Video search reranking via information bottleneck principle

Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia, MM 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 35-44

  Hsu, Winston H ^a   Kennedy, Lyndon S ^a   Chang, Shih Fu ^a  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Information bottleneck principle; Multimodal fusion; Video search

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DATA FUSION; FEATURE EXTRACTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TEXT PROCESSING;

INFORMATION BOTTLENECK (IB) PRINCIPLE; MULTIMODAL FUSION; VIDEO SEARCH;

VIDEO STREAMING;

EID: 34547226504     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1180639.1180654     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. A. Amir et al. IBM Research TRECVID-2005 video retrieval system. In TRECVID Workshop, Washington DC, 2005.
2. Alias-i. Lingpipe named entity tagger. In http://www.alias-i.com/ lingpipe/.
3. T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas. Elements of Information Theory. Wiley, New York, 1991.
4. K. M. Donald and A. F. Smeaton. A comparison of score, rank and probability-based fusion methods for video shot retrieval. In CIVR, Singapore, 2005.
5. R. Fergus, P. Perona, and A. Zisserman. A visual category filter for google images. In CVPR, May 2004.
6. S. Gordon, H. Greenspan, and J. Goldberger. Applying the information bottleneck principle to unsupervised clustering of discrete and continuous image representations. In ICCV, 2003.
7. A. G. Hauptmann and M. G. Christel. Successful approaches in the tree video retrieval evaluations. In ACM Multimedia 2004, New York, 2004.
8. W. H. Hsu and S.-F. Chang. Visual cue cluster construction via information bottleneck principle and kernel density estimation. In CIVR, Singapore, 2005.
9. W. H. Hsu and S.-F. Chang. Topic tracking across broadcast news videos with visual duplicates and semantic concepts. In ICIP, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2006.
10. J. G. Carbonell et al. Translingual information retrieval: A comparative evaluation. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1997.
11. L. Kennedy, P. Natsev, and S.-F. Chang. Automatic discovery of query class dependent models for multimodal search. In ACM Multimedia, Singapore, November 2005.
12. H. Liu. Montylingua: An end-to-end natural language processor with common sense. In http://web.media.mit.edu/∼hugo/montylingua.
13. X. Liu and W. B. Croft. Cluster-based retrieval using language models. In SIGIR, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK, 2004.
14. N. Slonim et al. Unsupervised document classification using sequential information maximization. In 25th A CM int. Conf. on Research and Development of Information Retireval, 2002.
15. A. Natsev, M. R-. Naphade, and J. Tesic. Learning the semantics of multimedia queries and concepts from a small number of examples. In ACM Multimedia, pages 598-607, Singapore, 2005.
16. S. E. Robertson et al. Okapi at TREC4. In Text REtrieval Conference, pages 21-30, 1992.
17. S.-F. Chang et al. Columbia University TRECVID 2005 video search and high-level feature extraction. In TRECVID Workshop, Waishington DC, 2005.
18. D. W. Scott. Multivariate Density Estimation: Theory, Practice, and Visualization. Wiley-Interscience, 1992.
19. N. Slonim and N. Tishby. Agglomerative information bottleneck. In NIPS, 1999.
20. T.-C. Chang et al. TRECVID 2004 search and feature extraction task by NUS PRIS. In TRECVID Workshop, Waishington DC, 2004.
21. TRECVID. TREC Video Retrieval Evaluation. In http://www-nlpir.nist. gov/projects/trecvid/.
22. R. Yan, A. Hauptmann, and R. Jin. Multimedia-search with pseudo-relevance feedback. In CIVR, Urbana-Champaign, IL, 2003.