Conceptual versus perceptual training for auditory graphs

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1598-1601

  Walker, Bruce N ^a   Nees, Michael A ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; FEEDBACK; GRAPH THEORY; INVENTORY CONTROL; PERSONNEL TRAINING;

AUDITORY GRAPHS; QUANTITATIVE DATA; SONIFIED GRAPH; STOCK PRICE;

BIOELECTRIC POTENTIALS;

EID: 34447563180     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/154193120504901721     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Ahissar, M. (2001). Perceptual training: A tool for both modifying the brain and exploring it. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(21), 11842-11843.
2. Aiken, E. G., & Lau, A. W. (1967). Response prompting and response confirmation: A review of recent literature. Psychological Bulletin, 68(5), 330-341.
3. Annett, J. (1966). Training for perceptual skills. Ergonomics, 9(6), 459-468.
4. Annett, J., & Patterson, L. (1967). Training for auditory detection. Acta Psychologica, 27, 420-426.
5. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.
6. Kramer, G., Walker, B. N., Bonebright, T., Cook, P., Flowers, J., Miner, N., et al. (1999). The Sonification Report: Status of the Field and Research Agenda. Report prepared for the National Science Foundation by members of the International Community for Auditory Display. Santa Fe, NM: International Community for Auditory Display (ICAD).
7. Prather, D. C., Berry, G. A., & Bermudez, J. M. (1972). The effect of prompting and feedback on performance during learning, stress, and transfer of a perceptual skill. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 7(2), 643-644.
8. Sidley, N. A., Winograd, E., & Bedarf, E. W. (1965). Learning to identify complex sounds: Prompting versus confirmation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 38, 1050-1052.
9. Smith, D. R., & Walker, B. N. (2002). Tick-marks, axes, and labels: The effects of adding context to auditory graphs. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Auditory Display (pp. 362-367), Kyoto, Japan.
10. Smith, D. R., & Walker, B. N. (2004). Effects of training and auditory context on performance of a point estimation sonification task. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (HFES2004) (pp. 1828-1831), New Orleans, LA.
11. Smith, D. R., & Walker, B. N. (in press). Effects of auditory context cues and training on performance of a point estimation sonification task. Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology.
12. Swets, J. A., Millman, S. H., Fletcher, W. E., & Green, D. M. (1962). Learning to identify nonverbal sounds: An application of a computer as a teaching machine. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 37(7), 928-935.