Ethics of guidelines for reviewers of medical manuscripts

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 391-393

  Minion, David ^a   Sorial, Ehab ^a   Endean, Eric ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL STUDY; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; EDITOR; EDITORIAL; ETHICS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PATENT; PEER REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VASCULAR SURGERY;

CONFIDENTIALITY; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; EDITORIAL POLICIES; ETHICS, PROFESSIONAL; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; GUIDELINES; HUMANS; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; MANUSCRIPTS, MEDICAL; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT;

EID: 34547133048     PISSN: 07415214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.05.024     Document Type: Editorial

References (9)

1. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Guidelines on good publication practice. Available at: www.publicationethics.org.uk/guidelines. Accessed Jan 15, 2007.
2. Council of Science Editors. CSE's white paper on promoting integrity in scientific journal publications. Available at: www.councilscienceeditors.org/editorial_policies/whitepaper/2-3_reviewer.cfm#2.3.2. Accessed Jan 25, 2007.
3. Young S.N. Peer review of manuscripts: theory and practice. J Psychiatry Neurosci 28 (2003) 327-330
4. Evans A.T., McNutt R.A., Fletcher S.W., and Fletcher R.H. The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews. J Gen Int Med 8 (1993) 422-428
5. Black N., van Rooyen S., Godlee F., Smith R., and Evans S. What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal?. JAMA 280 (1998) 231-233
6. Liesegang T.J., Albert D.M., Schachat A.P., and Minckler D.S. The editorial process for medical journals: I. Introduction of a series and discussion of the responsibilities of editors, authors, and reviewers. Am J Ophthy 136 (2003) 109-113
7. Bad peer reviewers. Anonymous. Nature 413 (2001) 93
8. Dalton R. Peers under pressure. Nature 413 (2001) 102-104
9. Kempters R.D. Ethical issues in biomedical publications. Fertil Steril 77 (2002) 883-888