Milk intake and carbon dioxide production of piglets determined with the doubly labelled water technique

Animal

Volumn 1, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 881-888

  Theil, P K ^a   Kristensen, N B ^a   Jorgensen H ^a   Labouriau, R ^a   Jakobsen, K ^a  

^a DANISH INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Doubly labelled water; Energy metabolism; Heat production; Milk intake; Sucking piglets

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; OXYGEN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BODY WATER; BODY WEIGHT; BREATH ANALYSIS; BREATHING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DILUTION; DOUBLY LABELED WATER TECHNIQUE; EXPIRED AIR; FEEDING; FOOD INTAKE; MILK; NONHUMAN; PIGLET; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REARING; SERUM;

EID: 34447628845     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731107000031     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aguilera JF and Prieto C 1986. Description and function of an open-circuit respiration plant for pigs and small ruminants and the techniques used to measure energy metabolism. Archives of Animal Nutrition 36, 1009-1018.
2. Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990. Official methods of analysis, 15th edition.AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.
3. Beutler HO 1984. Lactose and D-galactose. In Methods of enzymatic analysis (ed. HU Bergmeyer and M Grassl), pp.104-112. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim.
4. Coward WA, Cole TJ, Gerber H, Roberts SB and Fleet I 1982. Water turnover and the measurement of milk intake. Pflugers Archive 393, 344-347.
5. Danielsen V 1988. Nye energinormer til søer [New recommendations of energy supply to sows]. Hyologisk tidsskrift 8, 27-28.
6. Darragh AJ and Moughan PJ 1998. The composition of colostrum and milk. In The lactating sow (ed. MWA Verstegen, PJ Moughan and JW Schrama) pp. 3-21. Wageningen Pers, Wageningen.
7. Devillers N, van Milgen J, Prunier A and Dividich J 2004. Estimation of colostrum intake in the neonatal pig. Animal Science 78, 305-313.
8. Fink R, Tauson AH, Chwalibog A, Kristensen NB and Wamberg S 2003. Effects of low protein supply on energy metabolism and milk production of the mink (Mustela vison). In Progress in research on energy and protein metabolism (ed. WB Souffrant and CC Metges), pp. 163-166. Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, Wageningen.
9. Haggarty P, Franklin MF, Fuller MF, McGaw BA, Milne E, Duncan G, Christie SL and Smith JS 1994. Validation of the doubly labeled water method in growing pigs. The American Journal of Physiology 267, R1574-R1588.
10. Jakobsen K, Theil PK and Jørgensen H 2005. Methodological considerations as to quantify nutrient and energy metabolism in lactating sows. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 14, 31-47.
11. 18O) method: appropriate applications of the individual or combined techniques. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 47, 219-225.
12. Jørgensen H, Zhao XQ and Eggum BO 1996. The influence of dietary fibre and environmental temperature on the development of the gastrointestinal tract, digestibility, degree of fermentation in the hind-gut and energy metabolism in pigs. The British Journal of Nutrition 75, 365-378.
13. Lifson N and McClintock R 1966. Theory of use of the turnover rates of body water for measuring energy and material balance. Journal of Theoretical Biology 12, 46-74.
14. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW and Wolfinger RD 1996. SAS (R) System for mixed models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
15. Noblet J and Etienne M 1987. Body composition, metabolic rate and utilization of milk nutrients in suckling piglets. Reproduction, Nutrition, Development 27, 829-839.
16. Pettigrew JE, Sower AF, Cornelius SG and Moser RL 1985. A comparison of isotope dilution and weigh-suckle-weigh methods for estimating milk intake by pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 65, 989-992.
17. Pluske JR, Fenton TW, Lorschy ML, Pettigrew JE, Sower AF and Aherne FX 1997. A modification to the isotope-dilution technique for estimating milk intake of pigs using pig serum. Journal of Animal Science 75, 1279-1283.
18. Prawirodigdo S, King RH, Dunkin AC and Dove H 1990. Evaluation of techniques for estimating milk production by sows 1. Deuterium oxide dilution method for estimating milk intake by piglets. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 3, 135-141.
19. Ritz P, Johnson PG and Coward WA 1994. Measurements of H-2 and O-18 in body water: analytical considerations and physiological implications. The British Journal of Nutrition 72, 3-12.
20. Rudolph BC, Stahly TS and Cromwell GL 1988. Estimation of body composition of neonatal pigs via deuterium oxide dilution: validation of technique. Journal of Animal Science 66, 53-61.
21. Speakman JR 1997. Doubly labelled water. Theory and practice. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.
22. Stoldt W 1952. Vorslag zur Vereinheitlichung der Fettbestimmung in Lebensmitteln. Fette und Seifen 54, 206-207.
23. Theil PK, Nielsen TT, Kristensen NB, Labouriau R, Danielsen V, Lauridsen C and Jakobsen K 2002. Estimation of milk production in lactating sows by determination of deuterated water turnover in three piglets per litter. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A 52, 221-232.
24. Theil PK, Jørgensen H and Jakobsen K 2004. Energy and protein metabolism in lactating sows fed two levels of dietary fat. Livestock Production Science 89, 265-276.
25. Verstegen MWA, Mesu J, Van Kempen G and Geerse C 1985. Energy balances of lactating sows in relation to feeding level and stage of lactation. Journal of Animal Science 60, 731-740.
26. Wolter BF, Ellis M, Corrigan BP and DeDecker JM 2002. The effect of birth weight and feeding of supplemental milk replacer to piglets during lactation on preweaning and postweaning growth performance and carcass characteristics. Journal of Animal Science 80, 301-308.