Mixed signals: Stimulus-response compatibility and car indicator light configuration

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 669-676

  Bayliss, Andrew P ^a  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SIGNAL DETECTION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; TRAFFIC SAFETY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

EID: 34447568466     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1342     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Ansorge, U. (2003). Spatial Simon effects and compatibility effects induced by observed gaze direction. Visual Cognition, 10, 363-383.
2. Hommel, B., & Lippa, Y. (1995). S-R compatibility effects due to context-dependent spatial stimulus coding. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 370-374.
3. Kingstone, A., Smilek, D., Ristic, J., Friesen, C. K., & Eastwood, J. D. (2003). Attention, researchers! It is time to take a look at the real world. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 176-180.
4. Lamberts, K., Tavernier, G., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1992). Effects of multiple reference points in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Acta Psychologica, 79, 115-130.
5. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subjects designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
6. Ricciardelli, P., Ro, T., & Driver, J. (2002). A left visual field advantage in perception of gaze direction. Neuropsychologia, 40, 769-777.
7. Umilta, C., & Liotti, M. (1987). Egocentric and relative spatial codes in s-r compatibility. Psychological Research, 49, 81-90.