8. J. Oitmaa, C. Hamer, and W-H. Zheng, Series Expansion Methods for Strongly Interacting Lattice Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006).
9. B. Bernu and G. Misguich, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.134409 63, 134409 (2001).
10. R. R. P. Singh, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.39.9760 39, 9760 (1989);
11. J.-K. Kim and M. Troyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2705 80, 2705 (1998).
12. A. W. Sandvik and J. Kurkijarvi, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.5950 43, 5950 (1991);
13. A. W. Sandvik, J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 10.1088/0305-4470/25/13/017 25, 3667 (1992);
14. A. W. Sandvik, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.R14157 59, R14157 (1997).
15. E. Y. Loh, Jr., J. E. Gubernatis, R. T. Scalettar, S. R. White, D. J. Scalapino, and R. L. Sugar, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.41. 9301 41, 9301 (1990).
16. P. Henelius and A. W. Sandvik, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.1102 62, 1102 (2000).
17. M. Troyer and U.-J. Wiese, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.170201 94, 170201 (2005).
18. R. Yu (private communication).
19. V. G. Rousseau, D. P. Arovas, M. Rigol, F. Hébert, G. G. Batrouni, and R. T. Scalettar, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.174516 73, 174516 (2006).
20. A. Priyadarshee, S. Chandrasekharan, J.-W. Lee, and H. U. Baranger, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.115703 97, 115703 (2006).
21. M. Aizenman, E. H. Lieb, R. Seiringer, J. P. Solovej, and J. Yngvason, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.023612 70, 023612 (2004).
22. L. Onsager, Phys. Rev. PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.65.117 65, 117 (1944).
23. B. Bernu, C. Lhuillier, and L. Pierre, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2590 69, 2590 (1992).
24. N. Elstner, R. R. P. Singh, and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1629 71, 1629 (1993);
25. N. Elstner, R. R. P. Singh, and A. P. Young, J. Appl. Phys. JAPIAU 0021-8979 10.1063/1.355521 75, 5943 (1994).
26. S. Chakravarty, B. I. Halperin, and D. R. Nelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.1057 60, 1057 (1988).
27. P. Azaria, B. Delamotte, and D. Mouhanna, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1762 68, 1762 (1992).
28. A. V. Chubukov, T. Senthil, and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.2089 72, 2089 (1994).
29. W. Zheng, J. O. Fjaerestad, R. R. P. Singh, R. H. McKenzie, and R. Coldea, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.057201 96, 057201 (2006);
30. W. Zheng, J. O. Fjaerestad, R. R. P. Singh, R. H. McKenzie, and R. Coldea, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.224420 74, 224420 (2006).
31. O. A. Starykh, A. V. Chubukov, and A. G. Abanov, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.180403 74, 180403 (R) (2006).
32. W. Zheng, R. R. P. Singh, R. H. McKenzie, and R. Coldea, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.134422 71, 134422 (2005).
33. G. H. Wannier, Phys. Rev. PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.79.357 79, 357 (1950).
34. R. M. F. Houtappel, Physica (Amsterdam) PHYSAG 0031-8914 10.1016/0031-8914(50)90130-3 16, 425 (1950).
35. J. Stephenson, J. Math. Phys. JMAPAQ 0022-2488 10.1063/1.1704202 5, 1009 (1964);
36. J. Stephenson, J. Math. Phys. JMAPAQ 0022-2488 10.1063/1.1665154 11, 413 (1970).
37. P. Lecheminant, B. Bernu, C. Lhuillier, L. Pierre, and P. Sindzingre, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.2521 56, 2521 (1997).
38. C. Zeng and V. Elser, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.51. 8318 51, 8318 (1995).
39. R. R. P. Singh and D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1766 68, 1766 (1992).
40. P. Sindzingre, G. Misguich, C. Lhuillier, B. Bernu, L. Pierre, Ch. Waldtmann, and H.-U. Everts, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2953 84, 2953 (2000).
41. V. Elser, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2405 62, 2405 (1989).
42. N. Elstner and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.6871 50, 6871 (1994).
43. Notice, that from the expression given in Ref. we have corrected a sign in a subindex.
44. This limitation, however, can be mitigated by the fact that one can trivially parallelize the NLC calculation. Still, the number of clusters increases exponentially so that only few orders can be gained by parallelization.