Pulp-dissolving ability of several endodontic irrigants: A spectrophotometry evaluation

International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 381-386

  D'Arcangelo, Camillo ^a   Di Nardo Di Maio, F ^a   Stracci, N ^a   Spoto, G ^a   Malagnino, V A ^a   Caputi, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Dental pulp; EDTA; Irrigation; Sodium hypochlorite

Indexed keywords

EDETIC ACID; HYPOCHLORITE SODIUM;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COW; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOLUBILITY; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; TOOTH PULP;

EID: 34547127608     PISSN: 03946320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/039463200702000219     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Buck R.A., P.D. Eleazer, R.H. Staat and J.P. Scheetz. 2001. Effectiveness of three endodontic irrigants at vaRHrious tubular depths in human dentin. J. Endod. 27:206.
2. Evans G.E., P.M. Speight and K. Gulabivala. 2001. The influence of preparation technique and sodium hypochlorite on removal of pulp and predentine from root canals of posterior teeth. Int. Endod. J. 34:322.
3. Pashley E.L., N.L. Birdsong, K. Bowman and D.H. Pashley. 1985. Cytotoxic effects of NaOCl on vital tissue. J. Endod. 11:525.
4. D'Arcangelo C., G. Varvara and P. De Fazio. 1999. An evaluation of the action of different root canal irrigants on facultative aerobic-anaerobic, obligatanaerobic, and microaerophilic bacteria. J. Endod. 25:5.
5. Seal G.J., Y.L. Ng, D. Spratt, M. Bhatti and E.K. Gulabivala. 2001. An in vitro comparison of the bactericidal efficacy of lethal photosensitization or sodium hypochlorite irrigation on streptococcus intermedius biofilms in root canals. Int. Endod. J. 35:268.
6. Serper A., S. Calt, A.L. Dogan, D. Guc, B. Ozcelik and T. Kuraner. 2001. Comparison of the cytotoxic effects and smear layer removing capacity of oxidative potential water, NaOCl and EDTA. J. of Oral Science 43:233.
7. Siqueira Junior J.F., I.N. Rocas, A. Favieri and K.C. Lima. 2000. Chemomechanical reduction of the bacterial population in the root canal after instrumentation and irrigation with 1%, 2.5% and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. J. Endod. 26:331.
8. Tang H.M., H. Nordbo and L.K. Bakland. 2000. Pulpal response to prolonged dentinal exposure to sodium hypochlorite. Int. Endod. J. 33:505.
9. Spano J.C.E., E.L. Barbin, T.C. Santos, L.F. Guimaraes and J.D. Pecora. 2001. Solvent action of sodium hypochlorite on bovine pulp and physicchemical properties of resulting liquid. Braz. Dent. J. 12:154.
10. Guerisoli D.M., M.A. Marchesan, A.D. Walmsley, P.J. Lumley and J.D. Pecora. 2001. Evaluation of smear layer removal by Edtac and sodium hypochlorite with ultrasonic agitation. Int. Endod. J. 35:418.
11. Scelza M.F.Z., J.H. Antoniazzi and P. Scelza. 2000. Efficacy of final irrigation-a scanning electron microscopic evaluation. J. Endod. 26:355.
12. Hand R.E., M.L. Smith and J.W. Harrison. 1978. Analysis of the effect of dilution on the necrotic tissue dissolution property of sodium hypochlorite. J. Endod. 4:60.
13. Baumgartner J.C. and P.R. Cuenin. 1992. Efficacy of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite for root canal irrigation. J. Endod. 18:605.
14. Koskinen K.P., H. Stenvall and V.J. Uitto. 1980. Dissolution of bovine pulp tissue by endodontic solutions Scand. J. Dent. Res. 88:406.