The consequences of temporary deferral on future whole blood donation

Transfusion

Volumn 47, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1514-1523

  Custer, Brian ^a   Chinn, Artina ^b   Hirschler, Nora V ^b   Busch, Michael P ^b   Murphy, Edward L ^b  

^a BLOOD SYSTEMS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; BLOOD; BLOOD BANK; BLOOD DONOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; RACE DIFFERENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEX RATIO; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD DONORS; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34547095231     PISSN: 00411132     EISSN: 15372995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01292.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Munsterman KA, Grindon AJ, Sullivan MT, et al. Assessment of motivations for return donation among deferred blood donors. American Red Cross ARCNET Study Group. Transfusion 1998 38 : 45 50.
2. Germain M, Goldman M. Blood donor selection and screening: strategies to reduce recipient risk. Am J Ther 2002 9 : 406 10.
3. Halperin D, Baetens J, Newman B. The effect of short-term, temporary deferral on future blood donation. Transfusion 1998 38 : 181 3.
4. Lawson-Ayayi S, Salmi LR. Epidemiology of blood collection in France. Eur J Epidemiol 1999 15 : 285 92.
5. Newman B. Blood donor suitability and allogeneic whole blood donation. Transfus Med 2001 15 : 234 44.
6. Linden JV, Gregorio DI, Kalish RI. An estimate of blood donor eligibility in the general population. Vox Sang 1988 54 : 96 100.
7. Zou S, Fujii K, Johnson S, et al. Prevalence of selected viral infections among blood donors deferred for potential risk to blood safety. Transfusion 2006 46 : 1997 2003.
8. Zou S, Musavi F, Notari EP, Fujii KE, Dodd RY. Prevalence of selected viral infections among temporarily deferred donors who returned to donate blood: American Red Cross blood donor study. Transfusion 2005 45 : 1593 600.
9. Custer B, Johnson ES, Sullivan SD, et al. Quantifying losses to the donated blood supply due to donor deferral and miscollection. Transfusion 2004 44 : 1417 26.
10. James RC, Matthews DE. The donation cycle: a framework for the measurement and analysis of blood donor return behaviour. Vox Sang 1993 64 : 37 42.
11. James RC, Matthews DE. Analysis of blood donor return behaviour using survival regression methods. Transfus Med 1996 6 : 21 30.
12. Zuck TF, Thomson RA, Schreiber GB, et al. The Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study (REDS): rationale and methods. Transfusion 1995 35 : 944 51.
13. van Belle G, Fisher LD, Heagerty PJ, Lumley TS. Analysis of the time to an event: survival analysis. In : Biostatistics: a methodology for the health sciences. 2nd ed. Hoboken (NJ) : Wiley 2004. p. 6 61 708.
14. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B 1972 34 : 187 220.
15. Gillespie TW, Hillyer CD. Blood donors and factors impacting the blood donation decision. Transfus Med 2002 16 : 115 30.
16. Ibrahim NA, Mobley MF. Recruitment and retention of blood donors: a strategic linkage approach. Health Care Manage Rev 1993 18 : 67 73.
17. Jones RL. The blood supply chain, from donor to patient: a call for greater understanding leading to more effective strategies for managing the blood supply. Transfusion 2003 43 : 132 4.
18. Piliavin JA. Temporary deferral and donor return. Transfusion 1987 27 : 199 200.
19. Ownby HE, Kong F, Watanabe K, Tu Y, Nass CC. Analysis of donor return behavior. Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study. Transfusion 1999 39 : 1128 35.
20. Domen RE, Grewal ID, Hirschler NV, Hoeltge GA. An evaluation of the need for shared blood donor deferral registries. Int J Qual Health Care 1997 9 : 35 41.