Everything

Nous-Supplement: Philosophical Perspectives

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 415-465

  Williamson, Timothy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547232939     PISSN: 15208583     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1520-8583.2003.00017.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bach, K. [CI] 'Conversational impliciture', Mind and Language 9 (1994): 124-162.
2. Bach. K. [QQC] 'Quantification, qualification and context: a reply to Stanley and Szabó', Mind and Language 15 (2000): 262-283.
3. Barwise, J., and Cooper, R. [GQNL] 'Generalized quantifiers and natural language'. Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (1981): 159-219.
4. Boolos, G. [RPSC] 'A reply to Parsons' "Sets and Classes'", in Boolos [LLL].
5. Boolos, G. [BBVV] 'To be is to be a value of a variable (or to be some values of some variables', The Journal of Philosophy 81 (1984): 430-449.
6. Boolos, G. [NP] 'Nominalist platonism', The Philosophical Review 94 (1985): 327-344.
7. Boolos, G. [WC] 'Whence the contradiction?', Aristotelian Society supplementary volume 67 (1993): 213-233.
8. Boolos, G. [LLL] Logic, Logic and Logic. Harvard, Cambridge MA: 1998.
9. Bostock, D. [MHOL] 'On motivating higher-order logic', in Smiley [PL].
10. Bradley, F. H. [AR] Appearance and Reality, 2nd ed. London: George Allen, 1897.
11. Cartwright, R. [SE] 'Speaking of everything', Noûs 28 (1994): 1-20.
12. Dummett, M. A. E. [FPL] Frege: Philosophy of Language, 2nd edition. London: Duckworth. 1981.
13. Dummett, M. A. E. [FPM] Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics. Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press, 1991.
14. Forster. T. E. [STUS] Set Theory with a Universal Set: Exploring an Untyped Universe, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
15. Friedman, H. [CTE] 'A complete theory of everything: validity in the universal domain', www.math.ohio-state.edu/∼friedman/ (1999).
16. Geach, P. T. [RG] Reference and Generality: An Examination of Some Medieval and Modern Theories, 3rd ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1980.
17. Glanzberg, M. [QR] 'Quantification and realism', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, forthcoming.
18. Grim, P. [IU] The Incomplete Universe: Totality, Knowledge and Truth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.
19. Harris, J. H. [LLA] 'What's so logical about the "logical" axioms?", Studia Logica 41 (1982): 159-171.
20. Higginbotham, J. [HOLNL] 'On higher-order logic and natural language', in Smiley [PL].
21. Kaplan, D. [D] 'Demonstratives: an essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals', in J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein, eds., Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
22. Kripke. S. A. [WRPL] Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Oxford: Blackwell, 1982.
23. Lewis, D. K. [PW] On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.
24. Lewis, D. K. [PC] Parts of Classes. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.
25. McGee, V. [TPTTC] 'Two problems with Tarski's theory of consequence', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 92 (1992): 273-292.
26. McGee, V. [E] '"Everything"', in G. Sher and R. Tieszen, eds., Between Logic and Intuition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
27. McGee, V. [UUQ] 'Universal universal quantification', in J. C. Beall, ed., Liars and Heaps. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003 (forthcoming).
28. Quine, W. V. [FLPV] From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1953.
29. Quine, W. V. [PL] Philosophy of Logic. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1970.
30. Rayo, A. [WO] 'Words and objects', Noûs 36 (2002): 436-464.
31. Rayo, A. [WEME] 'When does "everything" mean everything?', Analysis 63 (2003): 100-106.
32. Rayo, A., and Uzquiano, G. [TTSC] 'Toward a theory of second-order consequence', Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (1999): 315-325.
33. Rayo, A., and Williamson, T. [CTUFL] 'A completeness theorem for unrestricted first-order languages', in J. C. Beall, ed., Liars and Heaps. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003, (forthcoming).
34. Rayo, A., and Yablo, S. [NDN] 'Nominalism through de-nominalization', Noûs 35 (2001): 74-92.
35. Shapiro, S. [FF] Foundations without Foundationalism: A Case for Second-Order Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
36. Shapiro, S. [LL] The Limits of Logic: Higher-Order Logic and the Löwenheim-Skolem Theorem. Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1996.
37. Simons, P. [HOQOC] 'Higher-order quantification and ontological commitment', Dialectica 51 (1997): 255-271.
38. Smiley, T., ed. [PL] Philosophical Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press for the British Academy.
39. Soames, S. [IDD] Incomplete definite descriptions', Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27 (1986): 349-375.
40. Stanley, J. [NR] 'Nominal restriction', in G. Peters and G. Preyer, eds., Logical Form and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
41. Stanley, J., and Szabó, Z. G. [QDR] 'On quantifier domain restriction', Mind and Language 15 (2000): 219-261.
42. Stanley, J., and Williamson, T. [QCD] 'Quantifiers and context dependence', Analysis 55 (1995): 291-295.
43. Tarski. A. [CLC] 'On the concept of logical consequence', in Logic Semantics, Metamathematics, translated by J. H. Woodger, 2nd edition, J. Corcoran, ed. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1983.
44. Westerståhl, D. [DCS] 'Determiners and context sets', in J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen eds., Generalized Quantifiers in Natural Language. Dordrecht: Foris, 1985.
45. Williamson, T. [EE] 'Equivocation and existence', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 87 (1987/8): 109-127.
46. Williamson, T. [BP] 'Bare possibilia', Erkenntnis 48 (1998): 257-273.
47. Williamson, T. [EC] 'Existence and contingency", Aristotelian Society, sup. vol. 73 (1999): 181-203.
48. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (2000): 321-343 (117-139 in unbound version).
49. Williamson, T. [NFO] 'The necessary framework of objects", Topoi 19 (2000): 201-208.
50. Wittgenstein, L. [TLP] Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, translated by D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1961.
51. Wright, C. J. G. [FGS] 'Why Frege did not deserve his granum sails: a note on the paradox of "The Concept Horse" and the ascription of bedeutungen to predicates', Grazer Philosophische Studien 55 (1998): 239-263.
52. Yi, B-U. [LLP] 'The language and logic of plurals', Journal of Philosophical Logic, forthcoming.