Progress and trend on near-field problems in civil engineering

Acta Seismologica Sinica English Edition

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 105-114

  Li, Shuang ^a   Xie, Li Li ^a,b  

^a HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF GEOPHYSICS   (China)

Author keywords

Influences on civil structures; Inherent characteristics of ground motions; Near fault; Near field; Near source

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547210377     PISSN: 10009116     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11589-007-0105-0     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. International Conference of Building Official. 1997. 1997 Uniform Building Code: Vol.2 [S]. Whittier, California: International Conference of Building Official, 2:34-35.
2. Abrahamson N A and Somerville P G. 1996. Effects of the hanging wall and foot wall on ground motions recorded during the Northridge earthquake [J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 86(1B): 93-99.
3. Agrawal A K and He W L. 2002. A close-form approximation of near-fault ground motion pulses for flexible structures [C/CD]//Smyth A. Proceedings of the 15th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference. New York; Columbia University, Paper No. 367.
4. Alavi B. 2000. Effects of near-fault ground motions on frame structure [D][Ph. D Dissertation]. California: University of California, Berkeley, 69-72.
5. Anderson J C and Bertero V V. 1987. Uncertainties in establishing design earthquakes [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 113(8): 1709-1724.
6. Archuleta R J and Hartzell S H. 1981. Effects of fault finiteness on near-source ground motion [J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 71(4): 939-957.
7. Baez J I and Miranda E. 2000. Amplification factors to estimate inelastic displacement demands for the design of structures in the near field [C/CD]//Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Auckland, New Zealand: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 1561.
8. Bertero V V, Mahin S A, Herrera R A. 1978. Aseismic design implications of near-fault San Fernando earthquake records [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 6(1): 31-42.
9. Bolt B A. 1971. The San Fernando valley earthquake of February 9, 1971-data on seismic hazards [J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 61(2): 501-510.
10. Bozorgnia Y, Niazi M, Campbell K W. 1995. Characteristics of free-field vertical ground motion during the Northridge earthquake [J]. Earthquake Spectra, 11(4): 515-525.
11. Bray J D and Rodriguez-Marek A. 2004. Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 24(11): 815-828.
12. Chopra A K and Chintanapakdee C. 1998. Accuracy of response spectrum estimates of structural response to near-field earthquake ground motions: Preliminary results [C/CD]//Proceedings of the ASCE Structures World Conference. Oxford, England: Elsevier Science Ltd, Paper No. T136-1.
13. Chopra A K. and Chintanapakdee C. 2001. Comparing response of SDF systems to near-fault and far-fault earthquake motions in the context of spectral regions [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 30(12); 1 769-1 789.
14. Fu Q and Menun C. 2004. Seismic-environment-based simulation of near-fault ground motions [C/CD]//Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver B C, Canada: Mira Digital Publishing, Paper No. 322.
15. Hall J F, Heaton T H, Halling M W, et al. 1995. Near-source ground motion and its effects on flexible buildings [J]. Earthquake Spectra, 11(4): 569-604.
16. Housner G W and Hudson D E. 1958. The Port Hueneme [California] earthquake of March 18, 1957 [J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 48(2): 163-168.
17. Huang C T. 2003. Considerations of multimode structural response for near-field earthquakes [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 129(4): 458-467.
18. HUANG Jian-wen and ZHU Xi. 2003. Inelastic response analysis for the SDOF structures under near-fault earthquakes [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 13(11): 59-65 (in Chinese).
19. Iwan W D. 1997. Drift spectrum: Measure of demand for earthquake ground motions [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 123(4); 397-404.
20. Jangid R S and Kelly J M. 2001. Base isolation for near-fault motions [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 30(5): 691-707.
21. Kikuchi M, Dan K, Yashiro K. 2000. Seismic behavior of a reinforced concrete building due to large vertical ground motions in near-source regions [C/CD]//Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Auckland, New Zealand: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 1876.
22. LI Shuang. 2005. Effect of near-fault pulse-like ground motions on RC frame structures [D]: [MS Dissertation]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 31-33 (in Chinese).
23. Li X L and Zhu X. 2004. Study on near-fault design spectra of seismic design code [C]//Liu W Q, Yuan F G, Chang P C. 3rd International Conference on Earthquake Engineering: New Frontier and Research Transformation. Beijing: Intellectual Property Publishing House: 147-152.
24. LI Xin-le and ZHU Xi. 2004a. Study on equivalent velocity pulse of near-fault ground motions [J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 17(6): 697-706.
25. LI Xin-le and ZHU Xi. 2004b. Influence by near-fault ground motion of moderate and minor earthquakes [J]. Earthquake Resistant Engineering, 4; 43-46 (in Chinese).
26. Loh C H, Wan S, Liao W I. 2002. Effects of hysteretic model on seismic demands: Consideration of near-fault ground motions [J]. The Structural Design of Tall Buildings, 11(3): 155-169.
27. MacRae G A and Mattheis J. 2000. Three-dimensional steel building response to near-fault motions [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 126(1): 117-126.
28. MacRae G A, Morrow D V, Roeder C W. 2001. Near-fault ground motion effects on simple structures [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 127(9): 996-1004.
29. Makris N and Black C. 2003. Dimensional analysis of inelastic structures subjected to near fault ground motions [R]. California: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, Report No. 03-05, 89-91.
30. Makris N and Chang S P. 1998. Effect of damping mechanisms on the response of seismically isolated structures [R]. California: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, Report No. 98-06, 56-57.
31. Malhotra P K. 1999. Response of buildings to near-field pulse-like ground motions [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 28(11): 1309-1326.
32. Mavroeidis G P. 2004. Modeling and simulation of near-fault strong ground motions for earthquake engineering applications [D] [Ph D Dissertation]. New York: State University of New York at Buffalo, 44-46.
33. Menun C and Fu Q. 2002. An analytical model for near-fault ground motions and the response of SDOF systems [C/CD]//Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. 7th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Boston, Massachusetts: Mira Digital Publishing, Paper No. 00011
34. Ministry of Construction. 2001. Code for Seismic Design of Building OB50011-2001 [S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 16-18 (in Chinese).
35. NI Yong-jun and ZHU Xi. 2004. Analysis of acceleration peak ratios and response spectra for near-fault earthquakes [J]. Journal of Northern Jiaotong University, 28(4); 1-5 (in Chinese).
36. Roberts M W and Lutes L D. 2003. Potential for structural failure in the seismic near field [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 29(8): 927-934.
37. Shabestari K T and Yamazaki F. 2003. Near-fault spatial variation in strong ground motion due to rupture directivity and hanging wall effects from the Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32(14): 2197-2219.
38. Singh J P. 1985. Earthquake ground motions: Implications for designing structures and reconciling structural damage [J]. Earthquake Spectra, 1(2): 239-270.
39. Somerville P G and Graves R. 1993. Conditions that give rise to unusually large long period ground motions [J]. The Structural Design of Tall Buildings, 2: 211-232.
40. Somerville P Q, Smith N F, Graves R W, et al. 1997. Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity [J]. Seismological Research Letters, 68(1): 199-222.
41. Somerville P G. 2000. Seismic hazard evaluation [C/CD]//Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Auckland, New Zealand: New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 2833.
42. Somerville P G. 2002. Characterizing near fault ground motion for the design and evaluation of bridges [C]//Proceedings of the 3th National Seismic Conference and Workshop on Bridges and Highways. New York: State University of New York at Buffalo: 137-148.
43. Stewart JP, Chiou S J, Bray J D, et al. 2001. Ground motion evaluation procedures for performance-based design [R]. California: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, Report No. 01-09, 63-67.
44. Wang G Q, Zhou X Y, Zhang P Z, et al. 2002. Characteristics of amplitude and duration for near fault strong ground motion from the 1999 Chi-Chi Taiwan Earthquake [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22(1): 73-96.
45. WU Xin and ZHU Xi. 2003. Effect of velocity pulse in near field ground motions and certification of regression equations to simple impact [J]. Journal of Northern Jiaotong University, 27(1): 36-39 (in Chinese).
46. YU Yan-xiang and GAO Meng-tan. 2001. Effect of the hanging wall and footwall on peak acceleration during the Chi-Chi earthquake, Taiwan [J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 14(6): 654-659 (in Chinese).