Do architecture design methods meet architects' needs?

2007 Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA'07)

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 5-

  Falessi, Davide ^a   Cantone, Giovanni ^a   Kruchten, Philippe ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; INFORMATION USE; NUMERICAL METHODS;

INTRINSIC ELEMENTS; ORDINAL SCALES; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE DESIGN METHODS (SADM);

SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 34547228258     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WICSA.2007.23     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (49)

1. P. America, H. Obbink, & E. Rommes, "Multi-view variation modeling for scenario analysis", Proceedings of Fifth International Workshop on Product Family Engineering 2005, Springer-Verlag, pp. 44-65.
2. nd ed. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 2003.
3. C. Choppy & G. Reggio, "Using UML for Problem Frame Oriented Software Development". 13th International Conference on Intelligent & Adaptive Systems and Software Engineering, 2004, pp 239-244
4. L. Chung, D. Gross & E. Yu, "Architectural Design to Meet Stakeholder Requirements", First Working IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, 1999.
5. P. Clements, F. Bachmann, L. Bass, D. Garlan, J. Ivers, R. Little, R. Nord, J. Stafford, "Documenting Software Architectures: Views and Beyond", Pearson Education, 2003.
6. P. Clements, L. Northrop, "Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns", Addison-Wesley, 2001.
7. L. Dobrica & E. Niemela, "A survey on software architecture analysis methods," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 28 (7), 2002, pp. 638-653.
8. H. Eguiluz & M. Barbacci "Interactions among techniques addressing quality attributes", CMU/SEI-2003-TR-003.
9. Empirical Software Engineering, An International Journal, V.R. Basili and L.C. Briand (eds) Springer.
10. D. Falessi, M. Becker, & G. Cantone, "Design Decision Rationale: Experiences and Steps Ahead Towards Systematic Use", Workshop on SHAring and Reusing architectural Knowledge at the 9th International Conference on Software Reuse, 2006.
11. D. Falessi, G. Cantone, M. Becker, "Documenting Design Decision Rationale to Improve Individual and Team Design Decision Making: An Experimental Evaluation", ISESE 2006.
12. R.G. Fichman and CF. Kemerer, Object-oriented and conventional analysis and design methodologies," IEEE Computer, 25 (10), 1992, pp. 22-39.
13. M. Fowler, "Analysis Patterns: Reusable Object Models", Addison Wesley, 1997.
14. P. Giorgini, J. Mylopoulos, & M. Pistore, "The Tropos methodology: an overview", in: F. Bergenti, M.-P. Gleizes, F. Zambonelli (Eds.), Methodologies and Software Engineering for Agent Systems: The Agent-Oriented Software Engineering Handbook, Kluwer Academic Press, Boston, MA; London, 2004, p. 505
15. P. Gruenbacher, A. Egyed, & N. Medvidovic "Reconciling Software Requirements and Architectures with Intermediate Models". Journal on Software and System Modeling, December 2003.
16. C. Hofmeister, R. Nord & D. Soni, "Applied Software Architecture", Addison-Wesley, Boston 1999.
17. C. Hofmeister, P. Kruchten, R. Nord, H. Obbink, A. Ran & P. America, "Generalizing a Model of Software Architecture Design from Five Industrial Approaches", WICSA 2005.
18. S. Hong, G. van den Goor, & S. Brinkkemper, "A formal approach to the comparison of object-oriented analysis and design methodologies," in Proceedings of 26th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Wailea, HI, USA, 1993, pp. iv 689-698.
19. IEEE 1471:2000, "Recommended practice for architectural description of software intensive systems", Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE, 2000.
20. 21st IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, (ASE 2006), http://www.ase-conference.jp.
21. A. Jansen & J. Bosch, "Evaluation of Tool Support for Architectural Evolution", International Conference on Automated Software Engineering 2004, pp. 375-378.
22. J. Kim & F. Lerch, "Towards a model of cognitive process in logical design: comparing object-oriented and traditional functional decomposition software methodologies", Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI Proceedings, May 1992, pp.489-498.
23. P. Kruchten, "An ontology of architectural design decisions in software intensive systems". In 2nd Groningen Workshop on Software Variability, pp 54-61, December 2004.
24. P. Kruchten. "Mommy, Where Do Software Architectures Come from?" 1st International Workshop on Architectures for Software Systems, Seattle, WA, April 1995.
25. rd ed. Addison-Wesley-Longman, 2003.
26. P. Kruchten, "The 4+1 View Model of Architecture," IEEE Software 12 (6), 1995, pp. 42-50.
27. P. Kruchten, H. Obbink, & J. Stafford, "The Past, Present and Future of Software Architecture", IEEE Software, March/April 2006.
28. W. Liu, S. Easterbrook, "Eliciting Architectural Decisions from Requirements using a Rule-based Framework", STRAW03 located at ICSE 2003
29. L. Liu & E. Yu, "From Requirements to Architectural Design Using Goals and Scenarios". In: Proceedings of the ICSE-2001 (STRAW 2001). Toronto, Canada.
30. Model Driven Architecture Guide, http://www.omg.org/docs/omg/03-06-01.pdf
31. B. Nuseibeh, Weaving Together Requirements and Architectures. IEEE Computer 34, (3): 115-117. 2001
32. Object Management Group web page, http://www.omg.org/
33. A. Ran, "ARES Conceptual Framework for Software Architecture" In: Jazayeri, M., Ran, A., van der Linden, F. (Eds.), Software Architecture for Product Families Principles and Practice, Addison-Wesley, pp. 1-29
34. D. Rombach, The Fraunhofer Institute of Experimental Software Engineering, http://www.iese.fhg.de/
35. R. Roshandel, B. Schmerl, N. Medvidovic, D. Garlan, and D. Zhang, "Understanding Tradeoffs among Different Architectural Modeling Approaches," WICSA 2004, Oslo, Norway, 2004.
36. G. Ruhe, Software Engineering Decision Support, Special Issue International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 13 (5), Oct 2003.
37. G. Ruhe, Software Engineering Decision Support Laboratory, from http://www.seng-decisionsupport.ucalgary.ca/research.htm
38. 2nd International Workshop From SofTware Requirements to Architectures, STRAW03, at the ICSE 2003, http://se.uwaterloo.ca/~straw03/, last access: 25-05-206.
39. Sixth Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, WICSA 2007, http://www.gv.psu.edu/WICSA2007/, last accessed: 25-05-206.
40. R. Sharble R. & S. Cohen, "The object-oriented brewery: a comparison of two object-oriented development methods," ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 18 (2), 1993, pp. 60-73.
41. M. Shaw & D. Garlan. "Software Architecture. Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline." Prentice Hall, 1996.
42. H. Sol, "A Feature Analysis of Information Systems Design Methodologies Through Process Modelling," Proc. 1st Int'l Conf software Process, IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos, 1991.
43. X. Song & L. Osterweil, "Experience with an approach to comparing software design methodologies," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 20, (5), 1994, pp. 364-384.
44. X. Song, & L. Osterweil, "Toward Objective, Systematic Design-Method Comparisons", IEEE Software, 9 (3), pp. 43-53, 1992.
45. The 2006 Experimental Software Engineering International Week (ESEIW 2006), http://www.cos.ufrj.br/~ght/eseiw2006.htm
46. W. Tracz, DSSA (Domain-Specific Software Architecture) Pedagogical Example. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 1995
47. J. Tyree & A. Akerman, "Architecture Decisions: Demystifying Architecture", IEEE Software, 22, (2), Mar/Apr, 2005.
48. C. Wohlin, P. Runeson, M. Host, M.C. Ohlsson, B. Regnell, & A. Wesslén: "Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction", The Kluwer International Series in Software Engineering, 2000.
49. R. Wieringa, "A Survey of Structured and Object-Oriented Software Specification Methods and Techniques," ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 30, no. 4, 1998, pp. 459-527.