Characterizing the relative significance of a test smell

IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, ICSM

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 391-400

  Van Rompaey, Bart ^a   Du Bois, Bart ^a   Demeyer, Serge ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METRIC BASED HEURISTICAL APPROACH; OPEN SOURCE CASE; TEST CODES;

CODES (STANDARDS); COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE; HEURISTIC ALGORITHMS; MARKUP LANGUAGES;

SOFTWARE TESTING;

EID: 34547251862     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICSM.2006.18     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. K. Beck. Simple Smalltalk testing: With patterns. The Smalltalk report, 4(2):16-18, 1994.
2. K. Beck. Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Addison-Wesley, 1999.
3. K. Beck. Test-Driven Development By Example. Addison-Wesley, 2002.
4. K. Beck and E. Gamma. Test infected: Programmers love writing tests. Java Report, 7(3):51-56, 1998.
5. L. Briand, J. Daly, and J. Wuest. A unified framework for coupling measurement in object-oriented systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 25(1):91-121, 1999.
6. D. E. DeLano and L. Rising. Patterns for system testing. In R. Martin, D. Riehle, and F. Buschmann, editors, Pattern Languages of Program Design 3, pages 503-527. Addison-Welsey, 1998.
7. S. Demeyer, S. Ducasse, and O. Nierstrasz. Object-Oriented Reengineering Patterns. Morgan Kaufmann, 2002.
8. A. Deursen, L. Moonen, A. Bergh, and G. Kok. Refactoring test code. In M. Marchesi and G. Succi, editors, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Extreme Programming and Flexible Processes in Software Engineering (XP2001), 2001.
9. G. Doshi. Junit 4.0 in 10 minutes, 2006. online at http://www. instrumentalservices.com/index.php?option= com.content&task=view&id= 45&Itemid=52 (accessed March 22, 2006).
10. E. Dustin. Effective Software Testing. 50 Specific Way to Improve Your Testing. Addison-Wesley, 2003.
11. M. Feathers. Working Effectively with Legacy Code. Prentice Hall, 2005.
12. M. Gaelli, M. Lanza, and O. Nierstrasz. Towards a taxonomy of SUnit tests. In Proceedings of ESUG 2005 (13th International Smalltalk Conference), 2005.
13. P. Hamill. Unit Test Frameworks, chapter Chapter 3: The xUnit Family of Unit Test Frameworks. O'Reilly, 2004.
14. A. Hunt and D. Thomas. Pragmatic Unit Testing in C# with NUnit. The Pragmatic Programmers, 2004.
15. J. Langr. Agile Java Crafting Code with Test-Driven Development, chapter Lesson 15: Assertions and Annotations. Prentice Hall, 2005.
16. W. Li and S. Henry. Object-oriented metrics that predict maintainability. Journal of Systems and Software, 23(2): 111-122, February 1993.
17. R. Marinescu. Detection strategies: Metrics-based rules for detecting design flaws. In 20th International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM'04). IEEE Computer Society, 2004.
18. G. Meszaros. XUnit Test Patterns: Refactoring Test Code. Addison-Wesley, to be published in 2007. online version at http://xunitpatterns. com/ (accessed March 21st, 2006).
19. M. Pelgrim. Dive into Python. Apress, 2004.
20. A. J. Riel. Object-Oriented Design Heuristics. Addison-Wesley, 1996.