Power of source as a factor in deontic inference

Thinking and Reasoning

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 295-317

  Kilpatrick, S G ^a   Manktelow, K I ^b   Over, D E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547258750     PISSN: 13546783     EISSN: 14640708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13546780601008783     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
2. Baron, J. (2000). Thinking and deciding (3rd ed.). Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Beller, S., Bender, A., & Kuhnmünch, G. (2005). Understanding conditional promises and threats. Thinking and Reasoning, 11, 209-238.
4. Bochner, S., & Insko, C. A. (1966). Communicator discrepancy, source credibility, and opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 614-621.
5. Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning schemas. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 391-416.
6. Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31, 187-276.
7. Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptation for social change. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8. Cummins, D. D. (1996). Dominance hierarchies and the evolution of human reasoning. Minds and Machines, 6, 463-480.
9. Cummins, D. D. (1998). Social norms and other minds: The evolutionary roots of higher cognition. In D. D. Cummins & C. Allen (Eds.), The evolution of mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10. Cummins, D. D. (1999). Cheater detection is modified by social rank: The impact of dominance on the evolution of cognitive functions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 229-248.
11. Cummins, D. D. (2000). How the social environment shaped the evolution of mind. Synthese, 122, 3-28.
12. Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse. London: Penguin.
13. Evans, J. St. B. T. (2002). Logic and human reasoning: An assessment of the deduction paradigm. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 978-996.
14. Evans, J. St. B. T., Handley, S. J., & Over, D. E. (2003). Conditionals and conditional probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 321-355.
15. Evans, J. St. B. T., Newstead, S. E., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1993). Human reasoning. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
16. Evans, J. St. B. T., & Over, D. E. (2004). If. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17. Evans, J. St. B. T., & Twyman-Musgrove, J. (1998). Conditional reasoning with inducements and advice. Cognition, 69, B11-B16.
18. Fairley, N., Manktelow, K., & Over, D. (1999). Necessity, sufficiency, and perspective effects in causal conditional reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 771-790.
19. Fiddick, L., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2000). No interpretation without representation: The role of domain-specific representations and inferences in the Wason selection task. Cognition, 77, 1-79.
20. Fillenbaum, S. (1986). The use of conditionals in inducements and deterrents. In E. C. Traugott, A. ter Meulen, J. S. Reilly, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), On conditionals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628.
22. French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
23. Geis, M. C., & Zwicky, A. M. (1971). On invited inferences. Linguistic Inquiry, 2, 561-566.
24. Gigerenzer, G., & Hug, K. (1992). Domain-specific reasoning: Social contracts, cheating and perspective change. Cognition, 43, 127-171.
25. Holyoak, K. J., & Cheng, P. W. (1995). Pragmatic reasoning from multiple points of view: A response. Thinking and Reasoning, 1, 373-388.
26. Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284.
27. Manktelow, K. I. (1999). Reasoning and thinking. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
28. Manktelow, K. I. (2004). Reasoning and rationality: The pure and the practical. In K. I. Manktelow & M. C. Chung (Eds.), Psychology of reasoning: Theoretical and historical approaches. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
29. Manktelow, K. I., Fairley, N., Kilpatrick, S. G., & Over, D. E. (2000). Pragmatics and strategies for practical reasoning. In W. Schaeken, G. de Vooght, A. Vandierendonck, & G. d'Ydewalle (Eds.), Deductive reasoning and strategies. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
30. Manktelow, K. I., & Over, D. E. (1991). Social roles and utilities in reasoning with deontic conditionals. Cognition, 39, 85-105.
31. Manktelow, K. I., & Over, D. E. (1995). Deontic reasoning. In S. E. Newstead & J. St. B. T. Evans (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking and reasoning: Essays in honour of Peter Wason. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
32. Manktelow, K. I., Sutherland, E. J., & Over, D. E. (1995). Probabilistic factors in deontic reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 1, 201-219.
33. Newstead, S. E., Ellis, M. C., Evans, J. St. B. T., & Dennis, I. (1997). Conditional reasoning with realistic material. Thinking and Reasoning, 3, 49-76.
34. Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1998). A revised rational analysis of the selection task: Exceptions and sequential sampling. In M. Oaksford & N. Chater (Eds.), Rational models of cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35. Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2003). Conditional probability and the cognitive science of conditional reasoning. Mind and Language, 18, 359-379.
36. Oberauer, K., & Wilhelm, O. (2003). The meaning(s) of conditionals: Conditional probabilities, mental models, and personal utilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 680-693.
37. Ohm, E., & Thompson, V. A. (2004). Everyday reasoning with inducements and advice. Thinking and Reasoning, 10, 241-272.
38. Over, D. E., Hadjichristidis, C., Evans, J. St. B. T., Handley, S. J., & Sloman, S. A. (in press). The probability of causal conditionals. Cognitive Psychology.
39. Over, D. E., Manktelow, K. I., & Hadjichristidis, C. (2004). Conditions for the acceptance of deontic conditionals. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 96-105.
40. Politzer, G., & Nguyen-Xuan, A. (1992). Reasoning about conditional promises and warnings: Darwinian algorithms, mental models, relevance judgments or pragmatic schemas? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A., 401-412.
41. Raven, B. H. (1965). Social influence and power. In I. D. Steiner & M. Fishbein (Eds.), Current studies in social psychology. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
42. Ray, J. L., Reynolds, R. A., & Carranza, E. (1989). Understanding choice utterances. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 829-848.
43. Springston, F. J., & Clark, H. H. (1973). "And" and "or", or the comprehension of pseudoimperatives. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 258-272.
44. Stenning, K., & van Lambalgen, M. (2004). The natural history of hypotheses about the selection task: Towards a philosophy of science for investigating human reasoning. In K. I. Manktelow & M. C. Chung (Eds.), Psychology of reasoning: Theoretical and historical approaches. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
45. Stevenson, R. J., & Over, D. E. (2001). Reasoning from uncertain premises: Effects of expertise and conversational context. Thinking and Reasoning, 7, 367-390.
46. Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35-57.
47. Wason, P. C. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 273-281.