Development and validation of the Diabetes Obstacles Questionnaire (DOQ) to assess obstacles in living with Type 2 diabetes

Diabetic Medicine

Volumn 24, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 878-882

  Hearnshaw, H ^a   Wright, K ^a   Dale, J ^a   Sturt, J ^a   Vermeire, E ^b   Van Royen, P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Adherence; Questionnaire; Type 2 diabetes; Validity

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; HEMOGLOBIN A1C;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; COPING BEHAVIOR; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CRITERION RELATED VALIDITY; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT; KNOWLEDGE; LIFESTYLE MODIFICATION; LITERATURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; RESEARCH; SELF CARE; SELF MONITORING; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; UNITED KINGDOM; VALIDATION STUDY;

DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 34447622299     PISSN: 07423071     EISSN: 14645491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02137.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Schectman J, Nadkarni M, Voss J. The association between diabetes metabolic control and drug adherence in an indigent population. Diabetes Care 2002 25 : 1015 1021.
2. Bradley C. Importance of differentiating health status from quality of life. Lancet 2001 357 : 7 8.
3. NICE. Diabetes - Type Update, 2002. London : National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2002.
4. Hearnshaw H, Lindenmeyer A. What do we mean by adherence to treatment and advice for living with diabetes? A review of the literature on definitions and measurements. Diabet Med 2005 23 : 720 728.
5. Vermeire E, Hearnshaw HM, Ratsep A, Levasseur G, Petek D, van Dam H et al. Obstacles to adherence in living with Type 2 diabetes. An international qualitative study using meta-ethnography (EUROBSTACLE). Primary Care Diabetes 2007 1 : 25 33.
6. Bradley C. (ed.) Handbook of Psychology and Diabetes. East Sussex : Psychology Press, 1994.
7. Vermeire E, Hearnshaw H, Van Royen P, Denekens J. Patient adherence to treatment: three decades of research. A comprehensive review. J Clin Pharm Ther 2001 26 : 331 342.
8. Kinmonth A, Spiegal N, Woodcock A. Developing a training programme in patient-centred consulting for evaluation in a randomised controlled trial; diabetes care from diagnosis in British primary care. Patient Educ Couns 1996 29 : 75 86.
9. Rubin RR, Peyrot M. Psychological issues and treatments for people with diabetes. J Clin Psychol 2001 57 : 457 478.
10. Heisler M, Bouknight RR, Hayward RA, Smith DM, Kerr EA. The relative importance of physician communication, participatory decision making, and patient understanding in diabetes self-management. J Gen Intern Med 2002 17 : 243 252.
11. Piette JD, Schrillinger D, Potter MB, Heisler M. Dimensions of patient-provider communication and diabetes self-care in an ethnically diverse population. J Gen Intern Med 2003 18 : 625 632.
12. Diabetes UK Homepage. http://www.diabetes.org.uk.
13. Warwick Diabetes Care Research User Group. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/ med/healthcom/diabetes/usergroup/ (accessed February 2005).
14. Welch G, Jacobson AM, Polonsky WH. The Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale. An evaluation of its utility. Diabetes Care 1997 20 : 760 766.
15. Bradley C, Todd C, Gorton T, Symonds E, Martin A, Plowright R. The development of an individualised questionnaire measure of perceived impact of diabetes on quality of life: the ADDQoL. Quality Life Res 1999 8 : 79 91.
16. Warwick Diabetes Care Research Framework. GP practices recruited. Available from: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/med/healthcom/diabetes/research/ framework/ (accessed February 2005).