Contextualizing counterintuitiveness: How context affects comprehension and memorability of counterintuitive concepts

Cognitive Science

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 415-439

  Upal, M Afzal ^a   Gonce, Lauren O ^b   Tweney, Ryan D ^b   Slone, D Jason ^c  

^a OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WEBSTER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Concepts; Culture; Language understanding; Memory; Religion

Indexed keywords

EID: 34447565169     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15326900701326568     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Alchourron, C. E., Gardenfors, P., & Makinson, D. (1985). On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 50, 510-530.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Atran, S. (2002). In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion, Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
4. Atran, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2004). Religion's evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(6), 713-770.
5. Barrett, J. L. (1997). Anthropomorphism, intentional agents, and conceptualizing God, PhD Dissertation, Cornell University.
6. Barrett, J. L., & Nyhof, M. (2001). Spreading non-natural concepts: the role of intuitive conceptual structures in memory and transmission of cultural materials. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 1, 69-100.
7. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
8. Boyer, P. (1994). The Naturalness of Religious Ideas: A Cognitive Theory of Religion, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
9. Boyer, P., & Ramble, C. (2001). Cognitive templates for religious concepts. Cognitive Science, 25, 535-564.
10. Brooks, R. A. (1991), Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139-159.
11. Dennett, D. C. (2006). Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. New York: Viking.
12. Erdoes, R., & Oritz, A. (1984). American Indian myths and legends. New York: Pantheon Books.
13. Franks, B. (2003). The nature of unnaturalness in religious representations: Negation and concept combination. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 3(1), 41-68.
14. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P., & The ABC Group (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Gonce, L., Upal, M., Slone, J., & Tweney, R. (2006). The role of context in the recall of counterintuitive concepts. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 6(3-4), 521-547.
16. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-395.
17. Heit, E. (1998). Influences of prior knowledge on selective weighting of category members. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 712-731.
18. Kintsch, W. (1980). Learning from text, levels of comprehension, or: Why would anyone read a story anyway. Poetics, 9, 89-98.
19. Kolodner, J. (1993). Case-based reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
20. Magnani, L. (2001). Abduction, reason, and science: Processes of discovery and explanation. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
21. McDaniel, M. A., Dornburg, C. C., & Guynn, M. J. (2005). Disentangling encoding versus retrieval explanations of the bizarreness effect: Implications for distinctiveness. Memory & Cognition, 33, 270-279.
22. McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., DeLosh, E. L., & May, C. P. (1995). The bizarreness effect: it's not surprising, it's complex. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 422-435.
23. McKoon, G., & Ratcliffe, R. (1992). Spreading activation versus compound cue accounts of priming: Mediated priming revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1155-1172.
24. Newell, A., & Simon, H. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
25. Ng, H., & Mooney, R. (1990). On the role of coherence in abductive explanation. In T. Dietterich & W. Swartout (Eds.). Proceedings of the 8th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (pp. 337-342). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
26. Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1998). Rational models of cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. O'Reilly, T., Symons, S., & MacLatchy-Gaudet, H. (1998). A comparison of self-explanation and elaborative interrogation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 434-445.
28. Ram, A. (1987). AQUA: Asking questions and understanding answers. In K. Forbus & H. Shrobe (Eds.). Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (pp. 312-316). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
29. Redmond, M. (1992) Learning by observing and explaining expert problem solving. PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA. Available as Georgia Tech, Technical report # GIT-CC-92/43.
30. Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Schank, R. C. (1979). Interestingness: Controlling inferences. Artificial Intelligence, 12, 273-297.
32. Schank, R. C. (1981). Failure-driven memory Cognition and Brain Theory, 4, 41-60.
33. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Shennan, S. (2002). Genes, memes, and human history: Darwinian archeology and cultural evolution. London: Thames & Hudson.
35. Smith, E., & Hancox, P. (2001). Representation, coherence, and inference. Artificial Intelligence Review, 15, 295-323.
36. Sperber, D. 1996. Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
37. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. (2nd Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
38. Tweney, R. D. (2006). Discovering discovery: How Faraday found the first metallic colloid. Perspectives on Science, 14, 97-121.
39. Tweney, R. D., Upal, M. A., Gonce, L., Slone, D. J., & Edwards, K. (2006). The creative structuring of counterintuitive worlds. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 6, 483-498.
40. Upal, M. A. (2005). Role of context in memorability of intuitive and counterintuitive concepts. In B. Bara, L. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.). Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2224-2229). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. Van der Henst, J.-B., & Sperber, D. (2004). Testing the cognitive and communicative principles of relevance. In I. A. Noveck & D. Sperber (Eds.). Experimental pragmatics (pp. 141-171). Basingstoke, Hampshire, England: Palgrave.
42. Waddill, P., & McDaniel, M. (1998). Distinctiveness effects in recall: differential processing or privileged retrieval. Memory and Cognition, 26, 108-120.
43. Whitehouse, H. (2004). Modes of religiosity: A cognitive theory of religious transmission. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
44. Worthen, J. B., & Roark, B. (2002). Free recall accuracy for common and bizarre verbal information. American Journal of Psychology, 115, 377-394.