TEOAE amplitude growth, detectability, and response threshold in linear and nonlinear mode and in different time windows

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 46, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 407-418

  Hoth, Sebastian ^a,c   Polzer, Melanie ^a,b   Neumann, Katrin ^b   Plinkert, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Derived nonlinear response; Growth function; Incidence; Latency; Response threshold; TEOAE

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HEARING ACUITY; HUMAN; MALE; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34547189813     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14992020701350224     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. de Boer, E. 1980. Auditory physics. Physical principles in hearing theory. I. Phys Rep, 62, 87-274.
2. Grandori, F. 1985. Nonlinear phenomena in click- and tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions from human ears. Audiology, 24, 71-80.
3. Greenwood, D.D. 1990. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species: 29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am, 87, 2592-605.
4. Hatzopoulos, S., Petrucelli, J., Morlet, T. & Martini, A. 2003. TEOAE recording protocols revised: Data from adult subjects. Int J Audiol, 42, 339-47.
5. Hoth, S. 1996. The influence of inner ear hearing loss on transitory evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Laryngol Rhinol Otol, 75, 709-18.
6. Hoth, S. 2005. The use of distortion product otoacoustic emissions to determine the hearing threshold. Comparison of different procedures. Z Audiol, 44, 120-33.
7. Hoth, S. & Polzer, M. 2006. Quality measures of noisy signals. Response detection in objective audiometry. Z Audiol, 45, 100-110.
8. Hoth, S. & Weber, F.N. 2001. The latency of evoked otoacoustic emissions: Its relation to hearing loss and auditory evoked potentials. Scand Audiol, 30, 173-183.
9. Kemp, D.T., Bray, P., Alexander, L. & Brown, A.M. 1986. Acoustic emission cochleography: Practical aspects. Scand Audiol Suppl, 25, 71-95.
10. Moleti, A. & Sisto, R. 2003. Objective estimates of cochlear tuning by otoacoustic emission analysis. J Acoust Soc Am, 113, 423-9.
11. Moleti, A., Sisto, R. & Lucertini, M. 2002. Linear and nonlinear transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans exposed to noise. Hear Res, 174, 290-5.
12. Neely, S.T., Norton, S.J., Gorga, M.P. & Jesteadt, W. 1988. Latency of auditory brain-stem responses and otoacoustic emissions using tone-burst stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am, 83, 652-6.
13. Nölle, C., Todt, I., Seidl, R.O. & Ernst, A. 2003. Pathophysiological changes of the central auditory pathway after blunt trauma of the head. J Neurotrauma, 21, 251-8.
14. Prieve, B.A., Gorga, M.P., Schmidt, A., Neely, S., Peters, J., et al. 1993. Analysis of transient-evoked emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears. J Acoust Soc Am, 93, 3308-19.
15. Probst, R., Lonsbury-Martin, B.L. & Martin, G.K. 1991. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am, 89, 2027-67.
16. Probst, R. & Harris, F.P. 1997. Otoacoustic emissions. In B.R. Alford, J. Jerger & H.A. Jenkins (eds.) Electrophysiologic evaluation in otolaryngology. Adv Otolaryngol 53. Basel: Karger, pp. 182-204.
17. Ravazzani, P., Tognola, G. & Grandori, F. 1996. 'Derived nonlinear' versus 'linear' click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Audiology, 35, 73-86.
18. Sisto, R., Moleti, A. & Lucertini, M. 2001. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and relaxation dynamics of long decay time OAEs in audiometrically normal and impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am, 109, 638-47.
19. Tavartkiladze, G.A., Frolenkov, G.I., Krublov, A.V. & Artamasov, S.V. 1997. Ipsilateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. In M.S. Robinette & T.J. Glattke (eds.) Otoacoustic emissions: Clinical applications. New York: Thieme, pp. 110-9.
20. Yang, L.P., Young, S.T. & Kuo, T.S. 2003. Combination of derived nonlinear and linear methods to increase the reproducibility of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. Int J Audiol, 42, 331-8.