Using an experimental design to identify and quantify the effects of environment related test parameters on the in vitro mucoadhesivity testing of a propanolol buccal tablet

Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 709-716

  Munasur, Ashmitha P ^a   Govender, Thirumala ^a   Mackraj, Irene ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Experimental design; Mucoadhesivity test methods; Polymeric tablet; Propranolol

Indexed keywords

PROPRANOLOL;

ARTICLE; IN VITRO STUDY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TABLET FORMULATION;

ADHESIVENESS; ADMINISTRATION, BUCCAL; ADRENERGIC BETA-ANTAGONISTS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POLYMERS; PROPRANOLOL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TABLETS; TECHNOLOGY, PHARMACEUTICAL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34547195324     PISSN: 03639045     EISSN: 15205762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03639040701199282     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Accili, D., Menghi, G., Bonacacucina, G., Martino, P. D., & Palmieri, G. F. (2004). Mucoadhesion dependence of pharmaceutical polymers on mucosa characteristics. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 22, 225-234.
2. Ahuja, A., Khar, R. K., & Ali, J. (1997). Mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 23, 489-515.
3. Akbari, J., Nokhodchi, A., Farid, D., Adrangui, M., Siahi-Shadbad, M. R., & Saeedi, M. (2004). Development and evaluation of buccoadhesive propranolol hydrochloride tablet formulations: Effect of fillers. IL Farmaco. 59, 155-161.
4. Caramella, C., Bonferoni, M. C., Rossi, S., & Ferrari, F. (1994). Rheological and tensile tests for the assessment of polymer-mucin interactions. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 40, 213-217.
5. Chary, R. B., Vani, G., & Rao, Y. M. (1999). In vitro and in vivo adhesion testing of mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 25, 685-690.
6. Chen, W. G., & Hwang, G. C. C. (1992). Adhesive and in vitro release characteristics of propranolol bioadhesive disc system. Int. J. Pharm., 82, 61-66.
7. Corbo, M., Lia, J. C., & Chien, Y. W. (1990). Bioavailability of propranolol following oral and transdermal administration in rabbits. J. Pharm. Sci., 79, 584-587.
8. Dayal, P., Pillay, V., Babu, R. J., & Singh, M. Box-Behnken Design in the development of a nasal delivery system of model drug hydroxyurea: characterization of viscosity. AAPS PharmSciTech., 6, E573-E585.
9. Duchene, D., & Ponchel, G. (1997). Bioadhesion of solid oral dosage forms, why and how? Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 44, 15-23.
10. Gomeni, R., Bianchetti, G., Sega, R., & Morselli, P. L. (1997). Pharmacokinetics of propranolol in normal healthy volunteers. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm., 5, 183-191.
11. Gupta, V. K., Assmus, M. W., Bekert, T. E., & Price, J. C. (2001). A novel pH and time based multi-unit potential colonic drug delivery system. II. Optimisation of multiple response variables. Int. J. Pharm., 213, 93-102.
12. Guyot, M., & Fawaz, F. (2000). Design and in vitro evaluation of adhesive matrix for transdermal delivery of propranolol. Int. J. Pharm., 204, 171-182.
13. Hagerstrom, H., & Edsman, K. (2001). Interpretation of mucoadhesive properties of polymer gel preparations using a tensile strength method. J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 53, 1589-1599.
14. Hagerstrom, H., Paulsson, M., & Edsman, K. (2000). Evaluation of mucoadhesion for two polyelectrolyte gels in simulated physiological conditions using a rheological method. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 9, 301-309.
15. Hassan, E. E., & Gallo, J. M. (1990). Simple rheological method for the in vitro assessment of mucin polymer bioadhesive bond strength. Pharm. Res., 7, 491-495.
16. Helliwell, M., Martin, G. P., & Marriot, C. (1990). The effect of temperature and time on the in vitro adhesion of putative mucoadhesives to mucus. J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 42, 130.
17. Henriksen, I., Green, K. L. Smart, J. D., Smistad, G., & Karsel, J. (1997). Bioadhesion of hydrated chitosans: An in vitro and in vivo study. Int. J. Pharm., 145, 231-240.
18. Jacques, Y., & Buri, P. (1992). Optimisation of an ex vivo method for bioadhesion quantification. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 38, 195-198.
19. Jones, D. S., Woolfson, A. D., & Brown, A. F. (1997). Textural, viscoelastic and mucoadhesive properties of pharmaceutical gels composed of cellulose polymers. Int. J. Pharm., 151, 223-233.
20. Lejoyeux, F., Ponchel, G., & Duchene, D. (1989a). Influence of some technological parameters on the bioadhesive characteristics of polyacrylic and matrices. S.T.P. Pharma., 5, 893-898.
21. Lejoyeux, F., Ponchel, G., Wouessidjewe, D., Peppas, N. A., & Duchene, D. (1989b). Bioadhesive tablets: Influence of the testing medium composition on bioadhesion. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 15, 2037-2048.
22. Leung, S. H. S., & Robinson, J. R. (1992). Polyanionic polymers in bio and mucoadhesive drug delivery. ACS Symposium series, 480, 269-384.
23. Martin, L., Wilson, C. G., Khoosah, F., & Uchegbu, I. F. (2003). Sustained buccal delivery of the hydrophobic drug denbufylline using physical cross-linked palmitoyl glycol chitosan hydrogels. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 55, 35-45.
24. Park, K., & Park, H. (1990). Test methods for bioadhesion. In Bioadhesive Drug Delivery Systems Lenarts, C. V. and Gurney, R. (Eds.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL., 43, pp. 78-102.
25. Peppas, N. A., & Buri, P. A. (1985). Surface, interfacial and molecular aspects of polymer adhesion on soft tissue. J. Control Release., 2, 257-275.
26. Ponchel, G., Touchard, F., Duchene, D., & Peppas, N. A. (1987). Bioadhesive analysis of controlled release systems, I. Fracture and interpenetration analysis in poly (acrylic acid) containing systems. J. Control. Release., 5, 129-141.
27. Remunan-Lopez, C., Portero, A., Vila-Jato, J. L., & Alonso, M. J. (1998). Design and evaluation of chitosan/ethylcellulose mucoadhesive bilayered devices for buccal drug delivery. J. Control. Release., 55, 143-152.
28. Robert, C., Buri, P., & Peppas, N. A. (1988). Experimental method for the bioadhesive testing of various polymers. Acta Pharm. Technol., 34, 95-98.
29. Rossi, S., Sandri, G., & Caramella, C. M. (2005). Buccal drug delivery: A challenge already won. Drug Discov. Today: Technol., 2, 59-65.
30. Salamat-Miller, N., Chittchang, M., & Johnston, T. P. (2005). The use of mucoadhesive polymers in buccal drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 57, 1666-1691.
31. Smart, J. D. (2005). The basics and underlying mechanisms of mucoadhesion. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 57, 1556-1568.
32. Smart, J. D., Kellaway, I. W., & Worthington, H. E. C. (1984). An in vitro investigation of mucosa-adhesive materials for use in controlled drug delivery. J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 36, 295-299.
33. Takeuchi, H., Thongborisute, J., Matsui, Y., Sugihara, H., Yamamoto, H., & Kawashima, Y. (2005). Novel mucoadhesion tests for polymers and polymer-coated particles to design optimal mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 57, 1583-1594.
34. Tamburic, S., & Craig, D. Q. M. (1997). A comparison of different in vitro methods for measuring mucoadhesive performance. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 44, 159-167.
35. Tobyn, M. J., Johnson, J. R., & Dettmar, P. W. (1995). Factors affecting in vitro gastric mucosa adhesion .I. Test conditions and instrumental parameters. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 41, 235-241.
36. Wong, C. F., Yuen, K. H., Peh, K. K. (1999). An in vitro method for buccal adhesion studies: importance of instrumental variables. Int. J. Pharm., 180, 47-57.
37. Woolfson, A. D., McCafferty, D. F., Goorman, S. P., McCarron, P. A., & Price, J. H. (1992). Design of an apparatus incorporating a linear variable differential transformer for the measurement of type III bioadhesion to cervical tissue. Int. J. Pharm., 84, 69-76.