Effects of bottle closure type on consumer perceptions of wine quality

American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 182-191

  Marin, Anna B ^a   Jorgensen, Emily M ^b   Kennedy, James A ^a   Ferrier, Jordan ^c  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Wrigley Company   (United States)

^c Hogue Cellars   (United States)

Author keywords

Closures; Consumer; Sensory; Wine quality

Indexed keywords

EID: 34447561603     PISSN: 00029254     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bleibaum, R.N., K.A. Lattey, and I.L. Francis. 2005. Conjoint research for consumer perception of wine closure options and their impact on purchase interest in the United States and Australia. Presented at 6th Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium, Harrogate, UK (http://www.tragon.com/articles/ 2005PangbornWineClosures.pdf).
2. Cartiere, R. 2004. Poll: Wine drinkers conflicted over screwcaps, alternative closures. Wine Market Report. 51 (July):1-2.
3. Chatonnet, P., S. Bonnet, S. Boutou, and M.D. Labadie. 2004. Identification and responsibility of 2,4,6-tribromoanisole in musty, corked odors in wine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52:1255-1262.
4. Colonna, A.E., D.O. Adams, and A.C. Noble. 2004. Comparison of procedures for reducing astringency carry-over effects in evaluation of red wines. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 10:26-31.
5. Deliza, R., and H. MacFie. 1996. The generation of expectation by external cues and its effects on sensory perception and hedonics ratings: A review. J. Sens. Stud. 11:103-128.
6. Francis, L., J. Field, M. Gishen, A. Coulter, P. Valente, K. Lattey, P. Hoj, E. Robinson, and P. Godden. 2003. The AWRI closure trial: Sensory evaluation data 36 months after bottling. Aust. N.Z. Grapegr. Winemaker 475:59-64.
7. Godden, P.W., L. Francis, J. Field, M. Gishen, A.D. Coulter, P. Valente, P. Hoj, and E. Robinson. 2001. Wine bottle closures: Physical characteristics and effect on composition and sensory properties of a Semillon wine. 1. Performance up to 20 months post-bottling. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 7:64-105.
8. Jackson, R.S. 1994. Wine Science: Principles and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego.
9. Joncheray, J.P. 1976. L'épave grecque, or etrusque, de Bon-Ponté. Cah. Archaeol. Subaquatique 5:5-36.
10. Lange, C., S. Isanchou, and P. Combris, P. 2000. Expected versus experienced quality: Trade-off with price. Food Qual. Pref. 11:289-297.
11. Lawless, H.T., and H. Heymann. 1999. Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices. Aspen Publishers, Gaithersburg, MD.
12. Oliveira, M.A. 1994. The Cork. Tilgrafica, SA, Portugal.
13. th Ann. Meet. Abst. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 51:306-307.
14. O'Mahony, M. 1986. Sensory Evaluation of Food. Marcel Dekker, New York.
15. Tchernia, A. 1986. Le Vin de l'Italie Romaine: Essai d'Histoire Economique d'après les Amphores. Ecole Française de Rome, Rome.
16. Tuorila, H.M., H.L. Meiselman, A.V. Cardello, and L.L. Lesher. 1998. Effect of expectations and the definition of product category on the acceptance of unfamiliar foods. Food Qual. Pref. 9:421-430.
17. Schlich, P. 1993. Risk tables for discrimination tests. Food Qual. Pref. 4:141-151.
18. Stelzer, T. 2003. Screwed for good? The case for screwcaps on red wines. Wine Press, Brisbane, Australia.