Steerable antegrade stenting: A new trick of the trade

International Braz J Urol

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 389-394

  Nagele, Udo ^a   Anastasiadis, Aristotelis G ^a   Amend, Bastian ^a   Schilling, David ^a   Kuczyk, Markus ^a   Stenzl, Arnulf ^a   Sievert, Karl Dietrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Kidney; Nephrostomy; Stent; Ureter

Indexed keywords

EID: 34447567319     PISSN: 16775538     EISSN: 16776119     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1677-55382007000300013     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Macri A, Magno C, Certo A, Basile A, Scuderi G, Crescenti F, et al.: Combined antegrade and retrograde ureteral stenting: the rendezvous technique. Clin Radiol. 2005; 60:257-60.
2. Watson GM, Patel U: Primary antegrade ureteric stenting: prospective experience and cost-effectiveness analysis in 50 ureters. Clin Radiol. 2001; 56: 568-74.
3. Grasso M, Nord R, Bagley DH: Prone split leg and flank roll positioning: simultaneous antegrade and retrograde access to the upper urinary tract. J Endourol. 1993;7:307-10.
4. Patel U, Abubacker MZ: Ureteral stent placement without postprocedural nephrostomy tube: experience in 41 patients. Radiology. 2004; 230: 435-42.
5. Wirth B, Loch T, Papadopoulos I, Schmidt S: Ureteral stenting using a combined antegrade/retrograde procedure. A technique for difficult cases. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1997; 31: 35-7.
6. Nagele U, Schilling D, Kuczyk M, Anastasiadis A, Stenzl A, Sievert K: The use of Floseal® to close the track of the Mini-PCNL shortens the hospital stay. Eur Urol. (suppl) 2005, Abstract 779.