Development and validation of Patient Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure (PRISM)

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 363-372

  Cook, Karon F ^a,b,c,g   Teal, Cayla R ^a,d,e   Engebretson, Joan C ^f   Hart, Karen A ^e   Mahoney, Jane S ^f   Robinson Whelen, Susan ^e   Sherwood, Arthur M ^e  

^a DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c EVANSTON NORTHWESTERN HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^d MICHAEL E DEBAKEY VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON   (United States)

^g NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Abnormal muscle control; Factor analysis; Involuntary muscle movement; Motor control; Outcome assessment; Psychometrics; Quality of life; Rehabilitation; Spasticity; Spinal cord injury

Indexed keywords

INVOLUNTARY MUSCLE MOVEMENT; MUSCLE CONTROL; PSYCHOMETRICS; SPINAL CORD INJURY;

BIOMECHANICS; BIOMEDICAL EQUIPMENT; MEDICAL PROBLEMS; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; PATIENT TREATMENT;

PATIENT MONITORING;

ADULT; AGITATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTENT VALIDITY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT REPORTED IMPACT OF SPASTICITY MEASURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE INDEX; SCORING SYSTEM; SOCIAL AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; SPASTICITY; SPINAL CORD INJURY; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VETERAN;

AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE SPASTICITY; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPINAL CORD INJURIES;

EID: 34447546903     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 07487711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2006.04.0036     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Rintala DH, Hart KA, Priebe MM, Ballinger DA, Davis CL. Future directions for spinal cord injury research: Consumer involvement in setting research priorities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(10):1343.
2. Priebe MM, Sherwood AM, Graves DE, Mueller M, Olson WH. Effectiveness of gabapentin in controlling spasticity: A quantitative study. Spinal Cord. 1997;35(3):171-75.
3. Priebe MM, Sherwood AM, Thornby JI, Kharas NF, Markowski J. Clinical assessment of spasticity in spinal cord injury: A multidimensional problem. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(7):713-16.
4. Fontana A, Frey JH. The interview: From neutral stance to political involvement. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2005. p. 695-727.
5. Holstein JA, Gubrium JF. The active interview. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1995.
6. Mahoney JS, Engebretson JC, Cook KF, Hart KA, Robinson-Whelen S, Sherwood AM. Spasticity experience domains in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(3):287-94.
7. Collins D. Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods. Qual Life Res. 2003;12(3):229-38.
8. Ditunno JF Jr, Young W, Donovan WH, Creasey G. The international standards booklet for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. American Spinal Injury Association. Paraplegia. 1994;32(2):70-80.
9. Muthén BO, Muthén LK. Mplus user's guide. 2nd ed. Los Angeles (CA): Muthén & Muthén; 2001.
10. Thompson B. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 2004.
11. Horn JL. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1965;30:179-85.
12. Zwick WR, Velicer WF. Comparison of 5 rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychol Bull. 1986;99(3):432-42.
13. Cattell RB. The scientific use of factor analysis. New York (NY): Plenum Press; 1978.
14. Shrout PE. Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry. Stat Methods Med Res. 1998;7(3):301-17.
15. Anastasi A. Psychological testing. New York (NY): Macmillan Publishing Company; 1988.
16. Embretson SE, Reise SP. Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000.
17. Penn RD. Intrathecal baclofen for severe spasticity. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;531:157-66.