A simplified approach for vulnerability assessment in moderate-to-low seismic hazard regions: Application to Grenoble (France)

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 467-490

  Guéguen, Philippe ^a,b   Michel, Clotaire ^a   Lecorre, Laele ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ GUSTAVE EIFFEL   (France)

Author keywords

Grenoble; Large scale assessment; Moderate hazard; Quick survey; Seismic risk; Vulnerability assessment; VULNERALP

Indexed keywords

HAZARDS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; RISK ANALYSIS; SURVEYING;

GRENOBLE; LARGE SCALE ASSESSMENT; MODERATE HAZARD; QUICK SURVEY; SEISMIC RISKS; VISUAL SCREENING; VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT;

SEISMIC DESIGN;

BUILDING; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION; SEISMIC HAZARD; SURVEY; URBANIZATION; VULNERABILITY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FRANCE; GRENOBLE; ISERE; RHONE-ALPES; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 34547156245     PISSN: 1570761X     EISSN: 15731456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-007-9036-3     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. AFPS. (1996) Le séisme d'Epagny (Haute-Savoie) du 15 juillet 1996. Rapport de mission. AFPS (Ed.), Paris, 128-22
2. ATC 21 (1988) Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazards: a handbook. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California
3. Benedetti D, Petrini V (1984) On seismic vulnerability of masonry buildings: proposal of an evaluation procedure. L'Industria delle Costruzioni 18:66-78
4. Calvi GM, Magenes G, Bommer JJ, Pinho R, Crowley H, Restrepo-Vélez LF (2006) Displacement-based methods for seismic vulnerability assessment at variable geographical scale. ISET J Earthquake Technol 43(3):75-104
5. Combescure D, Guéguen P, Lebrun B (2005) Vulné rabilité sismique du bâti existant: approche d'ensemble. Cahier technique, AFPS (Ed) 25:121
6. Cornou C, Bard P.-Y, Dietrich M (2003) Contribution of dense array analysis to the identification and quantification of basin-edge induced waves. Part II: application to Grenoble basin (French Alps). Bull Seism Soc Am 93(6):2624-2648
7. D'Ayala D, Spence R, Oliveira C, Pomonis A (1997) Earthquake loss estimation for Europe's historic town centres. Earthquake Spectra 13(4):773-793
8. Dolce M, Masi A, Marino M, Vona M (2003) Earthquake damage scenarios of the building stock of Potenza (Southern Italy) including site effects. Bull Earthquake Eng 1:115-140
9. EMS98 (2001) L'Echelle Macrosismique Européenne 1998. Conseil de l'Europe, Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, volume 19
10. Ergunay O, Gulkan P (1991) Seismic risk reduction and disaster management: national report of Turkey. In: Proceedings of workshop on seismic risk reduction and disaster management, Roma, Italy, November, 1991
11. Faccioli E, Pessina V, Calvi GM, Borzi B (1999) A study on damage scenarios for residential buildings in Catania City. J Seismol. 3(3):327-343
12. Farsi, M. (1996) Identification des structures de génie civil à partir de leurs réponses vibratoires. Vulné rabilité du bâti existant. PhD thesis, University Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, 194 pp
13. FEMA 178 (1997) NEHRP handbook for the seismic evaluation of existing buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency
14. GEMGEP (2005) Le risque sismique à Nice, apport méthodologique, résultats et perspectives opérationnelles. Final report project GEMGEP, 7 April 2005, 52 pp
15. GEMITIS (1999) Evaluation des dommages directs d'un séisme sur la ville de Nice: scénarios de risque. Report BRGM R40612, 171 pp
16. Giovinazzi S, Lagomarsino S (2003) Seismic risk analysis: a method for the vulnerability analysis of built-up areas. In: Proceedings of European safety and reliability conference, ESREL, Maastricht, The Netherlands, June 2003
17. GNDT (1993) Rischio sismico di edifici pubblici -Parte I: aspetti metodologici. Centro Servizi Quasco, Bologna
18. Guéguen P, Cornou C, Garambois S, Banton J (2007) On the limitation of the H/V spectral ratio using seismic noise as an exploration tool: application to the Grenoble valley (France), a small apex ratio basin. Pure Appl Geophys 164(1):115-134
19. Guéguen P, Vassail T (2003) Typologie de l'agglomération grenobloise. Report VULNERALP, 38 pp
20. HAZUS (1997) Earthquake loss estimation, methodology. Hazus technical manuals. National Institute of Building Science, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Washington
21. Jongmans D, Plumier A (2000) Etude Pilote du risque sismique sur une partie de la ville de Liège, rapport interne, Université de Liège, Faculté des sciences appliquées (in French)
22. Lebrun B, Hatzfeld D, Bard P-Y (2001) A site effect study in urban area: experimental results in Grenoble (France). PAGEOPH 158:2543-2557
23. Martin C (1999) Méthodologie d'évaluation du risque sismique aux échelles locale et régionale applicable aux maisons individuelles. Programmes GEMITIS Pointe-à-Pitre et Fort-de-France, contrats de plans Etat-Régions Martinique et Guadeloupe. Report. GTR/BRGM/0188-98
24. MEDD (1982) Le risque sismique. Délégation aux risques majeurs, 1982
25. Milutinovic ZV, Trendafiloski GS (2003) WP4-Vulnerability of current buildings, RISK-UE project, 110 pp
26. Oliveira CS (2003) Seismic vulnerability of historical constructions: a contribution. Bull Earthquake Eng 1(1):37-82
27. Onur T, Ventura CE, Liam Finn WD (2005) Regional seismic risk in British Columbia - damage and loss distribution in Victoria and Vancouver. Can J Civ Eng 32:361-371
28. Otani S (2000) Seismic vulnerability assessment methods for buildings in Japan. Earthquake Eng & Eng Seismol 2(2):47-56
29. Parent J-F (1982) Grenoble, deux siècles d'urbanisme. Presse Universitaire de Grenoble, 187 pp
30. Pierre J-P, Montagne M (2004) The 20 April 2002, Mw 5.0 Au Sable Forks, New York, earthquake : a supplementary source of knowledge on earthquake damage to lifelines and buildings in Eastern North America. Seismol Res Lett 75(5):626-635
31. RiskUE (2003) An advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different european, towns, Projet Européen, EVK4-CT-2000-00014
32. Roca A, Goula X, Susagna T, Chávez J, González M, Reinoso E (2006) A simplified method for vulerability assessment of dwelling buildings and estimation of the damage scenarios in Catalonia (Spain). Bull Earthquake Eng 4(2):141-158
33. Saito K, Spence R, Going C, Markus M (2004) Using high-resolution satellite images for post-earthquakes building damage assessment: a study following the 26 January 2001 Gujarat earthquake. Earthquake Spectra 20(1):145-169
34. Schweier C, Markus A, Steinle E (2004) Simulation of earthquake caused building damages for the development of fast reconnaissance techniques. Nat. Hazard Earth Syst. Sci. 4:285-293
35. Seismocare (1998) Seismocare Computed Aided Reduction of Seismic Risk with application to existing cities, town planning and construction - Directions to fill in the vulnerability form GNDT levels 1 and 2. European project Environment and Climate, 1994-1998, ENV4-CT97-0588
36. Spence R, Bommer J, Del Re D, Bird J, Aydinoglu N, Tabuchi S (2003) Comparing loss estimation with observed damage: a study of the 1999 Kocaeli earthquake in Turquey. Bull Earthquake Eng 1(1):83-113
37. Spence R, Lebrun B (ed) (2006) Earthquake scenarios for European cities - the risk-UE project. Bull Earthquake Eng 4(4): special issue.
38. Steimen S, Faeh D, Giardini D, Bertogg M, Tschudi S (2004) Reliability of building inventories in seismic prone regions. Bull. of Earthquake Engi. 2(3):361-388
39. Thouvenot F, Fréchet J, Jenatton J, Gamond JF (2003) The Belledonne border fault: indetification of an active seimic strike-slip fault in the western Alps. Geophys J Int 155:174-192
40. Ventura CE, Liam Finn WD, Onur T, Blanquera A, Rezai M (2005) Regional seismic risk in British Columbia - classification of buildings and development of damage probability functions. Can J Civ Eng 32:372-387
41. VULNERALP (2004) Projet d'évaluation de la vulné rabilité sismique à Grenoble. http://www-lgit.obs.ujf-grenoble.fr/ ~pgueg/VULNERALP)