Integrating personality and intelligence: Typical intellectual engagement and need for cognition

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1635-1639

  Woo, Sang Eun ^a   Harms, Peter D ^a   Kuncel, Nathan R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Measurement; Need for cognition; Typical intellectual engagement

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547191619     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.022     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ackerman P.L., Kanfer R., and Goff M. Cognitive and noncognitive determinants and consequences of complex skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 1 (1995) 270-304
2. Black A.E., and Deci E.L. The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education 84 (2000) 740-756
3. Cacioppo J.T., and Petty R.E. The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42 (1982) 116-131
4. Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E., Feinstein J.A., and Jarvis B.G. Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin 119 2 (1996) 197-253
5. Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E., and Kao C.E. The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment 48 (1984) 306-307
6. Deci E.L., and Ryan R.M. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior (1985), Plenum, New York
7. Evans C.J., Kirby J.R., and Fabrigar L.R. Approaches to learning, need for cognition, and strategic flexibility among university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology 73 (2003) 507-528
8. Goff M., and Ackerman P.L. Personality-intelligence relations: Assessing typical intellectual engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology 84 (1992) 537-552
9. Henning B., and Vorderer P. Psychological escapism: Predicting the amount of television viewing by need for cognition. Journal of Communication 51 (2001) 100-120
10. John O.P. The big five factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In: Pervin L.A. (Ed). Handbook of personality: Theory and research (1990), Guilford Press, New York 66-100
11. John O.P., and Srivastava S. The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In: Pervin L.A., and John O.P. (Eds). Handbook of personality: Theory and research. second ed. (1999), Guilford Press, New York 102-138
12. Paulhus D.L., and Harms P.D. Measuring cognitive ability with the overclaiming technique. Intelligence 32 (2004) 297-314
13. Perse E.M. Predicting attention to local television news: Need for cognition and motives for viewing. Communication Reports 5 1 (1992) 40-49
14. Rocklin T. Relation between typical intellectual engagement and openness: Comment on Goff and Ackerman (1992). Journal of Educational Psychology 86 (1994) 145-149
15. Rolhfus E.L., and Ackerman P.L. Assessing individual differences in knowledge: Knowledge, intelligence, and related traits. Journal of Educational Psychology 91 3 (1999) 511-526
16. Sadowski C.J., and Cogburn H.E. Need for cognition in the big-five factor structure. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied 131 3 (1997) 307-312
17. Sargent M. Less thought, more punishment: Need for cognition predicts support for punitive responses to crime. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30 11 (2004) 1485-1493
18. Shestowsky D., Wegener D.T., and Fabrigar L.R. Need for cognition and interpersonal influence: Individual differences in impact on dyadic decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 5 (1998) 1317-1328