Nonlinear optical Galton board

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 75, Issue 6, 2007, Pages

  Navarrete Benlloch, C ^a,b   Perez A ^a   Roldán, Eugenio ^b  

^a INSTITUTO DE FÍSICA CORPUSCULAR IFIC   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAOTIC SYSTEMS; DISPERSION (WAVES); QUANTUM OPTICS; RANDOM PROCESSES; SELF PHASE MODULATION; WAVE FUNCTIONS;

NONELASTIC COLLISIONS; NONLINEARITY STRENGTH; OPTICAL GALTON BOARD; WALKER EVOLUTION;

OPTICAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 34547291959     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.062333     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. R. Motwani and P. Raghavan, Randomized Algorithms (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1995).
2. Y. Aharonov, L. Davidovich, and N. Zagury, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.48.1687 48, 1687 (1993).
3. D. Meyer, J. Stat. Phys. JSTPBS 0022-4715 10.1007/BF02199356 85, 551 (1996).
4. J. Watrous, Proceedings of the 33rd Symposium on the Theory of Computing (ACM Press, New York, 2001), p. 60.
5. E. Farhi and S. Gutmann, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.58.915 58, 915 (1998)
6. A. M. Childs and J. Goldstone, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.042312 70, 042312 (2004).
7. For reviews, see J. Kempe, Contemp. Phys. CTPHAF 0010-7514 10.1080/00107151031000110776 44, 307 (2003)
8. A. Ambainis, Int. J. Quantum Inf. 1, 507 (2003)
9. V. Kendon, Philos. Trans. R. Soc., Ser. A 364, 3407 (2006).
10. V. Kendon, arXiv:quant-ph/0606016.
11. D. Bouwmeester, I. Marzoli, G. P. Karman, W. Schleich, and J. P. Woerdman, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.013410 61, 013410 (1999).
12. B. C. Sanders, S. D. Bartlett, B. Tregenna, and P. L. Knight, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.042305 67, 042305 (2003).
13. P. L. Knight, E. Roldán, and J. E. Sipe, Opt. Commun. OPCOB8 0030-4018 10.1016/j.optcom.2003.09.024 227, 147 (2003)
14. P. L. Knight, E. Roldán, and J. E. Sipe, Opt. Commun. OPCOB8 0030-4018 10.1016/j.optcom.2003.12.059 232, 443 (2004).
15. P.L. Knight, E. Roldán, and J.E. Sipe, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.020301 68, 020301 (R) (2003).
16. A. Wojcik, T. Luczak, P. Kurzynski, A. Grudka, and M. Bednarska, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.180601 93, 180601 (2004).
17. A. Romanelli, A. Auyuanet, R. Siri, G. Abal, and R. Donangelo, Physica A PHYADX 0378-4371 10.1016/j.physa.2005.01.026 352, 409 (2005).
18. O. Buerschaper and K. Burnett, arXiv:quant-ph/0406039.
19. M. C. Bañuls, C. Navarrete, A. Pérez, E. Roldán, and J. C. Soriano, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.062304 73, 062304 (2006).
20. I. Carneiro, New J. Phys. NJOPFM 1367-2630 10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/156 7, 156 (2005).
21. R. J. C. Spreeuw, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.63. 062302 63, 062302 (2001).
22. M. Hillery, J. Bergou, and E. Feldman, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.032314 68, 032314 (2003).
23. H. Jeong, M. Paternostro, and M. S. Kim, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.012310 69, 012310 (2004).
24. E. Roldán and J. C. Soriano, J. Mod. Opt. JMOPEW 0950-0340 10.1080/09500340500309873 52, 2649 (2005).
25. B. Do, M. L. Stohler, S. Balasubramanian, D. S. Elliot, Ch. Eash, E. Fischbach, M. A. Fischbach, A. Mills, and B. Zwickl, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B JOBPDE 0740-3224 10.1364/JOSAB.22.000499 22, 499 (2005).
26. V. Kendon and B. C. Sanders, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.022307 71, 022307 (2005).
27. We must emphasize that Pmu (t) and Pmd (t) are probabilities in a true quantum system, but in a classical system they are intensities, see, e.g., Ref..
28. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/35051009 409, 46 (2001).
29. K. Sanaka, K. J. Resch, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.083601 96, 083601 (2006).
30. C. M. Chandrashekar, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.74. 032307 74, 032307 (2006).
31. We found that the choice Δm=8 is sufficient for our purposes.
32. Except for the already mentioned temporal oscillations around a mean value.