|
Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2006, Pages
|
Demonstrating the benefit of medical emergency teams (MET) proves more difficult than anticipated
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
AUSTRALIA;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE;
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES EDUCATION;
EMERGENCY TREATMENT;
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE;
HEALTH CARE QUALITY;
HEALTH PROGRAM;
HEART ARREST;
HOSPITAL ADMISSION;
HUMAN;
INTENSIVE CARE UNIT;
MEDICAL STAFF;
MORTALITY;
NURSING STAFF;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
SHORT SURVEY;
METHODOLOGY;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
REVIEW;
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES;
EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL;
HUMANS;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
|
EID: 34447643246
PISSN: 13648535
EISSN: 1466609X
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1186/cc4865 Document Type: Short Survey |
Times cited : (9)
|
References (6)
|