An experimental study on the effects of exitability and correctability on electronic negotiation

Negotiation Journal

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 283-305

  Hatta, Taketoshi ^a   Ohbuchi, Ken Ichi ^b   Fukuno, Mitsuteru ^c  

^a GIFU UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE   (Japan)

^b TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c HOKKAI GAKUEN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Correctability; Electronic negotiation; Exitability; Negotiation

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547210657     PISSN: 07484526     EISSN: 15719979     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1571-9979.2007.00144.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Arriaga, X. B. C. E. Rusbult. 1998. Standing in my partner's shoes: Partner perspective taking and reactions to accommodative dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24 (9 927 948.
2. Carnevale, P. J. T. M. Probst. 1997. Conflict on the Internet. In Culture of the Internet, edited by S. Kiesler. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Fisher, R. W. Ury. 1981. Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Boston : Houghton-Mifflin.
4. Frase, L. T. 1987. Creating intelligent environments for computer use in writing. Contemporary Educational Psychology 12 : 212 221.
5. Giebels, E., C. K. W. De Dreu E. E. Van de Vliert. 2000. Interdependence in negotiation: Effects of exit options and social motive on distributive and integrative negotiation. European Journal of Social Psychology 30 : 255 272.
6. Griffith, T. L. G. B. Northcraft. 1994. Distinguishing between the forest and the trees: Media, features, and methodology in electronic communication research. Organization Science 5 (2 272 285.
7. Güth, W., R. Schmittberger B. Schwarze. 1982. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3 : 367 388.
8. Hayes, J. R. L. S. Flower. 1986. Writing research and the writer. American Psychologist 41 (10 1106 1113.
9. Hiltz, S. R. 1982. The impact of a computerized conferencing system on the productivity of scientific research communities. Behavior and Information Technology 1 (2 185 195.
10. Kawaura, Y., K. Ikeda, T. Kawakami Y. Furukawa. 1989. Telecommunication and information behavior: Survey research of current statues of telecommunication. Research Report Institute of Social Policies for Electronic Communication In Japanese
11. Siegel T. W. McGuire. 1984. Social psychology aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist 39 : 1123 1134.
12. Moore, D. A., T. R. Kurtzberg, L. L. Thompson M. W. Morris. 1999. Long and short routes to success in electronically mediated negotiations: Group affiliations and good vibrations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 77 (1 22 43.
13. Murray, D. M. 1978. Internal revision: A process of discovery. In Research on composing: Points of departure, edited by C. R. Cooper L. Odell. Urbana, IL : National Council of Teachers of English.
14. Nystrand, M. M. Himley. 1984. Written text as social interaction. Theory into Practice 23 (3 198 207.
15. Ohbuchi, K., S. Chiba O. Fukushima. 1996. Mitigation of interpersonal conflicts: Politeness and time pressure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22 (10 1035 1042.
16. Pinkley, R. L. 1995. Impact of knowledge regarding alternatives to settlement in dyadic negotiations: Whose knowledge counts? Journal of Applied Psychology 80 (3 403 417.
17. Pinkley, R. L., M. A. Neale R. J. Bennett. 1994. The impact of alternatives to settlement in dyadic negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Decision Processes 57 : 97 116.
18. Pruitt, D. G. P. J. D. Carnevale. 1993. Negotiation in social conflict. Buckingham : Open University Press.
19. Pruitt, D. G. S. A. Lewis. 1975. Development of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31 (4 621 633.
20. Rusbult, C. E., J. Verette, G. A. Whitney, L. F. Slovik I. Lipkus. 1991. Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60 (1 53 78.
21. Solomon, J. S. B. A. Jain. 1999. A study of human and technology factors on the efficacy of computer supported negotiation. Unpublished manuscript).
22. Sommers, N. 1980. Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College Composition and Communication 31 : 378 387.
23. Sproull, L. S. Kiesler. 1991. Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
24. Stuhlmacher, A. F. A. E. Walters. 1999. Gender differences in negotiation outcome: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 52 (3 653 677.
25. Thompson, L. R. Hastie. 1990. Social perception in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 47 (1 98 123.
26. Traxler, M. J. M. A. Gernsbacher. 1992. Improving written communication through minimal feedback. Language and Cognitive Processes 7 (1 1 22.
27. Walters, A. E., A. F. Stuhlmacher L. L. Meyer. 1998. Gender and negotiator competitiveness: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76 (1 1 29.
28. Wheeler, M. 1995. Computers and negotiation: Backing into the future. Negotiation Journal 11 (2 169 175.